Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGarcía Quintero, Carmen Liceth
dc.contributor.authorDurán Chinchilla, Claudia Marcela
dc.contributor.authorCasadiegos Santana, Martín Humberto
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-06T22:06:03Z
dc.date.available2025-10-06T22:06:03Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-17
dc.identifier.issn2216-0388en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5675
dc.description.abstractEl mundo va cambiando y con él, el pensamiento y su actuación; a la par, los adelantos científicos y tecnológicos que el mundo contemporáneo y globalizante imponen, los cuales han generado nuevos paradigmas éticos, especialmente en la forma de concebir la ética y a quiénes aplica. De tal manera, se hace importante realizar una exploración a cerca de la bioética animal, toda vez que para nadie es oculto que los animales, en muchas ocasiones, son usados en experimentación, en ejercicios prácticos de laboratorio, en granjas y en hogares son adoptados, pero no se les ofrece una calidad de vida apropiada para su bienestar. En este estudio se dará razón a la normatividad que ampara y defiende el cuidado y bienestar de los animales en cualquier espacio o habitad, en especial en aquellos escenarios en los que los animales sufren por el maltrato. Para ello se hace una revisión documental de conceptos, normatividad y leyes que favorecen al animal.en_US
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.relationhttps://www.fesc.edu.co/Revistas/OJS/index.php/mundofesc/article/view/1468en_US
dc.titleÉtica, Bioética y Bienestar animal:Un Marco normativo y Conceptualen_US
dc.title.translatedEthics, Bioethics and Animal Welfare: A Normative and Conceptual Frameworken_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0001380164]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0001592276]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[XszWRgQAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[AU0O_zAAAAAJ&hl]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[oAAAAJ&hl]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0001-9291-7841]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0001-9112-1585]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[Claudia-Chinchilla]en_US
dc.contributor.scopus[57369586400]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishThe world is changing and with it, thought and action; at the same time, the scientific and technological advances that the contemporary and globalising world imposes, which have generated new ethical paradigms, especially in the way of conceiving ethics and to whom it applies. Thus, it is important to explore animal bioethics, since it is no secret that animals are often used in experimentation, in practical laboratory exercises, on farms and in homes they are adopted, but they are not offered a quality of life appropriate to their welfare. In this study, the regulations that protect and defend the care and welfare of animals in any space or habitat will be explained, especially in those scenarios in which animals suffer from mistreatment. To this end, a documentary review of concepts, regulations and laws that favour animals is carried out.en_US
dc.subject.proposalMaltrato animal, derecho animal, bienestar animal, ética y bioéticaen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal abuse, animal rights, animal welfare, ethics, and bioethicsen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad educación artes y humanidadesen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesG. Santibañez, J. Dominichetti, M. Sanhueza, "El conocimiento animal", Revista de Psicología, vol. XII, núm. 2, 35-52, 2003en_US
dc.relation.referencesC. Warden, T. Jenkins, L. Warner, Comparative Psychology. New York.: Le Ronald Press Company, 1940en_US
dc.relation.referencesF. Waal, Chimpanzee politics. Londres : John Hopkins University Press.1990en_US
dc.relation.referencesF. Ascione, Children and animals: Exploring the roots of kindness and cruelty. Purder University Press, 2005.en_US
dc.relation.referencesG. Francione, Animal rights: The abolitionist approach. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2015.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRSPCA, The use of animals in blood sports, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www. rspca.org.uk/adviceandwelfare/hunting/investigations/bloodsports.en_US
dc.relation.referencesB. Rollin, "The ethical of animals in biomedical research", Ethics & Behavior, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 69-81, 2019en_US
