Show simple item record

Sensibilidad de rasgos al estrés y procesos de sesgo cognitivo en peces: una breve descripción general

dc.contributor.authorBuenhombre Vasquez, Jhon Jairo
dc.contributor.authorDaza Cardona, Erika Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorRivera Rivera, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorMota Rojas, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Oliva, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorMedrano Galarza, Catalina
dc.contributor.authorDe Tarso, Paulo
dc.contributor.authorCajiao Pachón, María Nelly
dc.contributor.authorVargas, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorPedraza Toscano, Adriana
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-27T16:41:05Z
dc.date.available2026-02-27T16:41:05Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citation6en_US
dc.identifier.issn2513-9886en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6126
dc.description.abstractAl igual que otros animales, los peces tienen personalidades únicas que pueden afectar su cognición y sus respuestas a los estresores ambientales. Estas diferencias individuales de personalidad se conocen a menudo como "síndromes conductuales" o "estilos de afrontamiento del estrés" y pueden incluir rasgos de personalidad como la audacia, la timidez, la agresión, la exploración, la actividad locomotora y la sociabilidad. Por ejemplo, los peces más audaces o proactivos pueden ser más propensos a asumir riesgos y presentar una menor reactividad del eje hipotálamo-hipofisario-adrenal/interrenal en comparación con los individuos tímidos o reactivos. Asimismo, el aprendizaje y la memoria difieren entre las personalidades de los peces. Los individuos reactivos o tímidos tienden a tener un aprendizaje más rápido y una mejor memoria de asociación con estímulos aversivos, mientras que los individuos proactivos o audaces tienden a aprender más rápidamente cuando se presentan con incentivos apetitivos. Sin embargo, la influencia de la personalidad en los procesos cognitivos, más allá del logro cognitivo, en los peces ha sido escasamente explorada. Se han empleado pruebas de sesgo cognitivo para investigar la interacción entre la emoción y la cognición tanto en humanos como en animales. Los peces presentan procesos de sesgo cognitivo (CBP), en los que su interpretación de los estímulos podría verse influenciada por su estado emocional actual y ser susceptible a la modulación ambiental. Sin embargo, ningún estudio en peces ha explorado si el CBP, al igual que en otras especies, puede interpretarse como un rasgo duradero y si otras características individuales podrían explicar su variación. Consideramos que el CBP podría actuar como un factor de vulnerabilidad para la aparición, persistencia y recurrencia de trastornos relacionados con el estrés. Por lo tanto, estudiar el CBP en los peces como estado o rasgo y sus interacciones con las variaciones individuales podría ser valioso en futuras iniciativas para mejorar nuestra comprensión de la neurobiología de la ansiedad y el estrés en modelos animales y humanosen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relationhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/personality-neuroscience/article/trait-sensitivity-to-stress-and-cognitive-bias-processes-in-fish-a-brief-overview/50A9A1DEE4818CCE8E31A298E07FF7E6en_US
dc.titleSensibilidad de rasgos al estrés y procesos de sesgo cognitivo en peces: una breve descripción generalen_US
dc.title.translatedTrait sensitivity to stress and cognitive bias processes in fish: A brief overviewen_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0001120611en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0000127742en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0000919730en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0000772313en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0000230030en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0002441483en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarfu3eUuUAAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarIkAAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarr78AAAAJ&sortben_US
dc.contributor.googlescholaraVx8mUUAAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.googlescholargD-NfusAAAAJen_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarJq_8e-wAAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7793-742Xen_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3002-7066en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0302-9610en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0562-0367en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2690-189Xen_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0072-4450en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5686-5140en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4779-5969en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0922-6957en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateJhon-Buenhombreen_US
dc.contributor.researchgateErika-Daza-Cardonaen_US
dc.contributor.researchgateAstrid-Riveraen_US
dc.contributor.researchgateDaniel-Mota-Rojasen_US
dc.contributor.researchgateMaria-Nelly-Cajiao-Pachonen_US
dc.contributor.researchgatePessi-Sousaen_US
dc.contributor.scopus6506739367en_US
