Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEspinel Blanco, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorValencia Ochoa, Guillermo Eliécer
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Forero, Jorge
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-19T16:17:58Z
dc.date.available2025-11-19T16:17:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-04
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6087
dc.description.abstractEn este artículo se llevó a cabo una evaluación termodinámica, exergética y de impacto ambiental de un ciclo Brayton S-CO2 acoplado a un ciclo Rankine orgánico (ORC) como ciclo de fondo para evaluar los parámetros de rendimiento y los posibles impactos ambientales del sistema combinado. Las variables de rendimiento estudiadas fueron la potencia neta, la eficiencia térmica y exergética, y el consumo específico de combustible (BSFC) en función de la variación de la temperatura de entrada de la turbina (TIT) y la alta presión (PHIGH), parámetros operativos relevantes del ciclo Brayton S-CO2. Los resultados mostraron que la turbina principal (T1) y la turbina secundaria (T2) del ciclo Brayton S-CO2 presentaron eficiencias exergéticas más altas (97%) y un mejor comportamiento térmico y exergético en comparación con los demás componentes del sistema. En cuanto a la destrucción de exergía, se observó que los intercambiadores de calor del sistema presentaban la mayor destrucción de exergía como consecuencia de la gran diferencia de temperatura media entre el dióxido de carbono, el aceite térmico y el fluido orgánico, y por lo tanto, este equipo presenta las mayores irreversibilidades de transferencia de calor del sistema. Asimismo, mediante el análisis del ciclo de vida, se evaluó el impacto ambiental potencial del sistema para proponer un diseño térmico acorde con los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. Por consiguiente, se obtuvo que T1 era el componente con un impacto ambiental más significativo, con un valor máximo de 4416 Pts cuando se selecciona el cobre como material del equipo.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relationhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2259en_US
dc.titleEvaluación del impacto termodinámico, exergético y ambiental del ciclo Brayton S-CO2 acoplado con ORC como ciclo de fondoen_US
dc.title.translatedThermodynamic, Exergy and Environmental Impact Assessment of S-CO2 Brayton Cycle Coupled with ORC as Bottoming Cycleen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacEdwin Espinel Blanco [0001200917]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacGuillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [0001129635]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacJorge Duarte Forero [0001478424]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarEdwin Espinel Blanco [3ODKG4cAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarGuillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [Gu-McaYAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarJorge Duarte Forero [51nyiJoAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidEdwin Espinel Blanco [0000-0003-4479-2874]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidGuillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [0000-0001-5437-1964]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidJorge Duarte Forero [0000-0001-7345-9590]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusEdwin Espinel Blanco [57209774810]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusJorge Duarte Forero [55804011500]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishIn this article, a thermodynamic, exergy, and environmental impact assessment was carried out on a Brayton S-CO2 cycle coupled with an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) as a bottoming cycle to evaluate performance parameters and potential environmental impacts of the combined system. The performance variables studied were the net power, thermal and exergetic efficiency, and the brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) as a function of the variation in turbine inlet temperature (TIT) and high pressure (PHIGH), which are relevant operation parameters from the Brayton S-CO2 cycle. The results showed that the main turbine (T1) and secondary turbine (T2) of the Brayton S-CO2 cycle presented higher exergetic efficiencies (97%), and a better thermal and exergetic behavior compared to the other components of the System. Concerning exergy destruction, it was found that the heat exchangers of the system presented the highest exergy destruction as a consequence of the large mean temperature difference between the carbon dioxide, thermal oil, and organic fluid, and thus this equipment presents the greatest heat transfer irreversibilities of the system. Also, through the Life Cycle Analysis, the potential environmental impact of the system was evaluated to propose a thermal design according to the sustainable development goals. Therefore, it was obtained that T1 was the component with a more significant environmental impact, with a maximum value of 4416 Pts when copper is selected as the equipment material.en_US
dc.subject.proposalBraytonen_US
dc.subject.proposalImpacto ambientalen_US
dc.subject.proposalExergíaen_US
dc.subject.proposalAnálisis del ciclo de vidaen_US
dc.subject.proposalORCen_US
dc.subject.proposalParámetros de rendimientoen_US
dc.subject.keywordsBraytonen_US
dc.subject.keywordsenvironmental impacten_US
dc.subject.keywordsexergyen_US
dc.subject.keywordslife cycle analysisen_US
dc.subject.keywordsORCen_US
