Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEspinel Blanco, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorValencia Ochoa, Guillermo Eliécer
dc.contributor.authorDuarte Forero, Jorge
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-19T15:58:31Z
dc.date.available2025-11-19T15:58:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-21
dc.identifier.issn2079-9276en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6086
dc.description.abstractEste artículo presenta la aplicación de un método de caracterización energética basado en la norma ISO 50001 en una planta de producción de papel seco. Esta planta opera utilizando electricidad, gas y carbón como fuentes de energía. Las dos últimas se utilizan para producir el vapor y el aire caliente empleados en el proceso de secado del papel. Mediante la caracterización energética, se calcularon indicadores como la línea base energética y los indicadores de consumo para la planta, con los que se identificaron oportunidades de mejora. Estas oportunidades se utilizaron como estudios de caso para cada fuente de energía empleada y se basaron en el estado actual de la planta. Se seleccionaron datos del método Midpoint+ ILCD de 2011 de la base de datos Ecoinvent, utilizando OpenLCA 1.7.0 para la evaluación energética. Las categorías de impacto analizadas en este estudio fueron la ecotoxicidad, la eutrofización de ríos y mares, el cambio climático y la toxicidad humana. Como resultado de este trabajo, se constató que era posible ahorrar energía ajustando la tasa de producción a un factor de carga del 77%, lo que implica un consumo de gas de 1,6 kWh/kg y un valor de 88,5 kg de CO₂ equivalente en la categoría de cambio climático. Además, se evaluaron algunas oportunidades de mejora tecnológica, tanto económicas como ambientales, como resultado de la estrategia de mejora sostenible implementada con gestión energética y análisis del ciclo de vida. El estudio de estas oportunidades tecnológicas demostró que, para lograr un proceso industrial sostenible, es importante tener en cuenta criterios energéticos, económicos y ambientales en la mejora continua del proceso de producción de papel. Asimismo, es fundamental analizar alternativas de cambio tecnológico que tengan un mayor impacto que las alternativas operativas, según criterios energéticos, ambientales y económicos.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relationhttps://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/9/6/75en_US
dc.titleCombinación de indicadores de gestión energética e indicadores de análisis del ciclo de vida para promover la sostenibilidad en una planta de producción de papelen_US
dc.title.translatedCombining Energy Management Indicators and Life Cycle Assessment Indicators to Promote Sustainability in a Paper Production Planten_US
dc.contributor.cvlacEdwin Espinel Blanco [0001200917]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacGuillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [0001129635]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacJorge Duarte Forero [0001478424]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarEdwin Espinel Blanco [3ODKG4cAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarGuillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [Gu-McaYAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarJorge Duarte Forero [51nyiJoAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidEdwin Espinel Blanco [0000-0003-4479-2874]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidGuillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [0000-0001-5437-1964]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidJorge Duarte Forero [0000-0001-7345-9590]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusEdwin Espinel Blanco [57209774810]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusGuillermo Eliécer Valencia Ochoa [57193428183]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusJorge Duarte Forero [55804011500]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishThis paper presents the application of an energy characterization method based on the ISO 50001 standard in a dry paper production plant. This plant operates using electricity, gas, and coal as energy sources. The last two energy sources are used to produce the steam and hot air used in the paper drying process. Through energy characterization, indicators such as energy baseline and consumption indicators were calculated for the plant, with which improvement opportunities were identified. These improvement opportunities were used as case studies for each energy source used and were based on the actual state of the plant. 2011 Midpoint+ ILCD method data was selected from the Ecoinvent database, using OpenLCA 1.7.0 for the energy assessment. The impact categories analyzed in this study were ecotoxicity, eutrophication of rivers and seas, climate change, and human toxicity. As a result of this work, it was found that energy-saving was possible by adjusting the production rate to a load factor of 77%, which implies a gas consumption of 1.6 kWh/kg and a value in the climate change category of 88.5 kg of CO2 equivalent. In addition, some technological improvement opportunities were economical and environmentally evaluated as a result of the sustainable improvement strategy implemented with energy management and life cycle assessment. The study of these technological opportunities showed that in order to achieve a sustainable industrial process, it is important to take into account energy, economic, and environmental criteria in the continuous improvement of the paper production process. In addition, it is of vital importance to analyze alternatives for technological change, which have a greater impact than operational alternatives according to energy, environmental and economic criteria.en_US
dc.subject.proposalSistema de gestión de la energíaen_US