dc.contributor.scopus24069631600en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishLike other animals, fish have unique personalities that can affect their cognition and responses to environmental stressors. These individual personality differences are often referred to as "behavioral syndromes" or "stress coping styles" and can include personality traits such as boldness, shyness, aggression, exploration, locomotor activity, and sociability. For example, bolder or more proactive fish may be more likely to take risks and exhibit lower hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal/intrarenal axis reactivity compared to shy or reactive individuals. Similarly, learning and memory differ among fish personalities. Reactive or shy individuals tend to learn faster and have better associative memory with aversive stimuli, while proactive or bold individuals tend to learn more quickly when presented with appetitive incentives. However, the influence of personality on cognitive processes, beyond cognitive achievement, in fish has been scarcely explored. Cognitive bias tests have been used to investigate the interaction between emotion and cognition in both humans and animals. Fish exhibit cognitive bias processes (CBPs), in which their interpretation of stimuli may be influenced by their current emotional state and be susceptible to environmental modulation. However, no study in fish has explored whether CBPs, as in other species, can be interpreted as a lasting trait and whether other individual characteristics might explain its variation. We consider that CBPs could act as a vulnerability factor for the onset, persistence, and recurrence of stress-related disorders. Therefore, studying CBPs in fish as a state or trait and their interactions with individual variations could be valuable in future initiatives to improve our understanding of the neurobiology of anxiety and stress in animal and human models.en_US
dc.subject.proposalPez, personalidad, estrés, neurociencia, cognición, emociónen_US
dc.subject.keywordsFish, personality, stress, neuroscience, cognition, emotionen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ciencias agrarias y del ambienteen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesAlfonso, S., Sadoul, B., Gesto, M., Joassard, L., Chatain, B., Geffroy, B., & Bégout, M. L. (2019). Coping styles in European sea bass: The link between boldness, stress response and neurogenesis. Physiology & Behavior, 207, 76– 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2019.04.020en_US
dc.relation.referencesAriyomo, T. O., & Watt, P. J. (2012). The effect of variation in boldness and aggressiveness on the reproductive success of zebrafish. Animal Behaviour, 83, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.004en_US
dc.relation.referencesAsher, L., Friel, M., Griffin, K., & Collins, L. M. (2016). Mood and personality interact to determine cognitive biases in pigs. Biology Letters, 12, 20160402. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0402en_US
dc.relation.referencesBaciadonna, L., & McElligott, A. G. (2015). The use of judgement bias to assess welfare in farm livestock. Animal Welfare, 24, 81–91. https://doi.org/10. 7120/09627286.24.1.081en_US
dc.relation.referencesBaker, M. R., & Wong, R. Y. (2019). Contextual fear learning and memory differ between stress coping styles in zebrafish. Scientific Reports, 9, 9935. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46319-0en_US
dc.relation.referencesBaker, M. R., & Wong, R. Y. (2021). Npas4a expression in the teleost forebrain is associated with stress coping style differences in fear learning. Scientific Reports, 11, 12074. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-021-91495-7en_US
dc.relation.referencesBalzarini, V., Taborsky, M., Wanner, S., Koch, F., & Frommen, J. G. (2014). Mirror, mirror on the wall: The predictive value of mirror tests for measuring aggression in fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 68, 871–878. https:// doi.org/10.1007/S00265-014-1698-7/FIGURES/3en_US
dc.relation.referencesBari, A., Theobald, D. E., Caprioli, D., Mar, A. C., Aidoo-Micah, A., Dalley, J. W., & Robbins, T. W. (2010). Serotonin modulates sensitivity to reward and negative feedback in a probabilistic reversal learning task in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 1290–1301. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp. 2009.233en_US
dc.relation.referencesBarnard, S., Wells, D. L., Milligan, A. D. S., Arnott, G., & Hepper, P. G. (2018). Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris). Scientific Reports, 8, 6660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 018-25224-yen_US
dc.relation.referencesBateson, M. (2016). Optimistic and pessimistic biases: A primer for behavioural ecologists. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 12, 115–121. https://doi.o rg/10.1016/J.COBEHA.2016.09.013en_US
dc.relation.referencesBateson, M., Desire, S., Gartside, S. E., & Wright, G. A. (2011). Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases. Current Biology, 21, 1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2011.05.017en_US
dc.relation.referencesBeck, A. T. (2008). The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 969– 977. https://doi.org/10.1176/APPI.AJP.2008.08050721en_US
dc.relation.referencesBell, A. M., & Sih, A. (2007). Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ecology Letters, 10, 828– 834. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1461-0248.2007.01081.Xen_US
dc.relation.referencesBethell, E. J. (2015). A “how-to” guide for designing judgment bias studies to assess captive animal welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 18(Suppl 1), S18–S42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2015.1075833en_US
