Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Balanced Scorecard: estrategia para la medición del desempeño en la dirección de proyectos

dc.contributor.authorCastro Silva, Hugo Fernando
dc.contributor.authorMontes Guerra, Maricela Isabel
dc.contributor.authorDíez Silva, Henry Mauricio
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-08T15:07:02Z
dc.date.available2025-10-08T15:07:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-01
dc.identifier.issn1315-9984en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5687
dc.description.abstractEste trabajo de busca analizar el impacto de la utilización del Balanced Scorecard como herramienta estratégica de apoyo en la gestión de proyectos, para el sector de Tecnología de Información en Colombia. El estudio de carácter exploratorio indaga sobre la integración de Balanced Scorecard con las actividades propias de la gestión de proyectos, se desarrolló un trabajo de campo con 105 gerentes de proyectos en el sector de estudio, comparando proyectos desarrollados con diferentes metodologías de seguimiento y control, contra proyectos que han implementado el Balance Scorecard. Los resultados permiten establecer que el Balanced Scorecard es una herramienta que puede mejorar la eficacia y eficiencia de la gestión de los proyectos en términos de alineación de los resultados del proyecto con la estrategia de la organización. Este estudio permite concluir que el Balanced Scorecard permite establecer y hacer medidas estratégicas y conexiones más claras entre el proyecto y la estrategia organizacional, que pueden ocasionar un mejor desempeño interno del equipo del proyecto en términos de entrega oportuna, cumplimiento de presupuesto, gestión de la calidad, alcance y riesgos del proyecto.en_US
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.relationhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8890560en_US
dc.titleBalanced Scorecard: estrategia para la medición del desempeño en la dirección de proyectosen_US
dc.title.translatedBalanced Scorecard: strategy for measuring performance in project managementen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacHugo Fernando Castro Silva [0001388686]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacMaricela Isabel Montes Guerra [0001377210]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacHenry Mauricio Díez Silva [0000955019]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarHugo Fernando Castro Silva [vxtjgAoAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarMaricela Isabel Montes Guerra [6Iwx6SEAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarHenry Mauricio Díez Silva [boi7FbcAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidHugo Fernando Castro Silva [0000-0001-6020-402X]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidMaricela Isabel Montes Guerra [0000-0002-6569-6219]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidHenry Mauricio Díez Silva [0000-0003-1434-9329]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateHugo Fernando Castro Silva [Hugo-Castro-Silva]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateMaricela Isabel Montes Guerra [Maricela-Montes-Guerra]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateHenry Mauricio Díez Silva [Henry-Diez-Silva]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusHugo Fernando Castro Silva [57205121211]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusMaricela Isabel Montes Guerra [56565429000]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishThis research analyzes the impact of the use of the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic support tool in project management for the Information Technology sector in Colombia. The exploratory study investigates the integration of Balanced Scorecaed with the activities of project management, a field research was carried with 105 project managers in the sector the study, comparing projects developed with different monitoring and control methodologies, against projects have implemented the Balance Scorecard. The results show empirical evidence that allows establishing that the Balanced Scorecard is a tool that can improve the effectiveness and efficiency of project management, specifically in terms of aligning project results with the organization’s strategy. This study allows concluding that the Balanced Scorecard allows establishing and making strategic measures and clearer connections between the project and the organizational strategy, which can lead to a better internal performance of the project team in terms of timely delivery, budget compliance, quality management, scope and risks.en_US
dc.subject.proposalBalanced Scorecarden_US
dc.subject.proposaldirección de proyectosen_US
dc.subject.proposalmedición del desempeñoen_US
dc.subject.proposalsector tecnología de informaciónen_US
dc.subject.keywordsBalanced Scorecarden_US
dc.subject.keywordsproject managementen_US
dc.subject.keywordsperformance measurementen_US
dc.subject.keywordsinformation technology sectoren_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesAlcaraz, A. S., Alvarado-Peña, L., Osuna, L. V., & Lizárraga, F. S. (2020). Indicadores en el servicio en las pequeñas y medianas empresas restauranteras en México: un abordaje comparativo. Telos: Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios En Ciencias Sociales, 22(3), 551– 566. https://doi.org/10.36390/ TELOS223.06en_US
dc.relation.referencesAliakbari, N. F., Shafiei, N. M., & Olfat, L. (2019). Developing the framework of sustainable service supply chain balanced scorecard (SSSC BSC). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(1), 148-170. https://www.emerald. com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ IJPPM-04-2018-0149/full/htmlen_US
dc.relation.referencesAsosheh, A., Nalchigar, S., Jamporazmey, M. (2010). Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5931-5938.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAnderson, D. K. & Merna, T. (2003). Project management strategy – project management represented as a process based set of management domains and the consequences for project management strategy. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 387–93.en_US
dc.relation.referencesArtto, K. & Wikstrom, K. (2005). What is project business? International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), 343–53. https://www.journals. elsevier.com/international-journal-ofproject-managementen_US