dc.subject.proposalNorma ISO 50001en_US
dc.subject.proposalIndicadores de desempeñoen_US
dc.subject.proposalAnálisis del ciclo de vidaen_US
dc.subject.proposalSostenibilidaden_US
dc.subject.keywordsenergy management systemen_US
dc.subject.keywordsISO 50001 standarden_US
dc.subject.keywordsperformance indicatorsen_US
dc.subject.keywordslife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordssustainabilityen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesOsorio Zapata, E.M.; ONU (Organización de las Naciones Unidas); IDEAM; PNUD; MADS; DNP; CANCILLERÍA. Convención Marco sobre el Cambio Climático—PARIS. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2015, 21930, 40.en_US
dc.relation.referencesUNIDO. Industrial Development Report 2011 Industrial Energy Efficiency for Sustainable Wealth Creation; UNIDO: Vienna, Austria, 2011; ISBN 9789211064483.en_US
dc.relation.referencesU.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Outlook 2019 with projections to 2050. Available online: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/ieo2019.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2020).en_US
dc.relation.referencesICONTEC. Ntc-Iso 50001; ICONTEC: Bogota, Colombia, 2011; p. 24.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAkimoto, H. Global Air Quality and Pollution. Science 2003, 302, 1716–1719. [CrossRef] [PubMed]en_US
dc.relation.referencesNaciones Unidas. Acuerdo de París; Naciones Unidas: New York, NY, USA, 2015; p. 29.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGirbau-LListuella, F.; Díaz-González, F.; Sumper, A. Optimization of the operation of smart rural grids through a novel energy management system. Energies 2018, 11, 9. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesJovanovi´c, B.; Filipovi´c, J.; Baki´c, V. Energy management system implementation in Serbian manufacturing —Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 162, 1144–1156. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPetrecca, G. Industrial Energy Management: Principles and Applications. Ind. Energy Manag. 1993, 49, 6221.en_US
dc.relation.referencesJovanovi´c, B.; Filipovi´c, J. ISO 50001 standard-based energy management maturity model—Proposal and validation in industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 2744–2755. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesDall’O’, G.; Ferrari, S.; Bruni, E.; Bramonti, L. Effective implementation of ISO 50001: A case study on energy management for heating load reduction for a social building stock in Northern Italy. Energy Build. 2020, 219, 110029. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesGopalakrishnan, B.; Ramamoorthy, K.; Crowe, E.; Chaudhari, S.; Latif, H. A structured approach for facilitating the implementation of ISO 50001 standard in the manufacturing sector. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2014, 7, 154–165. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesBonacina, F.; De Propris, L.; Marchegiani, A.; Mori, F. Industrial Energy Management Systems in Italy: State of the Art and Perspective. Energy Procedia 2015, 82, 562–569. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesvan der Giesen, C.; Cucurachi, S.; Guinée, J.; Kramer, G.J.; Tukker, A. A critical view on the current application of LCA for new technologies and recommendations for improved practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120904. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesYilbas, B.S.; Shaukat, M.M.; Afzal, A.A.; Ashraf, F. Life cycle analysis for laser welding of alloys. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020, 126, 106064. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesCheng, G.; Zhao, Y.; Pan, S.; Wang, X.; Dong, C. A comparative life cycle analysis of wheat straw utilization modes in China. Energy 2020, 194, 116914. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesRamírez, R.; Gutiérrez, A.S.; Eras, J.J.C.; Valencia, K.; Hernández, B.; Forero, J.D. Evaluation of the energy recovery potential of thermoelectric generators in diesel engines. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118412. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesOrcesi, A.D.; Feraille, A.; Chataigner, S. Fatigue strengthening of steel structures using high modulus CFRP plates: Development of a life-cycle analysis approach. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 227, 116628. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesJullien, A.; Proust, C.; Yazoghli-Marzouk, O. LCA of alternative granular materials—Assessment of ecotoxicity and toxicty for road case studies. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 227, 116737. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesRahman, S.M.A.; Hachicha, A.A.; Ghenai, C.; Saidur, R.; Said, Z. Performance and life cycle analysis of a novel portable solar thermoelectric refrigerator. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2020, 19, 100599. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesRestrepo, A.; Becerra, R.; Tibaquirá, J.E.G. Energetic and carbon footprint analysis in manufacturing process of bamboo boards in Colombia. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 126, 563–571. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesJunnila, S. Life cycle management of energy-consuming products in companies using IO-LCA. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2008, 13, 432. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesMasternak-Janus, A.; Rybaczewska-Błazejowska, M. Life cycle analysis of tissue paper manufacturing from virgin pulp or recycled waste paper. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 2015, 6, 47–54. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPoopak, S.; Agamuthu, P. Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) of paper making process in Iran. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 4860–4870.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPelser, W.A.; Vosloo, J.C.; Mathews, M.J. Results and prospects of applying an ISO 50001 based reporting system on a cement plant. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 642–653. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1982, 44, 139–160. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesDíaz de Junguitu, A.; Allur, E. The Adoption of Environmental Management Systems Based on ISO 14001, EMAS, and Alternative Models for SMEs: A Qualitative Empirical Study. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7015. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, G.V.; Rojas, J.P.; Forero, J.D. Advance Exergo-Economic Analysis of a Waste Heat Recovery System Using ORC for a Bottoming Natural Gas Engine. Energies 2020, 13, 267. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesRen, J. Chapter 16—Integrated data Envelopment Analysis, Weighting Method and Life Cycle Thinking: A Quantitative Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Improvement; Ren, J., Toniolo, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 329–344. ISBN 978-0-12-818355-7.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGençer, E.; O’Sullivan, F.M. A Framework for Multi-level Life Cycle Analysis of the Energy System. In 29 European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering; Kiss, A.A., Zondervan, E., Lakerveld, R., Özkan, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 46, pp. 763–768. ISBN 1570-7946.en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia, G.; Cardenas-Gutierrez, J.; Forero, J. Exergy, Economic, and Life-Cycle Assessment of ORC System for Waste Heat Recovery in a Natural Gas Internal Combustion Engine. Resources 2020, 9, 2. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhou, Z.; Tang, Y.; Chi, Y.; Ni, M.; Buekens, A. Waste-to-energy: A review of life cycle assessment and its extension methods. Waste Manag. Res. 2017, 36, 3–16. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia, G.; Benavides, A.; Cárdenas, Y. Economic and environmental multiobjective optimization of a wind-solar-fuel cell hybrid energy system in the Colombian Caribbean region. Energies 2019, 12, 2119. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesMcClelland, S.C.; Arndt, C.; Gordon, D.R.; Thoma, G. Type and number of environmental impact categories used in livestock life cycle assessment: A systematic review. Livest. Sci. 2018, 209, 39–45. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesMorales, A.; Valencia, G.E.; Cardenas, Y.D. Identification of energy saving potential in steam boiler through an ISO Identification of energy saving potential in steam boiler through an ISO 50001 standard. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1126, 1–7. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesNavajas, A.; Uriarte, L.; Gandía, L.M. Application of eco-design and life cycle assessment standards for environmental impact reduction of an industrial product. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1724. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPoveda-Orjuela, P.P.; García-Díaz, J.C.; Pulido-Rojano, A.; Cañón-Zabala, G. ISO 50001: 2018 and Its Application in a Comprehensive Management System with an Energy-Performance Focus. Energies 2019, 12, 4700. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, G.V.; Peñaloza, C.A.; Rojas, J.P. Thermoeconomic modelling and parametric study of a simple orc for the recovery ofwaste heat in a 2 MW gas engine under differentworking fluids. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4256. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia, G.; Peñaloza, C.; Forero, J. Thermo-Economic Assessment of a Gas Microturbine-Absorption Chiller Trigeneration System under Different Compressor Inlet Air Temperatures. Energies 2019, 12, 4643. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesTong, L.; Pu, Z.; Ma, J. Maintenance Supplier Evaluation and Selection for Safe and Sustainable Production in the Chemical Industry: A Case Study. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1533. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAymard, V.; Botta-Genoulaz, V. Normalisation in life-cycle assessment: Consequences of new European factors on decision-making. Supply Chain. Forum 2017, 18, 76–83. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesMunshi, A.; Gaster, B.; Mattson, T.G.; Ginsburg, D. OpenCL Programming Guide; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2011; ISBN 0132594552.en_US
dc.relation.referencesOchoa, G.V.; Isaza-Roldan, C.; Forero, J.D. A phenomenological base semi-physical thermodynamic model for the cylinder and exhaust manifold of a natural gas 2-megawatt four-stroke internal combustion engine. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02700. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPiero Rojas, J.; Valencia Ochoa, G.; Duarte Forero, J. Comparative Performance of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Generation System with Dynamic Load Demand. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3093. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesValencia, G.; Duarte, J.; Isaza-Roldan, C. Thermo-economic analysis of different exhaust waste-heat recovery systems for natural gas engine based on ORC. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 4071. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAlibaba, M.; Pourdarbani, R.; Hasan, M.; Manesh, K.; Valencia, G.; Duarte, J. Thermodynamic, exergo-economic and exergo-environmental analysis of hybrid geothermal-solar power plant based on ORC cycle using emergy concept. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03758. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/resources9060075en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record