dc.relation.referencesBlanchette, I., & Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 561–595. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02699930903132496en_US
dc.relation.referencesBoulton, K., Couto, E., Grimmer, A. J., Earley, R. L., Canario, A. V. M., Wilson, A. J., & Walling, C. A. (2015). How integrated are behavioral and endocrine stress response traits? A repeated measures approach to testing the stress-coping style model. Ecology and Evolution, 5, 618–633. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ECE3.1395en_US
dc.relation.referencesBudaev, S. V., & Zhuikov, A. Y. (1998). Avoidance learning and “personality” in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 92–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.112.1.92en_US
dc.relation.referencesBuenhombre, J., Daza-Cardona, E. A., Sousa, P., & Gouveia, A. (2021). Different influences of anxiety models, environmental enrichment, standard conditions and intraspecies variation (sex, personality and strain) on stress and quality of life in adult and juvenile zebrafish: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 131, 765–791. https://doi.org/10. 1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2021.09.047en_US
dc.relation.referencesBuenhombre, J., Daza-Cardona, E. A., Sousa, P., Gouveia, A., & CajiaoPach´on, M. N. (2022). Structural environmental enrichment and the way it is offered influence cognitive judgement bias and anxiety-like behaviours in zebrafish. Animal Cognition, 26, 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10071- 022-01700-Xen_US
dc.relation.referencesBurman, O. H. P., & Mendl, M. T. (2018). A novel task to assess mood congruent memory bias in non-human animals. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 308, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNEUMETH.2018.07.003en_US
dc.relation.referencesBurman, O. H. P., Parker, R. M. A., Paul, E. S., & Mendl, M. (2008). Sensitivity to reward loss as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare. Biology Letters, 4, 330–333. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSBL.2008.0113en_US
dc.relation.referencesCastanheira, M. F., Conceição, L. E. C., Millot, S., Rey, S., Bégout, M.-L., Damsgård, B., ::: Martins, C. I. M. (2017). Coping styles in farmed fish: Consequences for aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture, 9, 23–41. https:// doi.org/10.1111/raq.12100en_US
dc.relation.referencesCastanheira, M. F., Herrera, M., Costas, B., Conceição, L. E. C., & Martins, C. I. M. (2013a). Can we predict personality in fish? Searching for consistency over time and across contexts. PLoS ONE, 8, e62037. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0062037en_US
dc.relation.referencesCastanheira, M. F., Herrera, M., Costas, B., Conceição, L. E. C., & Martins, C. I. M. (2013b). Linking cortisol responsiveness and aggressive behaviour in gilthead seabream Sparus aurata: Indication of divergent coping styles. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 143, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.a pplanim.2012.11.008en_US
dc.relation.referencesCerqueira, M., Millot, S., Castanheira, M. F., Félix, A. S., Silva, T., Oliveira, G. A., ::: Oliveira, R. F. (2017). Cognitive appraisal of environmental stimuli induces emotion-like states in fish. Scientific Reports, 7, 13181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13173-xen_US
dc.relation.referencesCerqueira, M., Millot, S., Felix, A., Silva, T., Oliveira, G. A., Oliveira, C. C. V., ::: Oliveira, R.(2020). Cognitive appraisal in fish: Stressor predictability modulates the physiological and neurobehavioural stress response in sea bass. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287, 20192922. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2922en_US
dc.relation.referencesCerqueira, M., Millot, S., Silva, T., Félix, A. S., Castanheira, M. F., Rey, S., ::: Oliveira, R. F. (2021). Stressor controllability modulates the stress response in fish. BMC Neuroscience, 22, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/ S12868-021-00653-0/FIGURES/4en_US
dc.relation.referencesChrousos, G. P. (2009). Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 5, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo. 2009.106en_US
dc.relation.referencesCisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in the anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPR.2009.11.003en_US
dc.relation.referencesClark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2010). Cognitive theory and therapy of anxiety and depression: Convergence with neurobiological findings. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2010.06.007en_US
dc.relation.referencesColchen, T., Faux, E., Teletchea, F., & Pasquet, A. (2017). Is personality of young fish consistent through different behavioural tests? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 194, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLANIM. 2017.05.012en_US
dc.relation.referencesCollier, A. D., Kalueff, A. V., & Echevarria, D. J. (2017). Zebrafish models of anxiety-like behaviors. In A. V. Kalueff (Ed.), The rights and wrongs of zebrafish: Behavioral phenotyping of zebrafish (pp. 45–72), Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33774-6_3en_US
dc.relation.referencesConrad, J. L., Weinersmith, K. L., Brodin, T., Saltz, J. B., & Sih, A. (2011). Behavioural syndromes in fishes: A review with implications for ecology and fisheries management. Journal of Fish Biology, 78, 395–435. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/J.1095-8649.2010.02874.Xen_US