dc.relation.referencesArtto, K., Kujala, J., Dietrich, P., & Martinsuo, M. (2008). What is project strategy?. International Journal of Project Management, 26 (1), 4–12.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAwwal, M. I. (2014). Importance of Strategic Aspect in Project Management: A Literature Critique. International Journal Supply Chain Management, 3(4), 96-99.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBaccarini, D. (1999). The logical framework method for defining project success. Project Management Journal, 30(4), 25-32.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBriner, W., Hastings, C., & Geddes, M. (1996). Project leadership. Aldershot, UK: Gower.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCastellano, N., & Díaz, B. (2021). Tecnologías de información y comunicación en la sociedad del conocimiento. Negotium Revista Científica Electrónica de Ciencias Gerenciales, 47(16). https://doi. org/10.5281/ZENODO.4765991en_US
dc.relation.referencesCleland, D. I. (1999). Project management: Strategic design and implementation. McGraw-Hill Education— Europe.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCochran, W. G. (1986). Técnicas de muestreo. Companía Editorial Continental. Méxicoen_US
dc.relation.referencesDietrich, P., & Lehtonen, P. (2005). Successful management of strategic intentions through multiple projects – reflections from empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 23(5), 386–391.en_US
dc.relation.referencesFlagstad, E. (2013). The use of the balanced scorecard in project management. (Order No. 1538596, The College of St. Scholastica). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 68.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGlegg, S. M., Ryce, A., & Brownlee, K. (2019). A visual management tool for program planning, project management and evaluation in paediatric health care. Evaluation and program planning, 72, 16- 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. evalprogplan.2018.09.005en_US
dc.relation.referencesGlegg, S. M., Ryce, A., & Brownlee, K. (2019). A visual management tool for program planning, project management and evaluation in paediatric health care. Evaluation and program planning, 72, 16- 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. evalprogplan.2018.09.005en_US
dc.relation.referencesEilat, H., Golany, B., & Shtub, A. (2008), R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach. Omega, 36(5), 895-912.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2003). Metodología de la investigación. México: Mc Graw Hill.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHersey, P., Blanchard, K., & Johnson, D. E. (1996). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. London: Prentice Hall International.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review (January–February).en_US
dc.relation.referencesKaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic measurement system. Harvard Business Review (January– February).en_US
dc.relation.referencesKeyhanifar, N., Malakhlifeh, M. R., & Shahraki, A. (2012). Evaluating IT performance using combined model of balanced scorecard & fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 1267-1277. https:// journal-archieves14.webs.com/1267- 1277.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesLesáková, Ľ., & Dubcová, K. (2016). Knowledge and use of the balanced scorecard method in the businesses in the Slovak Republic. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 39-48.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLongma, A., & Mullins, J. (2004). Project management: key tool for implementing Strategy. Journal of Business Strategy, 25(5), 54-60.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMelendez, J. R., Pérez, I., Garcia, R., & Piñero, P. (2018). Strategic factors in the context of project management: Management perspectives. Revista Espacios, 39(39). http://www.revistaespacios. com/a18v39n39/18393910.htmlen_US
dc.relation.referencesMintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. New York: The Free Press.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMontero, J. M., Guevara Gómez, H. E., Flores Arocutipa, J. P., y Ledesma Cuadros, M. (2020). Áreas de conocimiento y fases clave en la gestión de proyectos: consideraciones. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 25(90), 680-692. https:// doi.org/10.37960/rvg.v25i90.32409en_US
dc.relation.referencesNiebecker, K., Eager, D., & Moulton, B. (2010). Collaborative and crosscompany project management within the automotive industry using the balanced scorecard. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(2), 328-337.en_US
dc.relation.referencesNorrie, J., & Walker, D. H. (2004). A balanced scorecard approach to project Management leadership. Project Management Journal, 35(4), 47-56.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPérez-Calle, R. D., García-Casarejos, N., & García-Bernal, J. (2021). La empresa española ante la COVID-19: factores de adaptación al nuevo escenario. Retos, 11(21), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.17163/RET. N21.2021.01en_US
dc.relation.referencesPinto, J. (2013). Project management: achieving competitive advantage Pearson.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPMI - Project Management Institute (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Pennsylvania: PMI.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRad, P., & Levin, G. (2003). Achieving Project Management Success Using Virtual Teams. Boca Raton, FL.: J. Ross Publishing.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSrivannaboon, S., & Milosevic D. Z. (2006). A Theortical Framework for Aligning Project Management with Business Strutegy. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 98.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSrivannaboon, S. (2009). Linking project management with business strategy. Rochester: Social Science Research Network.en_US
dc.relation.referencesStewart, W. E. (2001). Balanced scorecard for projects. Project Management Journal, 32(1), 38-53.en_US
dc.relation.referencesStewart, R. A., & Mohamed, S. (2001). Utilizing the balanced scorecard for IT/IS performance evaluation in construction. Construction Innovation, 1(3), 147-163.en_US
dc.relation.referencesVillasmil, M. del C., Romero, F. J., & Socorro, C. C. (2021). Liderazgo ético en la gestión pública municipal del estado Zulia, Venezuela. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 27(2), 199- 216. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs. v27i2.35907en_US
dc.relation.referencesYüksel, I., & Dagdeviren, M. (2010). Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1270-1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eswa.2009.06.002en_US
dc.identifier.DOI10.52080/rvgluz.26.96.17en_US


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Balanced Scorecard estrategia ...
Tamaño:
2.182Mb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem