Show simple item record

Universidad inteligente: Factores claves para la adopción de internet de las cosas y big data

dc.contributor.authorRico Bautista, Dewar
dc.contributor.authorMaestre Góngora, Gina
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero, Cesar
dc.contributor.authorMedina Cárdenas, Yurley
dc.contributor.authorAreniz Arévalo, Yesenia
dc.contributor.authorSanchez Velasquez, María Camila
dc.contributor.authorBarrientos Avendaño, Edwin
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-22T21:37:32Z
dc.date.available2025-10-22T21:37:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-01
dc.identifier.issn1646-9895en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5893
dc.description.abstractEl concepto de universidad inteligente es emergente, fuertemente anclado a las tecnologías inteligentes, y considerado por diferentes autores. Las organizaciones, incluidas las universidades, necesitan incorporar las tecnologías inteligentes para aprovechar las capacidades que proporcionan para transformar sus procesos e impulsarlas hacia nuevos modelos organizativos. Una universidad inteligente se centra en la mejora de su infraestructura tecnológica para alcanzar sus objetivos de calidad educativa. Este trabajo presenta los factores clave para la adopción de dos tecnologías inteligentes: Big Data y el Internet de las Cosas. Esta caracterización e integración permite concluir sobre la necesidad de alineación de la tecnología con los procesos de la organización, exigiendo una mayor interacción con la alta dirección.en_US
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.relationhttps://scielo.pt/pdf/rist/n41/1646-9895-rist-41-63.pdfen_US
dc.titleUniversidad inteligente: Factores claves para la adopción de internet de las cosas y big dataen_US
dc.title.translatedSmart University: Key Factors for the Adoption of the Internet of Things and Big Dataen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacDewar Rico Bautista [0000255815]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacGina Maestre Góngora [0001087002]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacYurley Medina Cárdenas [0001355232]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacYesenia Areniz Arévalo [0000003484]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacMaría Camila Sánchez Velasquez [0001847085]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacEdwin Barrientos Avendaño [0001200968]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarDewar Rico Bautista [q_ZtKjsAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarGina Maestre Góngora [-EfDLGsAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarCesar Guerrero [_YgBOOcAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarYurley Medina Cárdenas [8osAHUkAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarYesenia Areniz Arévalo [x6EsMucAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarMaría Camila Sánchez Velasquez [9U5hLWkAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarEdwin Barrientos Avendaño [mRBzDcAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidDewar Rico Bautista [0000-0002-1808-3874]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidGina Maestre Góngora [0000-0002-2880-9245]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidYurley Medina Cárdenas [0000-0002-2772-3220]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidYesenia Areniz Arévalo [0000-0003-3943-1978]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidMaría Camila Sánchez Velasquez [0000-0001-5496-4655]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidEdwin Barrientos Avendaño [0000-0002-4126-5246]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateDewar Rico Bautista [Dewar-Rico-Bautista]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateGina Maestre Góngora [Gina-Maestre]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateYurley Medina Cárdenas [Yurley-Medina-Cardenas]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateYesenia Areniz Arévalo [Yesenia-Arevalo-2]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateCesar Guerrero [Cesar-Guerrero-2]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateMaría Camila Sánchez Velasquez [Maria-Sanchez-199]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateEdwin Barrientos Avendaño [Edwin_Barrientos-Avendano]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusDewar Rico Bautista [58689228900]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusGina Maestre Góngora [57195627290]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusYurley Medina Cárdenas [56521663500]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusYesenia Areniz Arévalo [57209774717]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusCesar Guerrero [23094317500]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusMaría Camila Sánchez Velasquez [57320998200]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusEdwin Barrientos Avendaño [57205700531]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishThe concept of a smart university is emerging, strongly anchored to smart technologies, and considered by different authors. Organizations, including universities need to incorporate smart technologies to take advantage of the capabilities they provide to transform their processes and driving them toward new organizational models. A Smart University focuses on improving its technological infrastructure for achieving their quality educational goals. This paper presents the key factors for adopting two smart technologies: Big Data and the Internet of Things. This characterization and integration allow us to conclude about the need for technology alignment with the organization’s processes, demanding more interaction with the high management.en_US
dc.subject.proposalBig Dataen_US
dc.subject.proposalCaracterizaciónen_US
dc.subject.proposalInternet de las cosasen_US