dc.subject.keywordsperformance parametersen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesDiaz, G.A.; Forero, J.D.; Garcia, J.; Rincon, A.; Fontalvo, A.; Bula, A.; Padilla, R.V. Maximum power from fluid flow by applying the first and second laws of thermodynamics. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2017, 139, 032903. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, R.; Gutiérrez, A.S.; Eras, J.J.C.; Valencia, K.; Hernández, B.; Forero, J.D. Evaluation of the energy recovery potential of thermoelectric generators in diesel engines. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118412. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAngelino, G. Carbon Dioxide Condensation Cycles. J. Eneg. Power 1968, 287–295. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesDostal, V.; Driscoll, M.J.; Hejzlar, P.A. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycle for Next Generation Nuclear Reactors. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, UK, March 2004.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAbrosimov, K.A.; Baccioli, A.; Bischi, A. Techno-economic analysis of combined inverted Brayton—Organic Rankine cycle for high-temperature waste heat recovery. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2019, 3, 100014. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesGuo, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Niu, F.; Lu, D. Optimal design of supercritical CO2 power cycle for next generation nuclear power conversion systems. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2018, 108, 111–121. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPadilla, R.V.; Soo Too, Y.C.; Benito, R.; Stein, W. Exergetic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated with solar central receivers. Appl. Energy 2015, 148, 348–365. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPadilla, R.V.; Benito, R.G.; Stein, W. An Exergy Analysis of Recompression Supercritical CO2 Cycles with and without Reheating. Energy Procedia 2015, 69, 1181–1191. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesGlatzmaier, G.C.; Turchi, C.S. Supercritical CO2 as a Heat Transfer and Power Cycle Fluid for CSP Systems. In Proceedings of the ASME 2009 3rd International Conference on Energy Sustainability collocated with the Heat Transfer and InterPACK09 Conferences, San Francisco, CA, USA, 19–23 July 2009; pp. 673–676.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHinze, J.F.; Nellis, G.F.; Anderson, M.H. Cost comparison of printed circuit heat exchanger to low cost periodic flow regenerator for use as recuperator in a s-CO2 Brayton cycle. Appl. Energy 2017, 208, 1150–1161. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesSharan, P.; Neises, T.; Turchi, C. Thermal desalination via supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: Optimal system design and techno-economic analysis without reduction in cycle efficiency. Appl. Ther. Eng. 2019, 152, 499–514. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPark, J.H.; Park, H.S.; Kwon, J.G.; Kim, T.H.; Kim, M.H. Optimization and thermodynamic analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton recompression cycle for various small modular reactors. Energy 2018, 160, 520–535. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesLi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yao, M.; Kruizenga, A.; Anderson, M. PDF-based modeling on the turbulent convection heat transfer of supercritical CO2 in the printed circuit heat exchangers for the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2016, 98, 204–218. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAhn, Y.; Bae, S.J.; Kim, M.; Cho, S.K.; Baik, S.; Lee, J.I.; Cha, J.E. Review of supercritical CO 2 power cycle technology and current status of research and development. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2015, 47, 647–661. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesMusgrove, G.; Sullivan, S.; Shiferaw, D.; Fourspring, P. Heat exchangers. In Fundamentals and Applications of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (SCO2 ) Based Power Cycles; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 217–244.en_US
dc.relation.referencesJiang, Y.; Liese, E.; Zitney, S.E.; Bhattacharyya, D. Optimal design of microtube recuperators for an indirect supercritical carbon dioxide recompression closed Brayton cycle. Appl. Energy 2018, 216, 634–648. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesJiang, Y.; Liese, E.; Zitney, S.E.; Bhattacharyya, D. Design and dynamic modeling of printed circuit heat exchangers for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton power cycles. Appl. Energy 2018, 231, 1019–1032. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesChen, J.; Liu, Y.; Lu, X.; Ji, X.; Wang, C. Designing heat exchanger for enhancing heat transfer of slurries in biogas plants. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 1288–1293. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPidaparti, S.R.; Anderson, M.H.; Ranjan, D. Experimental Investigation of thermal-hydraulic performance of discontinuous fin printed circuit heat exchangers for Supercritical CO2 power cycles. Exp. Ther. Fluid Sci. 2019, 106, 119–129. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPidaparti, S.R.; Anderson, M.H.; Ranjan, D. Experimental Investigation of thermal-hydraulic performance of discontinuous fin printed circuit heat exchangers for Supercritical CO2 power cycles. Exp. Ther. Fluid Sci. 2019, 106, 119–129. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesVan Putten, H.; Colonna, P. Dynamic modeling of steam power cycles: Part II—Simulation of a small simple Rankine cycle system. Appl. Ther. Eng. 2007, 27, 2566–2582. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesChien, N.B.; Jong-Taek, O.; Asano, H.; Tomiyama, Y. Investigation of experiment and simulation of a plate heat exchanger. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 5635–5640. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Huang, D. Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle: A state-of-the-art review. Energy 2019, 189, 115900. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesMohammadkhani, F.; Shokati, N.; Mahmoudi, S.M.S.; Yari, M.; Rosen, M.A. Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles. Energy 2014, 65, 533–543. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesTurchi, C.S.; Ma, Z.; Neises, T.; Wagner, M. Thermodynamic Study of Advanced Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycles for High Performance Concentrating Solar Power Systems. In Proceedings of the ASME 2012 6th International Conference on Energy Sustainability Collocated with the ASME 2012 10th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology, San Diego, CA, USA, 23–26 July 2012; pp. 375–383.