Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEspinel Blanco, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorFlórez Solano, Eder Norberto
dc.contributor.authorArévalo Ruedas, José Humberto
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-18T16:20:40Z
dc.date.available2025-11-18T16:20:40Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-22
dc.identifier.issn1742-6596en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6072
dc.description.abstractUn componente de ingeniería se considera físicamente inoperativo cuando falla o presenta condiciones que le impiden operar y sufre una falla funcional. Los tiempos útiles u operativos y los tiempos de inactividad o de parada se recopilan para determinar la confiabilidad o la probabilidad de operación del componente durante un período. El uso de distribuciones es el método más aceptado para determinar la confiabilidad de un componente. Entre las principales distribuciones utilizadas se encuentran la exponencial, la lognormal, la de Weibull, etc. La distribución de Weibull se utiliza ampliamente para estimar la confiabilidad de un componente, entendida como la capacidad física del elemento para funcionar según los parámetros operativos. Se realizó un estudio de tres modelos basados ​​en modificaciones de la distribución de Weibull para determinar la confiabilidad de componentes reparables sujetos a actividades de mantenimiento. Dos modelos representan la función de Weibull modificada con dos parámetros y un modelo adicional representa la función de Weibull transformada con una función de tasa de falla que se ajusta a la curva de Davies. Se presentan las características, la interpretación física, las aplicaciones y la viabilidad de utilizar cada modelo en el análisis de confiabilidad de elementos reparables en ingeniería.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relationhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1981/1/012011/metaen_US
dc.titleEstudio de la función de Weibull modificada para analizar la fiabilidad en componentes de ingeniería que fallan y son reparables.en_US
dc.title.translatedStudy of the modified Weibull function to analyze reliability in engineering components that fail and are repairableen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacEdwin Espinel Blanco [0001200917]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacEder Norberto Flórez Solano [0000668125]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacJosé Humberto Arévalo Ruedas [0000056272]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarEdwin Espinel Blanco [3ODKG4cAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarEder Norberto Flórez Solano [kjgjoYkAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarJosé Humberto Arévalo Ruedas [cmXTAEMAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidEdwin Espinel Blanco [0000-0003-4479-2874]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidEder Norberto Flórez Solano [0000-0003-2527-0413]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidJosé Humberto Arévalo Ruedas [0000-0003-4672-4533]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateEder Norberto Flórez Solano [Norberto-Florez-Solano]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusEdwin Espinel Blanco [57209774810]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishAn engineering component is physically inoperative when it fails or has conditions that prevent it from operating and has a functional failure. The useful or operating times and the non-operating or downtimes are collected to determine the reliability or the probability of operation of the component during a period. The use of distributions is the most accepted method for determining component reliability. Among the main distributions used are the exponential, Log Normal, Weibull, etc. The Weibull distribution is widely used to estimate the reliability of a component, understood as the physical capacity of the element to function according to operating parameters. A study of three models based on Weibull modifications was conducted to determine the reliability of repairable components subject to maintenance activities. Two models represent the modified Weibull function with two parameters and an additional model that represents the Weibull function transmuted with failure rate function that fits the Davies curve. The characteristics, the physical interpretation, the applications, and the feasibility of using each model in analysis of reliability in elements and repairable in engineering are presented.en_US
dc.subject.proposalfunción de Weibullen_US
dc.subject.proposalanalizar la fiabilidaden_US
dc.subject.proposalcomponentes de ingenieríaen_US
dc.subject.keywordsWeibull functionen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAnalyze reliabilityen_US
dc.subject.keywordsEngineering componentsen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesLima E, Mc Mahon P, Cabral A 2021 Establishing the relationship between asset management and business performance International Journal of Production Economics 232 107937en_US
dc.relation.referencesParra C, González V, Candón E, Crespo A 2021 Integration of asset management standard ISO55000 with a maintenance management model 14th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management WCEAM Proceedings (Singapore: Springer Cham) pp 189-200en_US
dc.relation.referencesCevasco D, Koukoura S, Kolios A 2021 Reliability, availability, maintainability data review for the identification of trends in offshore wind energy applications Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 136 110414en_US
dc.relation.referencesMora L 2009 Mantenimiento Planeación, Ejecución y Control (Bogotá: Alfaomega Colombia S.A)en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang Q, You F, Bai F 2020 maintenance strategy for multi-component systems based on structure and reliability 11th International Conference on Prognostics and System Health Management (PHM-2020 Jinan) (Jinan: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) pp 309-314en_US
dc.relation.referencesTsarouhas P 2018 Reliability, availability and maintainability (RAM) analysis for wine packaging production line International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 35(3) 821-842en_US
dc.relation.referencesPanagiotis T 2012 Reliability, availability and maintainability analysis in food production lines: a review International Journal of Food Science and Technology 14(11) 2243-2251en_US
dc.relation.referencesXie M, Lai C 1996 Reliability analysis using an additive Weibull model with bathtub-shaped failure rate function Reliability Engineering & System Safety 52(1) 87-93en_US
dc.relation.referencesUsgaonkar S, Mariappan V 2009 Additive Weibull model for reliability analysis International Journal of Performability Engineering 5(3) 243-250en_US
dc.relation.referencesLai C, Xie M, Murthy D 2003 A modified Weibull distribution IEEE Transactions on Reliability 52(1) 33-37en_US
dc.relation.referencesLai C, Moore T, Xie M 1998 The beta integrated failure model Conference: International Workshop on Reliability Modelling and Analysis - From Theory to Practice 9 153-159en_US
dc.relation.referencesMuhammad S, King R 2013 Transmuted modified weibull distribution: a generalization of the modified weibull probability distribution European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 6(1) 66-88en_US
dc.relation.referencesXie M, Tang Y, Goh T 2002 A modified Weibull extension with bathtub-shaped failure rate function Reliability Engineering & System Safety 76(3) 279-285en_US
dc.identifier.DOI10.1088/1742-6596/1981/1/012011en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record