dc.subject.proposalTecnologías inteligentesen_US
dc.subject.proposalUniversidad inteligenteen_US
dc.subject.keywordsBig Dataen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCharacterizationen_US
dc.subject.keywordsInternet of Thingsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSmart technologiesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSmart universityen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesAbushakra, A., & Nikbin, D. (2019). Extending the UTAUT2 Model to Understand the Entrepreneur Acceptance and Adopting Internet of Things ( IoT ). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21451-7en_US
dc.relation.referencesAkhri, O., El Idrissi, Y., & Hmina, N. (2019). Enabling smart collaboration with smart university services. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331453.3361311en_US
dc.relation.referencesAl-Momani, A. M., Mahmoud, M. A., & Ahmad, M. S. (2018). Factors that Influence the Acceptance of Internet of Things Services by Customers of Telecommunication Companies in Jordan. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 30(4), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2018100104en_US
dc.relation.referencesAl-Momani, A. M., Mahmoud, M. A., & Ahmad, M. S. (2019). A Review of Factors Influencing Customer Acceptance of Internet of Things Services. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 11(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJISSS.2019010104en_US
dc.relation.referencesAl-Ruithe, M., Benkhelifa, E., & Hameed, K. (2017). Current State of Cloud Computing Adoption – An Empirical Study in Major Public Sector Organizations of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Procedia Computer Science, 110, 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procs.2017.06.080en_US
dc.relation.referencesArpaci, I. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of cloud computing adoption in education to achieve knowledge management. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.024en_US
dc.relation.referencesAune, T. K., Gjestland, H., Haagensen, J. O., Kittilsen, B., Skar, J. I., & Westengen, H. (2003). Magnesium Alloys. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (pp. 1–19). Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007. a15_581en_US
dc.relation.referencesAuthors, F. (2016). An exploratory study of Internet of Things ( IoT ) adoption intention in logistics and supply chain management - a mixed research approach.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAuthors, F. (2018). Adoption of internet of things ( IOT ) based wearables for elderly healthcare – a behavioural reasoning theory ( BRT ) approach. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-12-2017-0048en_US
dc.relation.referencesBaA¡kovA¡, R., StrukovA¡, Z., & KozlovskA¡, M. (2020). Construction Cost Saving Through Adoption of IoT Applications in Concrete Works. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 47, 452–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27011-7_57en_US
dc.relation.referencesBerdnikova, L. F., Sherstobitova, A. A., Schnaider, O. V., Mikhalenok, N. O., & Medvedeva, O. E. (2019). Smart university: Assessment models for resources and economic potential. In Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (Vol. 144). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8260-4_51en_US
dc.relation.referencesBrous, P., Janssen, M., & Herder, P. (2020). The dual effects of the Internet of Things (IoT): A systematic review of the benefits and risks of IoT adoption by organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 101952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.008en_US
dc.relation.referencesChoix, R. A., Perez, R. R., & Parra, M. E. L. (2015). Factores determinantes en la adopción de tecnologías de información (TI) en las pymes. VinculaTégica EFAN, 1(1), 806–828. http://eprints.uanl.mx/17205/1/44.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesDas, S. (2019). The Early Bird Catches the Worm - First Mover Advantage through IoT Adoption for Indian Public Sector Retail Oil Outlets. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2019.1679588en_US
dc.relation.referencesFahmideh, M., & Zowghi, D. (2020). An exploration of IoT platform development. Information Systems, 87, 101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2019.06.005en_US
dc.relation.referencesFrasquet Deltoro, M., Mollá Descals, A., & Ruiz Molina, M. E. (2012). Factores determinantes y consecuencias de la adopción del comercio electrónico B2C:una comparativa internacional. Estudios Gerenciales, 28(123), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(12)70207-3en_US
dc.relation.referencesGonzález Arza, E. (2013). Validación de la Teoría Unificada de Aceptación y Uso de la Tecnología UTAUT en castellano en el ámbito de las consultas externas de la Red de Salud Mental de Bizkaia. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. http://hdl.handle. net/10609/19284en_US
dc.relation.referencesGrandón, E. E., Ibarra, A. A., Bío-Bío, U., Ramirez-Correa, P., & Alfaro-Pérez, J. (2020). Internet de las Cosas : Factores que influyen su adopción en Pymes chilenas.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKang, S., Rn, H. B., Jung, E., & Hwang, H. (2019). Survey on the demand for adoption of Internet of Things ( IoT ) -based services in hospitals : Investigation of nurses’ perception in a tertiary university hospital. Applied Nursing Research, 47(May 2018), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2019.03.005en_US
dc.relation.referencesKao, Y.-S., Nawata, K., & Huang, C.-Y. (2019). An Exploration and Confirmation of the Factors Influencing Adoption of IoT-Based Wearable Fitness Trackers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183227en_US
dc.relation.referencesKumar, U. D. (2019). Analytics Education. In IIMB Management Review. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.10.014en_US
