Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRamos Cuello, Deimer de Jesús
dc.contributor.authorRosado Gómez, Alveiro Alonso
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T21:11:33Z
dc.date.available2025-10-09T21:11:33Z
dc.date.issued2024-07-19
dc.identifier.issn1692-7257en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5707
dc.description.abstractEl artículo explora el uso de Word2Vec y FastText para convertir nombres de ocupaciones en representaciones vectoriales y analizar su polaridad de género. Se emplearon dos bases de datos colombianas para preparar y limpiar los datos. Mediante clasificadores, se evaluó cómo la polaridad de género afecta la clasificación de ocupaciones y salarios. Se utilizó ANOVA y pruebas de Tukey para el análisis estadístico. Se descubrió que modelos como ExtraTreesClassifier y XGBClassifier presentaron menores diferencias de precisión entre géneros, sugiriendo que tienden a clasificar con mayor exactitud a los hombres. Sin embargo, no se evidenció una preferencia clara en las predicciones de los modelos hacia un género específico tras manipular las variables relacionadas con denominaciones profesionales. El estudio destaca la importancia de abordar los sesgos sistémicos en representaciones semánticas que pueden perpetuar prejuicios existentes.en_US
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.relationhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9662615en_US
dc.titleExploración del sesgo de género en la clasificación de ocupaciones de Colombia utilizando aprendizaje automáticoen_US
dc.title.translatedExploring gender bias in Colombian occupation classification using machine learningen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacDeimer de Jesús Ramos Cuello [0000074783]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacAlveiro Alonso Rosado Gómez [0001350760]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarAlveiro Alonso Rosado Gómez [hLiV3CgAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidDeimer de Jesús Ramos Cuello [0009-0005-1108-0549]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidAlveiro Alonso Rosado Gómez [0000-0003-2932-3383]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateAlveiro Alonso Rosado Gómez [Alveiro-Rosado-Gomez]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusAlveiro Alonso Rosado Gómez [57205121079]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishThe paper explores using Word2Vec and FastText to convert occupational names into vector representations and analyze their gender polarity. Two Colombian databases were used to prepare and clean the data. Using classifiers, we evaluated how gender polarity affects the classification of occupations and salaries. ANOVA and Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis. It was discovered that models such as ExtraTreesClassifier and XGBClassifier presented more minor differences in accuracy between genders, suggesting that they tend to classify men more accurately. However, no clear preference was evident in the models' predictions toward a specific gender after manipulating the variables related to professional denominations. The study highlights the importance of addressing systemic biases in semantic representations that can perpetuate existing prejudices.en_US
dc.subject.proposalaprendizaje automáticoen_US
dc.subject.proposalaprendizaje supervisadoen_US
dc.subject.proposalequidad en inteligencia artificialen_US
dc.subject.proposalincrustaciones de palabrasen_US
dc.subject.proposalprocesamiento del lenguaje naturalen_US
dc.subject.keywordsMachine learningen_US
dc.subject.keywordssupervised learningen_US
dc.subject.keywordsequity in artificial intelligenceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsword embeddingsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsnatural language processingen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesN. Bantilan, «Themis-ml: A Fairness-Aware Machine Learning Interface for End-To-End Discrimination Discovery and Mitigation,» Journal of Technology in Human Services, pp. 15-30, 2018.en_US
dc.relation.referencesJ. Borana, «Applications of Artificial Intelligence & Associated Technologies,» de International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Engineering, Biomedical, Management and Science, Jodhpur, 2016.en_US
dc.relation.referencesR. Burke, «Multisided Fairness for Recommendation,» de Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning, Halifax, 2017.en_US
dc.relation.referencesN. Mehrabi, F. Morstatter, N. Saxena, K. Lerman y A. Galstyan, «A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning,» arXiv, pp. 1- 31, 2019.en_US
dc.relation.referencesS. Chowdhury y A. Nath, «Trends In Natural Language Processing : Scope And Challenges,» International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 2021.en_US
dc.relation.referencesB. Dev, A. Singh, N. Uppal, A. Rizwan, V. Sri y S. Suman, «Survey Paper: Study of Natural Language Processing and its Recent Applications,» International Conference on Innovative Sustainable Computational Technologies (CISCT), pp. 1-5, 2022.en_US
dc.relation.referencesA. Nohria y H. Kaur, «Evaluation of Parsing Techniques in Natural Language Processing,» International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 2018.en_US
dc.relation.referencesA. Gerek, M. C. Yüney, E. Erkaya y M. C. Ganiz, «Effects of Positivization on the Paragraph Vector Model,» IEEE International Symposium on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA), pp. 1-5, 2019.en_US
dc.relation.referencesN. Swinger, M. De-Arteaga, N. T. Heffernan IV, M. Leiserson y A. T. Kalai, «What Are the Biases in My Word Embedding?,» de Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Honolulu, 2019.en_US
dc.relation.referencesT. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. Corrado y J. Dean, «Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality,» arXiv, pp. 1-9, 2013.en_US
dc.relation.referencesP. Bojanowski, E. Grave, A. Joulin y T. Mikolov, «Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information,» arXiv, 2016.en_US
dc.relation.referencesT. Bolukbasi, K.-W. Chang, J. Zou, V. Saligrama y A. Kalai, «Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings,» arXiv, 2016.en_US
dc.relation.referencesA. Géron, Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow, Sebastopol: O’Reilly, 2019.en_US
dc.relation.referencesC. Lopez, A. Gazgalis, V. Boddapati, R. Shah, J. Cooper y J. Geller, «Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review,» Arthroplasty Today, pp. 103-112, 2021.en_US
dc.relation.referencesA. Caliskan, P. P. Ajay, T. Charlesworth, R. Wolfe y M. Banaji, «Gender Bias in Word Embeddings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Frequency, Syntax, and Semantics,» arXiv, pp. 1-15, 2022.en_US
dc.relation.referencesY. Shrestha y Y. Yang, «Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Applications in Multi-Winner Voting, Machine Learning, and Recommender Systems,» Algorithms, vol. 12, pp. 1-28, 2019.en_US
dc.relation.referencesH. Chung, C. Park, W. S. Kang y J. Lee, «Gender Bias in Artificial Intelligence: Severity Prediction at an Early Stage of COVID-19,» Front Physio, 2021.en_US
dc.relation.referencesU. Mahadeo y R. Dhanalakshmi, «Stability of feature selection algorithm: A review,» Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, p. 1060 –1073, 2022.en_US
dc.relation.referencesP. S. Varsha, «How can we manage biases in artificial intelligence systems – A systematic literature review,» International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, pp. 1-9, 2023.en_US
dc.relation.referencesA. Bhattacharya, Applied Machine Learning Explainability Techniques: Make ML models explainable and trustworthy for practical applications using LIME, SHAP, and more, Birmingham: Packt, 2022.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record