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLe Moullec, Y. Conceptual study of a high efficiency coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture using a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle. Energy 2013, 49, 32–46. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesOlumayegun, O.; Wang, M.; Oko, E. Thermodynamic performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 closed Brayton cycles for coal-fired power generation with solvent-based CO2 capture. Energy 2019, 166, 1074–1088. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesLiang, Y.; Bian, X.; Qian, W.; Pan, M.; Ban, Z.; Yu, Z. Theoretical analysis of a regenerative supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycle/organic Rankine cycle dual loop for waste heat recovery of a diesel/natural gas dual-fuel engine. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 197, 111845. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesKao, S.; Gibbs, J.; Hejzlar, P. Dynamic Simulation and Control of a Supercritical CO2 Power Conversion System for Small Light Water Reactor Applications. In Proceedings of the Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Symposium, Troy, NY, USA, 29–30 April 2009.en_US
dc.relation.referencesUusitalo, A.; Ameli, A.; Turunen-Saaresti, T. Thermodynamic and turbomachinery design analysis of supercritical Brayton cycles for exhaust gas heat recovery. Energy 2019, 167, 60–79. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesDanieli, P.; Rech, S.; Lazzaretto, A. Supercritical CO2 and air Brayton-Joule versus ORC systems for heat recovery from glass furnaces: Performance and economic evaluation. Energy 2019, 168, 295–309. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesThakar, R.; Bhosle, S.; Lahane, S. Design of Heat Exchanger for Waste Heat Recovery from Exhaust Gas of Diesel Engine. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 20, 372–376. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia, G.; Isaza-Roldan, C.; Forero, J. Economic and Exergo-Advance Analysis of a Waste Heat Recovery System based on Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle under Organic Fluids with Low Global Warming Potential. Energies 2020, 13, 1317.en_US
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, G.V.; Peñaloza, C.A.; Forero, J.D. Thermo-economic assessment of a gas microturbine-absorption chiller trigeneration system under different compressor inlet air temperatures. Energies 2019, 12, 4643. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia, G.; Peñaloza, C.; Rojas, J. Thermoeconomic Modelling and Parametric Study of a Simple ORC for the Recovery of Waste Heat in a 2 MW Gas Engine under Different Working Fluids. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4017. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, G.V.; Isaza-Roldan, C.; Forero, J.D. A phenomenological base semi-physical thermodynamic model for the cylinder and exhaust manifold of a natural gas 2-megawatt four-stroke internal combustion engine. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02700. [CrossRef] [PubMed]en_US
dc.relation.referencesFan, W.; Han, Z.; Li, P.; Jia, Y. Analysis of the thermodynamic performance of the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based on the characteristic parameters of the working fluid and criterion for working fluid selection. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 211, 112746. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesIso, T.; Standards, I. Environmental Management The ISO 14000 Family of International Standards ISO in Brief ISO and the Environment; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia Ochoa, G.; Cárdenas Gutierrez, J.; Duarte Forero, J. Exergy, Economic, and Life-Cycle Assessment of ORC System for Waste Heat Recovery in a Natural Gas Internal Combustion Engine. Resource 2020, 9, 2. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesMichos, C.N.; Lion, S.; Vlaskos, I.; Taccani, R. Analysis of the backpressure effect of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) evaporator on the exhaust line of a turbocharged heavy duty diesel power generator for marine applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 132, 347–360. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesASHRAE. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2010. Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, 62nd ed.; American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKe, H.; Xiao, Q.; Cao, Y.; Ma, T.; Lin, Y.; Zeng, M.; Wang, Q. Simulation of the printed circuit heat exchanger for S-CO2 by segmented methods. Energy Procedia 2017, 142, 4098–4103. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesDing, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, C.; Xu, X.; Li, Q.; Mao, L. Exergoenvironmental model of Organic Rankine Cycle system including the manufacture and leakage of working fluid. Energy 2018, 145, 52–64. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia Ochoa, G.; Piero Rojas, J.; Duarte Forero, J. Advance Exergo-Economic Analysis of a Waste Heat Recovery System Using ORC for a Bottoming Natural Gas Engine. Energies 2020, 13, 267. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia, G.; Duarte, J.; Isaza-Roldan, C. Thermoeconomic Analysis of Different Exhaust Waste-Heat Recovery Systems for Natural Gas Engine Based on ORC. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4017. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia Ochoa, G.; Acevedo Peñaloza, C.; Duarte Forero, J. Thermoeconomic optimization with PSO Algorithm of waste heat recovery systems based on Organic Rankine Cycle system for a natural gas engine. Energies 2019, 12, 4165. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPreißinger, M.; Brüggemann, D. Thermoeconomic Evaluation of Modular Organic Rankine Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery over a Broad Range of Heat Source Temperatures and Capacities. Energies 2017, 10, 269. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesTchanche, B.; Lambrinos, G.; Frangoudakis, A.; Papadakis, G. Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles-A review of various applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 3963–3979. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/en13092259en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record