dc.relation.referencesLópez Cabrera, M. V., Hernandez-Rangel, E., Mejía Mejía, G. P., & Cerano Fuentes, J. L. (2019). Factores que facilitan la adopción de tecnología educativa en escuelas de medicina. Educación Médica, 20, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. edumed.2017.07.006en_US
dc.relation.referencesLuzardo Briceño, M., Sandia Saldivia, B. E., Aguilar Jiménez, A. S., Macias Martínez, M., & Herrera Díaz, J. (2017). Factores que influyen en la adopción de las Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación por parte de las universidades. Dimensión Enseñanza-Aprendizaje. Educere, 21(68), 143–153. https://www.redalyc.org/ pdf/356/35652744018.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesMaciá, F. (2017). Smart University. Hacia una universidad más abierta. Primera.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMalheiros, V., Hohn, E., Pinho, R., Mendonca, M., & Maldonado, J. C. (2007). A Visual Text Mining approach for Systematic Reviews. First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.21en_US
dc.relation.referencesMartín García, A. V., García del Dujo, Á., & Muñoz Rodríguez, J. M. (2014). Factores determinantes de adopción de blended learning en educación superior. Adaptación del modelo UTAUT. Educación XXI, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/ educxx1.17.2.11489en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedina-Cárdenas, Y. C., & Rico-Bautista, D. (2016). Strategic alignment under a technology management organizational approach: ITIL & ISO 20000. Revista Tecnura, 20(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487638.11681en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedina-Cárdenas, Y., & Rico- Bautista, D. (2009). Modelo de gestión basado en el ciclo de vida del servicio de la Biblioteca de Infraestructura de Tecnologías de Información ( ITIL ). Revista Virtual Universidad Católica Del Norte, 27, 1–21. 148.215.2.11/redalyc-seam/articulo.oa?id=194215432010en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedina-Cárdenas, Y., & Rico-Bautista, D. (2008). Model of Administration of Services for the Universidad of Pamplona: ITIL. Scientia et Technica XIV, 14(39), 314–319.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedina-Cárdenas, Y., & Rico-Bautista, D. (2012). Mejores prácticas de gestión para la calidad de los servicios en tecnologías de información. Gerencia Tecnológica Informática, 11(29), 47–58.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedina Cárdenas, Y. C., Areniz Arévalo, Y., & Rico Bautista, D. W. (2016). Modelo estratégico para la gestión tecnológica en la organización: plan táctico de la calidad (ITIL & ISO 20000). In Fondo editorial ITM (Vol. 1). Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano. https://doi.org/10.22430/9789585414006en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedina, Y., Rico, D., & Areniz, Y. (2015). La apropiación del direccionamiento estratégico: una cuestión de competencias organizacionales. Revista Face, 2(1794–9920), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.24054/01204211.v2.n2.2015.1617en_US
dc.relation.referencesMital, M., Chang, V., Choudhary, P., Papa, A., & Pani, A. K. (2018). Adoption of Internet of Things in India: A test of competing models using a structured equation modeling approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.001en_US
dc.relation.referencesMourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., & Milas, N. (2016). Industrial Big Data as a Result of IoT Adoption in Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 55, 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. procir.2016.07.038en_US
dc.relation.referencesNasir, U., & Niazi, M. (2011). Cloud computing adoption assessment model (CAAM). Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement - Profes ’11, 44(0), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181101.2181110en_US
dc.relation.referencesNikbin, D., & Abushakra, A. (2019). Internet of Things Adoption: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Country. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (pp. 348–352). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21451-7_30en_US
dc.relation.referencesNikolopoulos, F. (2017). Using UTAUT2 for Cloud Computing Technology Acceptance Modeling.en_US
dc.relation.referencesNjenga, K., Garg, L., Bhardwaj, A. K., Prakash, V., & Bawa, S. (2019). The cloud computing adoption in higher learning institutions in Kenya: Hindering factors and recommendations for the way forward. Telematics and Informatics, 38(May), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.007en_US
dc.relation.referencesPalos-Sanchez, P., Reyes-Menendez, A., & Saura, J. R. (2019). Models of adoption of information technology and cloud computing in organizations. Informacion Tecnologica, 30(3), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642019000300003en_US
dc.relation.referencesPandey, R., & Verma, M. (2020). Current Emerging Trends in IOT : A Survey and Future Prospects. 8(Iii), 339–344.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPetersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, EASE 2008. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ EASE2008.8en_US
dc.relation.referencesPinheiro, P., Aparicio, M., & Costa, C. (2014). Adoption of cloud computing systems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication - ISDOC ’14, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1145/2618168.2618188en_US
dc.relation.referencesPornphol, P., & Tongkeo, T. (2018). Transformation from a traditional university into a smart university. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information and Education Technology, 144–148. https://doi.org/10.1145/3178158.3178167en_US