dc.relation.referencesCouvillon, P. A., & Bitterman, M. E. (1985). Effect of experience with a preferred food on consummatory responding for a less preferred food in goldfish. Animal Learning & Behavior, 13, 433–438. https://doi.org/10.3758/ BF03208020/METRICSen_US
dc.relation.referencesCrump, A., Arnott, G., & Bethell, E. J. (2018). Affect-driven attention biases as animal welfare indicators: Review and methods.Animals, 8, 136. https://doi.o rg/10.3390/ani8080136en_US
dc.relation.referencesCurzytek, K., Kubera, M., Trojan, E., W´ojcik, K., Basta-Kaim, A., Detka, J., ::: Rygula, R. (2018). The effects of pessimism on cell-mediated immunity in rats. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 80, 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PNPBP.2017.04.034en_US
dc.relation.referencesCussen, V. A., & Mench, J. A. (2015). The relationship between personality dimensions and resiliency to environmental stress in orange-winged amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica), as indicated by the development of abnormal behaviors. PLOS ONE, 10, e0126170. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0126170en_US
dc.relation.referencesDahlbom, S. J., Backström, T., Lundstedt-Enkel, K., & Winberg, S. (2012). Aggression and monoamines: Effects of sex and social rank in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behavioural Brain Research, 228, 333–338. https://doi.org/10. 1016/J.BBR.2011.12.011en_US
dc.relation.referencesDehmelt, F. A., Von Daranyi, A., Leyden, C., & Arrenberg, A. B. (2018). Evoking and tracking zebrafish eye movement in multiple larvae with ZebEyeTrack. Nature Protocols, 13, 1539–1568. https://doi.org/10.1038/ S41596-018-0002-0en_US
dc.relation.referencesDemin, K. A., Lakstygal, A. M., Alekseeva, P. A., Sysoev, M., de Abreu, M. S., Alpyshov, E. T., ::: Kalueff, A. V. (2019). The role of intraspecies variation in fish neurobehavioral and neuropharmacological phenotypes in aquatic models. Aquatic Toxicology, 210, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox. 2019.02.015en_US
dc.relation.referencesDisner, S. G., Beevers, C. G., Haigh, E. A. P., & Beck, A. T. (2011). Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 12, 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/NRN3027en_US
dc.relation.referencesDreher, J. C. (2007). Sensitivity of the brain to loss aversion during risky gambles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 270–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. TICS.2007.05.006en_US
dc.relation.referencesEgan, R. J., Bergner, C. L., Hart, P. C., Cachat, J. M., Canavello, P. R., Elegante, M. F., ::: Kalueff, A. V. (2009). Understanding behavioral and physiological phenotypes of stress and anxiety in zebrafish. Behavioural Brain Research, 205, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.022en_US
dc.relation.referencesEnkel, T., Gholizadeh, D., Von Bohlen Und Halbach, O., Sanchis-Segura, C., Hurlemann, R., Spanagel, R., ::: Vollmayr, B. (2009). Ambiguous-cue interpretation is biased under stress- and depression-like states in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology, 35, 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp. 2009.204en_US
dc.relation.referencesEspigares, F., Abad-Tortosa, D., Varela, S., Oliveira, R., & Ferreira, M. G. (2021). Short telomeres drive pessimistic judgement bias in zebrafish. Biology Letters, 17, 20200745. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0745ïen_US
dc.relation.referencesEspigares, F., Alvarado, M. V., Faísca, P., Abad-Tortosa, D., & Oliveira, R. F. (2022). Pessimistic cognitive bias is associated with enhanced reproductive investment in female zebrafish. Biology Letters, 18, 20220232. https://doi.org/ 10.1098/RSBL.2022.0232en_US
dc.relation.referencesFaustino, A. I., Oliveira, G. A., & Oliveira, R. F. (2015). Linking appraisal to behavioral flexibility in animals: Implications for stress research. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00104en_US
dc.relation.referencesFerrari, M. C. O., Wisenden, B. D., & Chivers, D. P. (2010). Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: A review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 88, 698–724. https://doi.org/10. 1139/Z10-029en_US
dc.relation.referencesGesto, M., Madsen, L., Andersen, N. R., & Jokumsen, A. (2018). Differences in stress and disease resilience related to emergence time for first feeding in farmed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The Journal of Experimental Biology, 221, jeb174623. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.174623en_US
dc.relation.referencesGolla, A., Østby, H., & Kermen, F. (2020). Chronic unpredictable stress induces anxiety-like behaviors in young zebrafish. Scientific Reports, 10, 1– 10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67182-4en_US
dc.relation.referencesGreiveldinger, L., Veissier, I., & Boissy, A. (2011). The ability of lambs to form expectations and the emotional consequences of a discrepancy from their expectations. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 806–815. https://doi.org/10. 1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2010.11.002en_US
dc.relation.referencesHarding, E. J., Paul, E. S., & Mendl, M. (2004). Cognitive bias and affective state. Nature, 427, 312. https://doi.org/10.1038/427312aen_US
dc.relation.referencesHouslay, T. M., Earley, R. L., White, S. J., Lammers, W., Grimmer, A. J., Travers, L. M., ::: Wilson, A. (2022). Genetic integration of behavioural and endocrine components of the stress response. ELife, 11, e67126. https:// doi.org/10.7554/ELIFE.67126en_US
dc.relation.referencesKareklas, K., Elwood, R. W., & Holland, R. A. (2018). Fish learn collectively, but groups with differing personalities are slower to decide and more likely to split. Biology Open, 7, bio033613. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.033613en_US
dc.relation.referencesKeen, H. A., Nelson, O. L., Robbins, C. T., Evans, M., Shepherdson, D. J., & Newberry, R. C. (2014). Validation of a novel cognitive bias task based on difference in quantity of reinforcement for assessing environmental enrichment. Animal Cognition, 17, 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0684-1en_US
dc.relation.referencesKhan, K. M., & Echevarria, D. J. (2017). Feeling fishy: Trait differences in zebrafish (Danio rerio). In J. Vonk, A. Weiss, & S. A. Kuczaj (Eds.), Personality in nonhuman animals (pp. 111–127), Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59300-5_6en_US
dc.relation.referencesKluemper, D. H., Little, L. M., & Degroot, T. (2009). State or trait: Effects of state optimism on job-related outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.591en_US
dc.relation.referencesKoolhaas, J. M., Bartolomucci, A., Buwalda, B., de Boer, S. F., Flügge, G., Korte, S. M., ::: Fuchs, E. (2011). Stress revisited: A critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003en_US
dc.relation.referencesKoolhaas, J. M., de Boer, S. F., Coppens, C. M., & Buwalda, B. (2010). Neuroendocrinology of coping styles: Towards understanding the biology of individual variation. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 31, 307–321. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.YFRNE.2010.04.001en_US
dc.relation.referencesKošťál, Ľ., Skalná, Z., & Pichová, K. (2020). Use of cognitive bias as a welfare tool in poultry. Journal of Animal Science, 98, S63–S79. https://doi.org/10. 1093/jas/skaa039en_US
dc.relation.referencesKremer, L., Bus, J. D., Webb, L. E., Bokkers, E. A. M., Engel, B., van der Werf, J. T. N., ::: van Reenen, C. G. (2021). Housing and personality effects on judgement and attention biases in dairy cows. Scientific Reports, 11, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01843-wen_US
dc.relation.referencesKremer, L., Klein Holkenborg, S. E. J., Reimert, I., Bolhuis, J. E., & Webb, L. E. (2020). The nuts and bolts of animal emotion. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 113, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2020.01.028en_US
dc.relation.referencesLagisz, M., Zidar, J., Nakagawa, S., Neville, V., Sorato, E., Paul, E. S., ::: Løvlie, H. (2020). Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 118, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2020.07.012en_US
dc.relation.referencesLaubu, C., Louâpre, P., & Dechaume-Moncharmont, F. X. (2019). Pairbonding influences affective state in a monogamous fish species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286, 20190760. https://doi.org/10. 1098/rspb.2019.0760en_US
dc.relation.referencesLecorps, B., Weary, D. M., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. G. (2018). Pessimism and fearfulness in dairy calves. Scientific Reports, 8, 1421. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41598-017-17214-3en_US
dc.relation.referencesLee, C., Cafe, L. M., Robinson, S. L., Doyle, R. E., Lea, J. M., Small, A. H., & Colditz, I. G. (2018). Anxiety influences attention bias but not flight speed and crush score in beef cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 205, 210– 215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.003en_US
dc.relation.referencesLee, C. J., Paull, G. C., & Tyler, C. R. (2018). Effects of environmental enrichment on survivorship, growth, sex ratio and behaviour in laboratory maintained zebrafish Danio rerio. Journal of Fish Biology, 94, 86–95. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13865en_US
dc.relation.referencesLee, C. J., Paull, G. C., & Tyler, C. R. (2018). Effects of environmental enrichment on survivorship, growth, sex ratio and behaviour in laboratory maintained zebrafish Danio rerio. Journal of Fish Biology, 94, 86–95. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13865en_US
dc.relation.referencesLee, C., Verbeek, E., Doyle, R., & Bateson, M. (2016). Attention bias to threat indicates anxiety differences in sheep. Biology Letters, 12, 20150977. https:// doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0977en_US
dc.relation.referencesLucon-Xiccato, T., & Bisazza, A. (2017). Individual differences in cognition among teleost fishes. Behavioural Processes, 141, 184–195. https://doi.org/10. 1016/J.BEPROC.2017.01.015en_US
dc.relation.referencesMagnhagen, C., & Bunnefeld, N. (2009). Express your personality or go along with the group: What determines the behaviour of shoaling perch? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 3369–3375. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPB.2009.0851en_US
dc.relation.referencesMartins, E. P., & Bhat, A. (2014). Population-level personalities in zebrafish: Aggression-boldness across but not within populations. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru007en_US
dc.relation.referencesMcEwen, B. S., & Wingfield, J. C. (2003). The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Hormones and Behavior, 43, 2–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0018-506X(02)00024-7en_US
