| dc.contributor.author | Espinel Blanco, Edwin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Valencia Ochoa, Guillermo Eliécer | |
| dc.contributor.author | Duarte Forero, Jorge | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Colombia | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-19T15:58:31Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-19T15:58:31Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-06-21 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2079-9276 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6086 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Este artículo presenta la aplicación de un método de caracterización energética basado en la norma ISO 50001 en una planta de producción de papel seco. Esta planta opera utilizando electricidad, gas y carbón como fuentes de energía. Las dos últimas se utilizan para producir el vapor y el aire caliente empleados en el proceso de secado del papel. Mediante la caracterización energética, se calcularon indicadores como la línea base energética y los indicadores de consumo para la planta, con los que se identificaron oportunidades de mejora. Estas oportunidades se utilizaron como estudios de caso para cada fuente de energía empleada y se basaron en el estado actual de la planta. Se seleccionaron datos del método Midpoint+ ILCD de 2011 de la base de datos Ecoinvent, utilizando OpenLCA 1.7.0 para la evaluación energética. Las categorías de impacto analizadas en este estudio fueron la ecotoxicidad, la eutrofización de ríos y mares, el cambio climático y la toxicidad humana. Como resultado de este trabajo, se constató que era posible ahorrar energía ajustando la tasa de producción a un factor de carga del 77%, lo que implica un consumo de gas de 1,6 kWh/kg y un valor de 88,5 kg de CO₂ equivalente en la categoría de cambio climático. Además, se evaluaron algunas oportunidades de mejora tecnológica, tanto económicas como ambientales, como resultado de la estrategia de mejora sostenible implementada con gestión energética y análisis del ciclo de vida. El estudio de estas oportunidades tecnológicas demostró que, para lograr un proceso industrial sostenible, es importante tener en cuenta criterios energéticos, económicos y ambientales en la mejora continua del proceso de producción de papel. Asimismo, es fundamental analizar alternativas de cambio tecnológico que tengan un mayor impacto que las alternativas operativas, según criterios energéticos, ambientales y económicos. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.relation | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/6/75 | en_US |
| dc.title | Combinación de indicadores de gestión energética e indicadores de análisis del ciclo de vida para promover la sostenibilidad en una planta de producción de papel | en_US |
| dc.title.translated | Combining Energy Management Indicators and Life Cycle Assessment Indicators to Promote Sustainability in a Paper Production Plant | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | Edwin Espinel Blanco [0001200917] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | Guillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [0001129635] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | Jorge Duarte Forero [0001478424] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | Edwin Espinel Blanco [3ODKG4cAAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | Guillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [Gu-McaYAAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | Jorge Duarte Forero [51nyiJoAAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Edwin Espinel Blanco [0000-0003-4479-2874] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Guillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [0000-0001-5437-1964] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Jorge Duarte Forero [0000-0001-7345-9590] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | Edwin Espinel Blanco [57209774810] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | Guillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [57193428183] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | Jorge Duarte Forero [55804011500] | en_US |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | This paper presents the application of an energy characterization method based on the ISO
50001 standard in a dry paper production plant. This plant operates using electricity, gas, and coal
as energy sources. The last two energy sources are used to produce the steam and hot air used in
the paper drying process. Through energy characterization, indicators such as energy baseline and
consumption indicators were calculated for the plant, with which improvement opportunities were
identified. These improvement opportunities were used as case studies for each energy source used
and were based on the actual state of the plant. 2011 Midpoint+ ILCD method data was selected
from the Ecoinvent database, using OpenLCA 1.7.0 for the energy assessment. The impact categories
analyzed in this study were ecotoxicity, eutrophication of rivers and seas, climate change, and human
toxicity. As a result of this work, it was found that energy-saving was possible by adjusting the
production rate to a load factor of 77%, which implies a gas consumption of 1.6 kWh/kg and a
value in the climate change category of 88.5 kg of CO2 equivalent. In addition, some technological
improvement opportunities were economical and environmentally evaluated as a result of the
sustainable improvement strategy implemented with energy management and life cycle assessment.