dc.relation.referencesPriyadarshinee, P., Raut, R. D., Jha, M. K., & Gardas, B. B. (2017). Understanding and predicting the determinants of cloud computing adoption: A two staged hybrid SEM - Neural networks approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.027en_US
dc.relation.referencesRaut, R. D., Priyadarshinee, P., Gardas, B. B., & Jha, M. K. (2018). Analyzing the factors influencing cloud computing adoption using three stage hybrid SEM-ANN-ISM (SEANIS) approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 134(July), 98–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.020en_US
dc.relation.referencesRevelo Sánchez, O., Collazos Ordoñez, C. A., & Jiménez Toledo, J. A. (2018). La gamificación como estrategia didáctica para la enseñanza/aprendizaje de la programación: un mapeo sistemático de literatura. Lámpsakos, 1(19), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.21501/21454086.2347en_US
dc.relation.referencesRico-Bautista, D., Maestre-Góngora, G. P., & Guerrero, C. D. (2020). Caracterización de la situación actual de las tecnologías inteligentes para una Universidad inteligente en Colombia/Latinoamérica. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, (E27), 484–501en_US
dc.relation.referencesRico-Bautista, D., Medina-Cárdenas, Y., Coronel-Rojas, L. A., Cuesta-Quintero, F., Barrientos-Avendaño, E., León, R. A. G., Maestre-Góngora, G. P., BarrientosAvendaño, E., & García-León, R. A. (2020). Smart university: Strategic map since the adoption of technology. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, (E28), 711–724. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2- s2.0-85080987823&partnerID=40&md5=aa8ca7c9cfbe217b2e40bb3b16df4f85en_US
dc.relation.referencesRico-Bautista, D., Medina-Cárdenas, Y., & Guerrero, C. D. (2019). Smart University: A Review from the Educational and Technological View of Internet of Things. In International Conference on Information Technology and Systems, ICITS 2019 (Vol. 918, pp. 427–440). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 11890-7_42en_US
dc.relation.referencesRico-Bautista, D. W. (2019). Conceptual framework for smart university. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1409(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1409/1/012009en_US
dc.relation.referencesRjab, A. Ben, & Mellouli, S. (2018). Smart cities in the era of artificial intelligence and internet of things. 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209380en_US
dc.relation.referencesSabi, H. M., Uzoka, F. E., Langmia, K., & Njeh, F. N. (2016). Conceptualizing a model for adoption of cloud computing in education. International Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.010en_US
dc.relation.referencesSánchez-Torres, B., Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. A., Rico-Bautista, D. W., & Guerrero, C. D. (2018). Smart Campus: Trends in cybersecurity and future development. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 27(47), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v27. n47.2018.7807en_US
dc.relation.referencesSargent, K., Hyland, P., & Sawang, S. (2012). Factors influencing the adoption of information technology in a construction business. Construction Economics and Building, 12(2), 86. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v12i2.2448en_US
dc.relation.referencesShaikh, H., Khan, M. S., Mahar, Z. A., Anwar, M., Raza, A., & Shah, A. (2019). A Conceptual Framework for Determining Acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) in Higher Education Institutions of Pakistan. 2019 International Conference on Information Science and Communication Technology (ICISCT), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISCT.2019.8777431en_US
dc.relation.referencesShaoyong, C., Yirong, T., & Zhefu, L. (2016). UNITA : A Reference Model of University IT Architecture. ICCIS ’16: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Communication and Information Systems, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3023924.3023949en_US
dc.relation.referencesShorfuzzaman, M., Hossain, M. S., Nazir, A., Muhammad, G., & Alamri, A. (2019). Harnessing the power of big data analytics in the cloud to support learning analytics in mobile learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 578–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.002en_US
dc.relation.referencesSigg, M. de L., Cisneros, J. L. V., Reyes, S. V., & Salcedo, J. A. R. (2014). Explicación de la Adopción de Tecnologías de Información en Pequeñas Empresas Usando el Modelo del Usuario Perezoso: un Caso de Estudio. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, e1, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.4304/risti.e1.91-104en_US
dc.relation.referencesSivathanu, B. (2018). Adoption of internet of things (IOT) based wearables for healthcare of older adults – a behavioural reasoning theory (BRT) approach. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 12(4), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET12-2017-0048en_US
dc.relation.referencesSurbakti, F. P. S., Wang, W., Indulska, M., & Sadiq, S. (2020). Factors influencing effective use of big data: A research framework. Information & Management, 57(1), 103146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.02.001en_US
dc.relation.referencesVasudavan, H., Shanmugam, K., & Ahmada, H. A. (2018). User Perceptions in Adopting Cloud Computing in Autonomous Vehicle. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technology: IoT and Smart City - ICIT 2018, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301551.3301583en_US
dc.relation.referencesVenkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Universidad inteligente Factores ...
Size:
647.1Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Thumbnail
Name:
Universidad inteligente Factores ...
Size:
647.1Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record