dc.relation.referencesMendl, M., Brooks, J., Basse, C., Burman, O., Paul, E., Blackwell, E., & Casey, R. (2010). Dogs showing separation-related behaviour exhibit a ‘pessimistic’ cognitive bias. Current Biology, 20, R839–R840. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. CUB.2010.08.030en_US
dc.relation.referencesMendl, M., Burman, O. H. P., Parker, R. M. A., & Paul, E. S. (2009). Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118, 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023en_US
dc.relation.referencesMendl, M., & Paul, E. S. (2020). Animal affect and decision-making. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 144–163. https://doi.org/10. 1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2020.01.025en_US
dc.relation.referencesMonk, J. E., Doyle, R. E., Colditz, I. G., Belson, S., Cronin, G. M., & Lee, C. (2018). Towards a more practical attention bias test to assess affective state in sheep. PLoS ONE, 13, e0190404. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0190404en_US
dc.relation.referencesNeville, V., Nakagawa, S., Zidar, J., Paul, E. S., Lagisz, M., Bateson, M., ::: Mendl, M. (2020). Pharmacological manipulations of judgement bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 108, 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.008en_US
dc.relation.referencesNguyen, H. A. T., Guo, C., & Homberg, J. R. (2020). Cognitive bias under adverse and rewarding conditions: A systematic review of rodent studies. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh. 2020.00014en_US
dc.relation.referencesNorton, W. H. J., Stumpenhorst, K., Faus-Kessler, T., Folchert, A., Rohner, N., Harris, M. P., ::: Bally-Cuif, L. (2011). Modulation of Fgfr1a signaling in zebrafish reveals a genetic basis for the aggression–boldness syndrome. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 13796–13807. https://doi.org/10.1523/ JNEUROSCI.2892-11.2011en_US
dc.relation.referencesNoworyta, K., Cieslik, A., Rygula, R., Dziedzicka-Wasylewska, M., & FaronG´orecka, A. (2021). Neuromolecular underpinnings of negative cognitive bias in depression. Cells, 10, 3157. https://doi.org/10.3390/CELLS10113157en_US
dc.relation.referencesNoworyta-Sokolowska, K., Kozub, A., Jablonska, J., Rodriguez Parkitna, J., Drozd, R., & Rygula, R. (2019). Sensitivity to negative and positive feedback as a stable and enduring behavioural trait in rats. Psychopharmacology, 236, 2389–2403. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00213-019-05333-W/FIGURES/7en_US
dc.relation.referencesOliveira, R. F., Simes, J. M., Teles, M. C., Oliveira, C. R., Becker, J. D., & Lopes, J. S. (2016). Assessment of fight outcome is needed to activate socially driven transcriptional changes in the zebrafish brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, E654– E661. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1514292113/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.1514 292113.SD01.XLSen_US
dc.relation.referencesØverli, Ø., Pottinger, T. G., Carrick, T. R., Øverli, E., & Winberg, S. (2001). Brain monoaminergic activity in rainbow trout selected for high and low stress responsiveness. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 57, 214–224. https:// doi.org/10.1159/000047238en_US
dc.relation.referencesØverli, Ø., & Sørensen, C. (2016). On the role of neurogenesis and neural plasticity in the evolution of animal personalities and stress coping styles. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 87, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/ 000447085en_US
dc.relation.referencesØverli, Ø., Sørensen, C., Pulman, K. G. T., Pottinger, T. G., Korzan, W., Summers, C. H., & Nilsson, G. E.(2007). Evolutionary background for stresscoping styles: Relationships between physiological, behavioral, and cognitive traits in non-mammalian vertebrates. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 31, 396–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2006.10.006en_US
dc.relation.referencesØverli, Ø., Winberg, S., & Pottinger, T. G. (2005). Behavioral and neuroendocrine correlates of selection for stress responsiveness in rainbow trout—a review. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45, 463–474. https:// doi.org/10.1093/ICB/45.3.463en_US
dc.relation.referencesPaul, E. S., & Mendl, M. T. (2018). Animal emotion: Descriptive and prescriptive definitions and their implications for a comparative perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 205, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.a pplanim.2018.01.008en_US
dc.relation.referencesPerry, C. J., & Baciadonna, L. (2017). Studying emotion in invertebrates: What has been done, what can be measured and what they can provide. Journal of Experimental Biology, 220, 3856–3868. https://doi.org/10.1242/ jeb.151308en_US
dc.relation.referencesPrentice, P. M., Houslay, T. M., & Wilson, A. J. (2022). Exploiting animal personality to reduce chronic stress in captive fish populations. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, 1929. https://doi.org/10.3389/FVETS.2022.1046205/ BIBTEXen_US
dc.relation.referencesRajput, N., Parikh, K., & Kenney, J. W. (2022). Beyond bold versus shy: Zebrafish exploratory behavior falls into several behavioral clusters and is influenced by strain and sex. Biology Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio. 059443en_US
dc.relation.referencesRaoult, V., Trompf, L., Williamson, J. E., & Brown, C. (2017). Stress profile influences learning approach in a marine fish. PeerJ, 5, e3445. https://doi.org/ 10.7717/peerj.3445en_US
