Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Polinomial chaos expansion applied to limit state functions
| dc.contributor.author | Afanador García, Nelson | |
| dc.contributor.author | Guerrero Gómez, Gustavo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nolasco Serna, Christian | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Colombia | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-15T20:22:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-15T20:22:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-01-20 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1742-6596 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5753 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In structural projects, ensuring system performance within the established specifications with a maximum level of safety and taking into account the economic constraints of the project is one of the main objectives of structural design. The risks to which any physical system is subjected are called failure probability and are assessed by applying structural reliability analysis methods. The objective of the structural reliability analysis is to ensure that the strength of the elements of the structure is greater than the imposed strength demand over the service life of each of the structural elements. Structural design variables are physical quantities in structural reliability and are considered random, and can be represented in a random vector. The failure probability of a structure is obtained from the evaluation of the uncertainties inherent to the physical variables of the project, through the probability distributions of the random variables. The objective of this work was the application of polynomial chaos expansion to evaluate the failure probability in limit state functions found in the literature using numerical simulation, in order to decrease the sample size for each random variable compared to those needed using Monte Carlo simulation. This research showed that the difference between the sample size between polynomial chaos expansion and Monte Carlo simulation is 5%, saving time and computational effort | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.relation | https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1742-6596 | en_US |
| dc.title | Polinomial chaos expansion applied to limit state functions | en_US |
| dc.title.translated | Polinomial chaos expansion applied to limit state functions | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | [0000016699] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | [8Uk1lqUAAAAJ&hl] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | [hLiV3CgAAAAJ&hl] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | [DriRZs4AAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | [0000-0001-6923-3388] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | [Christian-Serna] | en_US |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | In structural projects, ensuring system performance within the established specifications with a maximum level of safety and taking into account the economic constraints of the project is one of the main objectives of structural design. The risks to which any physical system is subjected are called failure probability and are assessed by applying structural reliability analysis methods. The objective of the structural reliability analysis is to ensure that the strength of the elements of the structure is greater than the imposed strength demand over the service life of each of the structural elements. Structural design variables are physical quantities in structural reliability and are considered random, and can be represented in a random vector. The failure probability of a structure is obtained from the evaluation of the uncertainties inherent to the physical variables of the project, through the probability distributions of the random variables. The objective of this work was the application of polynomial chaos expansion to evaluate the failure probability in limit state functions found in the literature using numerical simulation, in order to decrease the sample size for each random variable compared to those needed using Monte Carlo simulation. This research showed that the difference between the sample size between polynomial chaos expansion and Monte Carlo simulation is 5%, saving time and computational effort | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Polinomial,functions,application,transformation | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | Polinomial,functions,application,transformation | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad educación artes y humanidades | en_US |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Freudenthal A N 1956 Safety and the probability of structural failure Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 121(1) 1337–1397 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Mayer M 1926 Die Betriebseinrichtungen in Betriebswissenschaft (Berlin: Springer) pp 103-112 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Rzhanitzyn R 1957 It is necessary to improve the standards of design of building structures A Statistical Method of Design of Building Structures (Canada: National Research Council of Canada) pp 67-81 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Basler B 1961 Untersuchungen ¨uber den sicherheitsbegriff von bauwerken Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 27(4) 133–160 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Cornell C A 1971 First-order Uncertainty Analysis of Soil Deformation and Stability (Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press) pp 129–144 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Hasofer A M, Lind N C 1974 Exact and invariant second moment code format J. Engrg. Mech. 100(1) 111–121 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Rackwitz R, Fiessler B 1978 Structural reliability under combined load sequences Comput. Struct. 9(1) 489–494 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Hohenbichler M, Rackwitz R 1985 Non-normal dependent vectors in structural safety J. Engineering Mechanics Div. 107(6) 1227–1238 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ditlevsen O 1981 Principle of normal tail approximation J. Engineering Mechanics Div. 107(6) 1191–1 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Davies R B 1973 Numerical inversion of a characteristic function Biometrika 60 415–417 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Breitung K 1984 Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals J. Engrg. Mech. 100(3) 357–366 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Tvedt L 1990 Distribution of quadratic forms in normal space Journal of Engineering Mechanics 116(6) 1183–1197 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Field C 1996 Tail areas of linear combinations of chi-squares and non-central chi-squares J. of Statistical Computation and Simulation 15 243–248 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Melchers R E, Beck A T 2018 Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction (Hoboken: John wiley & sons) pp 1-506 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Afanador G N, Noriega S C 2020 Quantification of uncertainty in steel plates subject to fatigue with variable load via chaos expansion polynomial Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1708(1) 012032:1-7 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Choi S K, Grandhi R V, Canfield R A 2007 Reliability-based Structural Design (England: London) pp 1-306 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Evangelista F, Afanador-Garc´ıa N 2016 A polynomial chaos expansion approach to the analysis of uncertainty in viscoelastic structural elements DYNA 83(199) 172-182 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Afanador N, Noriega Sanchez C J, Nolasco Serna C 2020 Evaluation of uncertainty in determining the physical properties of concrete using Bootstrap Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1645(1) 0 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bird G A 1981 Monte-Carlo simulation in an engineering context Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics 74 239-255 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Blatman G, Sudret B 2011 Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression Journal of Computational Physics 230(6) 2345-2367 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Afanador N, Sanjuan Y, Medina D 2012 Dise˜no s´ısmico de muros de contenci´on en gravedad y voladizo Revista Colombiana de Tecnologias de Avanzada (RCTA) 2(20) 97-104 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Kewlani G, Crawford J, Iagnemma K 2012 A polynomial chaos approach to the analysis of vehicle dynamics under uncertainty Vehicle System Dynamics 50(5) 749-774 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Grooteman F 2008 Adaptive radial-based importance sampling method for structural reliability Structural Safety 30(1) 533-542 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Santosh T, Saraf R, Ghosh A, Kushwaka H 2006 Optimum step length selection rule in modified hl-rf method for structural reliability International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 83(1) 742-748 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Haldar A, Mahadevam S 2000 Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis (New York: John wiley & sons) pp 1-312 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.DOI | 10.1088 | en_US |
Ficheros en el ítem
Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)
-
Artículos [28]