The study of these technological opportunities showed that in order to achieve a sustainable industrial
process, it is important to take into account energy, economic, and environmental criteria in the
continuous improvement of the paper production process. In addition, it is of vital importance
to analyze alternatives for technological change, which have a greater impact than operational
alternatives according to energy, environmental and economic criteria. | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Sistema de gestión de la energía | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Norma ISO 50001 | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Indicadores de desempeño | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Análisis del ciclo de vida | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Sostenibilidad | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | energy management system | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | ISO 50001 standard | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | performance indicators | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | life cycle assessment | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | sustainability | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad ingenierías | en_US |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Osorio Zapata, E.M.; ONU (Organización de las Naciones Unidas); IDEAM; PNUD; MADS; DNP; CANCILLERÍA. Convención Marco sobre el Cambio Climático—PARIS. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2015, 21930, 40. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | UNIDO. Industrial Development Report 2011 Industrial Energy Efficiency for Sustainable Wealth Creation; UNIDO: Vienna, Austria, 2011; ISBN 9789211064483. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2019 with projections to 2050. Available online: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/ieo2019.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2020). | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | ICONTEC. Ntc-Iso 50001; ICONTEC: Bogota, Colombia, 2011; p. 24. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Akimoto, H. Global Air Quality and Pollution. Science 2003, 302, 1716–1719. [CrossRef] [PubMed] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Naciones Unidas. Acuerdo de París; Naciones Unidas: New York, NY, USA, 2015; p. 29. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Girbau-LListuella, F.; Díaz-González, F.; Sumper, A. Optimization of the operation of smart rural grids through a novel energy management system. Energies 2018, 11, 9. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Jovanovi´c, B.; Filipovi´c, J.; Baki´c, V. Energy management system implementation in Serbian manufacturing —Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 1144–1156. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Petrecca, G. Industrial Energy Management: Principles and Applications. Ind. Energy Manag. 1993, 49, 6221. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Jovanovi´c, B.; Filipovi´c, J. ISO 50001 standard-based energy management maturity model—Proposal and validation in industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 2744–2755. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Dall’O’, G.; Ferrari, S.; Bruni, E.; Bramonti, L. Effective implementation of ISO 50001: A case study on energy management for heating load reduction for a social building stock in Northern Italy. Energy Build. 2020, 219, 110029. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Gopalakrishnan, B.; Ramamoorthy, K.; Crowe, E.; Chaudhari, S.; Latif, H. A structured approach for facilitating the implementation of ISO 50001 standard in the manufacturing sector. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2014, 7, 154–165. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bonacina, F.; De Propris, L.; Marchegiani, A.; Mori, F. Industrial Energy Management Systems in Italy: State of the Art and Perspective. Energy Procedia 2015, 82, 562–569. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | van der Giesen, C.; Cucurachi, S.; Guinée, J.; Kramer, G.J.; Tukker, A. A critical view on the current application of LCA for new technologies and recommendations for improved practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120904. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Yilbas, B.S.; Shaukat, M.M.; Afzal, A.A.; Ashraf, F. Life cycle analysis for laser welding of alloys. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020, 126, 106064. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Cheng, G.; Zhao, Y.; Pan, S.; Wang, X.; Dong, C. A comparative life cycle analysis of wheat straw utilization modes in China. Energy 2020, 194, 116914. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ramírez, R.; Gutiérrez, A.S.; Eras, J.J.C.; Valencia, K.; Hernández, B.; Forero, J.D. Evaluation of the energy recovery potential of thermoelectric generators in diesel engines. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118412. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Orcesi, A.D.; Feraille, A.; Chataigner, S. Fatigue strengthening of steel structures using high modulus CFRP plates: Development of a life-cycle analysis approach. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 227, 116628. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Jullien, A.; Proust, C.; Yazoghli-Marzouk, O. LCA of alternative granular materials—Assessment of ecotoxicity and toxicty for road case studies. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 227, 116737. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Rahman, S.M.A.; Hachicha, A.A.; Ghenai, C.; Saidur, R.; Said, Z. Performance and life cycle analysis of a novel portable solar thermoelectric refrigerator. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2020, 19, 100599. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Restrepo, A.; Becerra, R.; Tibaquirá, J.E.G. Energetic and carbon footprint analysis in manufacturing process of bamboo boards in Colombia. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 126, 563–571. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Junnila, S. Life cycle management of energy-consuming products in companies using IO-LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2008, 13, 432. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Masternak-Janus, A.; Rybaczewska-Błazejowska, M. Life cycle analysis of tissue paper manufacturing from virgin pulp or recycled waste paper. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 2015, 6, 47–54. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Poopak, S.; Agamuthu, P. Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of paper making process in Iran. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 4860–4870. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Pelser, W.A.; Vosloo, J.C.; Mathews, M.J. Results and prospects of applying an ISO 50001 based reporting system on a cement plant. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 642–653. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Aitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1982, 44, 139–160. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Díaz de Junguitu, A.; Allur, E. The Adoption of Environmental Management Systems Based on ISO 14001, EMAS, and Alternative Models for SMEs: A Qualitative Empirical Study. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7015. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ochoa, G.V.; Rojas, J.P.; Forero, J.D. Advance Exergo-Economic Analysis of a Waste Heat Recovery System Using ORC for a Bottoming Natural Gas Engine. Energies 2020, 13, 267. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ren, J. Chapter 16—Integrated data Envelopment Analysis, Weighting Method and Life Cycle Thinking: A Quantitative Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Improvement; Ren, J., Toniolo, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 329–344. ISBN 978-0-12-818355-7. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Gençer, E.; O’Sullivan, F.M. A Framework for Multi-level Life Cycle Analysis of the Energy System. In 29 European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering; Kiss, A.A., Zondervan, E., Lakerveld, R., Özkan, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 46, pp. 763–768. ISBN 1570-7946. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Valencia, G.; Cardenas-Gutierrez, J.; Forero, J. Exergy, Economic, and Life-Cycle Assessment of ORC System for Waste Heat Recovery in a Natural Gas Internal Combustion Engine. Resources 2020, 9, 2. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Zhou, Z.; Tang, Y.; Chi, Y.; Ni, M.; Buekens, A. Waste-to-energy: A review of life cycle assessment and its extension methods. Waste Manag. Res. 2017, 36, 3–16. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Valencia, G.; Benavides, A.; Cárdenas, Y. Economic and environmental multiobjective optimization of a wind-solar-fuel cell hybrid energy system in the Colombian Caribbean region. Energies 2019, 12, 2119. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | McClelland, S.C.; Arndt, C.; Gordon, D.R.; Thoma, G. Type and number of environmental impact categories used in livestock life cycle assessment: A systematic review. Livest. Sci. 2018, 209, 39–45. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Morales, A.; Valencia, G.E.; Cardenas, Y.D. Identification of energy saving potential in steam boiler through an ISO Identification of energy saving potential in steam boiler through an ISO 50001 standard. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1126, 1–7. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Navajas, A.; Uriarte, L.; Gandía, L.M. Application of eco-design and life cycle assessment standards for environmental impact reduction of an industrial product. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1724. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Poveda-Orjuela, P.P.; García-Díaz, J.C.; Pulido-Rojano, A.; Cañón-Zabala, G. ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus. Energies 2019, 12, 4700. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ochoa, G.V.; Peñaloza, C.A.; Rojas, J.P. Thermoeconomic modelling and parametric study of a simple orc for the recovery ofwaste heat in a 2 MW gas engine under differentworking fluids. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4256. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Valencia, G.; Peñaloza, C.; Forero, J. Thermo-Economic Assessment of a Gas Microturbine-Absorption Chiller Trigeneration System under Different Compressor Inlet Air Temperatures. Energies 2019, 12, 4643. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Tong, L.; Pu, Z.; Ma, J. Maintenance Supplier Evaluation and Selection for Safe and Sustainable Production in the Chemical Industry: A Case Study. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1533. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Aymard, V.; Botta-Genoulaz, V. Normalisation in life-cycle assessment: Consequences of new European factors on decision-making. Supply Chain. Forum 2017, 18, 76–83. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Munshi, A.; Gaster, B.; Mattson, T.G.; Ginsburg, D. OpenCL Programming Guide; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2011; ISBN 0132594552. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ochoa, G.V.; Isaza-Roldan, C.; Forero, J.D. A phenomenological base semi-physical thermodynamic model for the cylinder and exhaust manifold of a natural gas 2-megawatt four-stroke internal combustion engine. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02700. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Piero Rojas, J.; Valencia Ochoa, G.; Duarte Forero, J. Comparative Performance of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Generation System with Dynamic Load Demand. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3093. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Valencia, G.; Duarte, J.; Isaza-Roldan, C. Thermo-economic analysis of different exhaust waste-heat recovery systems for natural gas engine based on ORC. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4071. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Alibaba, M.; Pourdarbani, R.; Hasan, M.; Manesh, K.; Valencia, G.; Duarte, J. Thermodynamic, exergo-economic and exergo-environmental analysis of hybrid geothermal-solar power plant based on ORC cycle using emergy concept. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03758. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.identifier.DOI | https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9060075 | en_US |