dc.relation.referencesRobinson, O. J. (2019). The neural circuitry of negative bias, oversensitivity to negative feedback, and hyposensitivity to reward in major depressive disorder. In B. T. Baune & C. Harmer (Eds.), Cognitive dimensions of major depressive disorder (pp. 115–128), Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/MED/9780198810940.003.0010en_US
dc.relation.referencesRoelofs, S., Boleij, H., Nordquist, R. E., & van der Staay, F. J. (2016). Making decisions under ambiguity: Judgment bias tasks for assessing emotional state in animals. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 119. https://doi.org/10. 3389/fnbeh.2016.00119en_US
dc.relation.referencesRoss, M., Garland, A., Harlander-Matauschek, A., Kitchenham, L., & Mason, G. (2019). Welfare-improving enrichments greatly reduce hens’ startle responses, despite little change in judgment bias. Scientific Reports, 9, 11881. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48351-6en_US
dc.relation.referencesRuiz-Gomez, M. de L., Huntingford, F. A., Øverli, Ø., Thörnqvist, P. O., & Höglund, E. (2011). Response to environmental change in rainbow trout selected for divergent stress coping styles. Physiology & Behavior, 102, 317– 322. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2010.11.023en_US
dc.relation.referencesRygula, R., Golebiowska, J., Kregiel, J., Kubik, J., & Popik, P. (2015). Effects of optimism on motivation in rats. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 32. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00032en_US
dc.relation.referencesRygula, R., Noworyta-Sokolowska, K., Drozd, R., & Kozub, A. (2018). Using rodents to model abnormal sensitivity to feedback in depression. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 95, 336–346. https://doi.org/10. 1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2018.10.008en_US
dc.relation.referencesRygula, R., Papciak, J., & Popik, P. (2013). Trait pessimism predicts vulnerability to stress-induced anhedonia in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology, 38, 2188–2196. https://doi.org/10.1038/NPP.2013.116en_US
dc.relation.referencesRygula, R., & Popik, P. (2016). Trait “pessimism” is associated with increased sensitivity to negative feedback in rats. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 516–526. https://doi.org/10.3758/S13415-016-0410-Yen_US
dc.relation.referencesSalena, M. G., Turko, A. J., Singh, A., Pathak, A., Hughes, E., Brown, C., & Balshine, S. (2021). Understanding fish cognition: A review and appraisal of current practices. Animal Cognition, 24, 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/ S10071-021-01488-2en_US
dc.relation.referencesSaraiva, J. L., Castanheira, M. F., Arechavala-L´opez, P., Volstorf, J., Studer, B. H., Saraiva, J. L., ::: Studer, B. H. (2018). Domestication and welfare in farmed fish. Animal Domestication, 46, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5772/ INTECHOPEN.77251en_US
dc.relation.referencesSih, A., Bell, A. M., Johnson, J. C., & Ziemba, R. E. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: An integrative overview. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 241–277. https://doi.org/10.1086/422893en_US
dc.relation.referencesSilva, P. I. M., Martins, C. I. M., Engrola, S., Marino, G., Øverli, Ø., & Conceição, L. E. C. (2010). Individual differences in cortisol levels and behaviour of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis) juveniles: Evidence for coping styles. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 124, 75–81. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/J.APPLANIM.2010.01.008en_US
dc.relation.referencesSmith, B. R., & Blumstein, D. T. (2010). Behavioral types as predictors of survival in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Behavioral Ecology, 21, 919–926. https://doi.org/10.1093/BEHECO/ARQ084en_US
dc.relation.referencesSong, C., Liu, B.-P. P., Zhang, Y.-P. P., Peng, Z., Wang, J. J., Collier, A. D., ::: Kalueff, A. V. (2018). Modeling consequences of prolonged strong unpredictable stress in zebrafish: Complex effects on behavior and physiology. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 81, 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.08.021en_US
dc.relation.referencesSong, C., Yang, L., Wang, J., Chen, P., Li, S., Liu, Y., ::: Kalueff, A. V.(2016). Building neurophenomics in zebrafish: Effects of prior testing stress and test batteries. Behavioural Brain Research, 311, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bbr.2016.05.005en_US
dc.relation.referencesSørensen, C., Johansen, I. B., & Øverli, Ø. (2013). Neural plasticity and stress coping in teleost fishes. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 181, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2012.12.003en_US
dc.relation.referencesSzopa-Comley, A. W., Duffield, C., Ramnarine, I. W., & Ioannou, C. C.(2020). Predatory behaviour as a personality trait in a wild fish population. Animal Behaviour, 170, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2020.10.002en_US
dc.relation.referencesTakatsu-Coleman, A. L., Patti, C. L., Zanin, K. A., Zager, A., Carvalho, R. C., Borçoi, A. R., ::: Frussa-Filho, R. (2013). Short-term social isolation induces depressive-like behaviour and reinstates the retrieval of an aversive task: Mood-congruent memory in male mice? Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 38, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1503/JPN.120050en_US
dc.relation.referencesTan, S. L. T. (2017). Cognitive bias as an indicator of emotional state and welfare in captive zebrafish. Thesis, The University of Melbourne. http://hdl. handle.net/11343/192860en_US
dc.relation.referencesTan, S. L. T., Handasyde, K. A., Rault, J. L., & Mendl, M. (2020a). Insensitivity to reward shifts in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and implications for assessing affective states. Animal Cognition, 23, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/ S10071-019-01318-6/FIGURES/7en_US
dc.relation.referencesTan, S. L. T., Handasyde, K. A., Rault, J. L., & Mendl, M. (2020b). Insensitivity to reward shifts in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and implications for assessing affective states. Animal Cognition, 23, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10071-019-01318-6en_US
dc.relation.referencesTaylor Tavares, J. V., Clark, L., Furey, M. L., Williams, G. B., Sahakian, B. J., & Drevets, W. C. (2008). Neural basis of abnormal response to negative feedback in unmedicated mood disorders. NeuroImage, 42, 1118. https:// doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2008.05.049en_US
dc.relation.referencesTeles, M. C., & Oliveira, R. F. (2016). Androgen response to social competition in a shoaling fish. Hormones and Behavior, 78, 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.yhbeh.2015.10.009en_US
dc.relation.referencesThomson, J. S., Watts, P. C., Pottinger, T. G., & Sneddon, L. U. (2012). Plasticity of boldness in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss: Do hunger and predation influence risk-taking behaviour? Hormones and Behavior, 61, 750–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.03.014en_US
dc.relation.referencesThorbjørnsen, S. H., Moland, E., Villegas-Ríos, D., Bleeker, K., Knutsen, H., & Olsen, E. M. (2021). Selection on fish personality differs between a no-take marine reserve and fished areas. Evolutionary Applications, 14, 1807–1815. https://doi.org/10.1111/EVA.13242en_US
dc.relation.referencesThörnqvist, P. O., McCarrick, S., Ericsson, M., Roman, E., & Winberg, S. (2019). Bold zebrafish (Danio rerio) express higher levels of delta opioid and dopamine D2 receptors in the brain compared to shy fish. Behavioural Brain Research, 359, 927–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. BBR.2018.06.017en_US
dc.relation.referencesToms, C. N., & Echevarria, D. J. (2014). Back to basics: Searching for a comprehensive framework for exploring individual differences in zebrafish (Danio Rerio) behavior. Zebrafish, 11, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb. 2013.0952en_US
dc.relation.referencesToms, C. N., Echevarria, D. J., & Jouandot, D. J. (2010). A methodological review of personality-related studies in fish: Focus on the shy-bold axis of behavior. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, 1–25. https:// doi.org/10.46867/IJCP.2010.23.01.08en_US
dc.relation.referencesTorgerson-White, L., & Sánchez-Suárez, W. (2022). Looking beyond the shoal: Fish welfare as an individual attribute. Animals, 12, 2592. https://doi.o rg/10.3390/ANI12192592en_US
dc.relation.referencesVindas, M. A., Magnhagen, C., Brännäs, E., Øverli, Ø., Winberg, S., Nilsson, J., & Backström, T. (2017). Brain cortisol receptor expression differs in Arctic charr displaying opposite coping styles. Physiology & Behavior, 177, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.04.024en_US
dc.relation.referencesVital, C., & Martins, E. P. (2013). Socially-central zebrafish influence group behavior more than those on the social periphery. PLoS ONE, 8, e55503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055503en_US
dc.relation.referencesVolgin, A. D., Yakovlev, O. A., Demin, K. A., de Abreu, M. S., Alekseeva, P. A., Friend, A. J., ::: Kalueff, A. V. (2019). Zebrafish models for personalized psychiatry: Insights from individual, strain and sex differences, and modeling gene x environment interactions. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 97, 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24337en_US
dc.relation.referencesWay, G. P., Kiesel, A. L., Ruhl, N., Snekser, J. L., & McRobert, S. P. (2015). Sex differences in a shoaling-boldness behavioral syndrome, but no link with aggression. Behavioural Processes, 113, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. BEPROC.2014.12.014en_US
dc.relation.referencesWinberg, S., & Thörnqvist, P. O. (2016). Role of brain serotonin in modulating fish behavior. Current Zoology, 62, 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/CZ/ ZOW037en_US
dc.relation.referencesWong, R. Y., French, J., & Russ, J. B. (2019). Differences in stress reactivity between zebrafish with alternative stress coping styles. Royal Society Open Science, 6, 181797. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181797en_US
dc.relation.referencesZabegalov, K. N., Kolesnikova, T. O., Khatsko, S. L., Volgin, A. D., Yakovlev, O. A., Amstislavskaya, T. G., ::: Kalueff, A. V. (2018). Understanding zebrafish aggressive behavior. Behavioural Processes, 158, 200–210. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.11.010en_US
dc.relation.referencesZimmerman, P. H., Buijs, S. A. F., Bolhuis, J. E., & Keeling, L. J. (2011). Behaviour of domestic fowl in anticipation of positive and negative stimuli. Animal Behaviour, 81, 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANBEHAV.2010. 11.028en_US
dc.identifier.DOI10.1017/pen.2023.14en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
trait-sensitivity-to-stress-an ...
Size:
195.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Articulo principal
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record