dc.relation.referencesF. Ascione , K. Shaipro, "People and animals, kindness and cruelty: research directions and policy implications", Journal of Social Issues, no. 65, pp. 569-587, 2009en_US
dc.relation.referencesC. Hensley, "The animal–human connection: A multidimensional analysis of the relationship between animal cruelty and interpersonal violence", Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 33, no. 17, pp. 2694-2726, 2018en_US
dc.relation.referencesE. Boakes, "Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data", PLoS Biology, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 300-303, 2020en_US
dc.relation.referencesAnimal Legal Defense Fund, Our history, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://aldf.org/ about-us/our-history/en_US
dc.relation.referencesH. Herzog, Some we love, some we hate, some we eat: why it's so hard to think straight about animals. Harper, 2018en_US
dc.relation.referencesR. Harrison, Animal Machines. London: the new factory farming industry. Forword by Rachel Carsson, 1964en_US
dc.relation.referencesS.Waisman, B.Wagman, P. Frashc, "The Law: Cases and Materials”, Estados Unidos : Carolina Academic Press. 2014en_US
dc.relation.referencesOIE, Código Sanitario. Organización Mundial de la Sanidad Animal, 2014. [En línea]. Disponible en https://www.oie.int/es/inicio/en_US
dc.relation.referencesWelfare, Animal Welfare, Estados Unidos de América, 2013en_US
dc.relation.referencesJ. Wapnex, Legislative and regulatory options for animal welfare, Roma: Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011en_US
dc.relation.referencesN. Taylor, T. Signal, "Pet dogs and older people: the role of personal possessions", Angeing &Society, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 899-918, 2008en_US
dc.relation.referencesT. Regan, The case for animal rights. California: University of California Press, 1983en_US
dc.relation.referencesA. Birch, Animal welfare legislation and farm animal welfare. In farm animals welfare. Springer, 1-28, 2017en_US
dc.relation.referencesEuropean Commision, A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:// ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesM. Bekoff, J. Pierce, Wild justice: the moral lives of animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012en_US
dc.relation.referencesC. Reeve, R. Rogerson, "Factors affecting the implementation of animal welfare standars on British dairy farm", Land Use Policy, no° 61, pp. 45-56, 2017en_US
dc.relation.referencesD. Broom, "Indicators of poor wekfare", Br Vet J, pp. 524-526, 1986en_US
dc.relation.referencesJ. Riechmann, Todos los animales somos hermanos. Madrid: Catarata, 2005en_US
dc.relation.referencesRAE, Diccionario de la lengua Española. Madrid: Espasa, 2021.en_US
dc.relation.referencesA. Martin, Modernidad, humanos y animales. En Reflexiones en torno al concepto de Holocaustro 31-57. Madrid: Catarata, 2008en_US
dc.relation.referencesV. Potter, Bioethics bridge to the future. New York : Prebtis Hal, 1971en_US
dc.relation.referencesB. Rollin, Farm animal welfare: Social, bioethical and research issues. Wiley Blackwell, 2017en_US
dc.relation.referencesF. Donoso, Bioética frente a los derechos animales: tensión en las fornteras de la filosofia moral. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona, 2014en_US
dc.relation.referencesJ. Arana, "¿La conciencia constituye factor diferencial de lo humano a lo meramente animal? Naturaleza y Libertad",. Revista de Estudios Interdiciplinares, pp. 33- 54, 2018en_US
dc.relation.referencesR. Posner, "Utilitarismo, economía y teroría del derecho, Estudios Politicos, vol. 69, 1998en_US
dc.relation.referencesN. Brieskorn, Curso Fundamental de Filosofia. Herber, 2016en_US
dc.relation.referencesP. Singer, Liberaciòn Animal: El clÁsico definitivo del movieminto animalista. Taurus, 2018en_US
dc.relation.referencesM. Suarez, M. Del sol, M. Rojas, "La relevancia del dolor de los animales de experimentación y de producción", Int J. Morphol, pp. 1383-1390, 2021en_US
dc.relation.referencesV. Padilla, Los animales al derecho. Nuevas concepciones juridicas sobre los animales en America Latina: de la Cosa al ser sintiente. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes, 2018en_US
dc.relation.referencesJ. Birchall, "The development of animals welfare law and its influence on research animal ethics", ILARS journal, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 151-160, 2019en_US
dc.relation.referencesW. Rusell, R. Burch, The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Methuen & Co.Ltd.1959en_US
dc.relation.referencesSentencia C-048/, Expediente D-11476 (Corte Constitucional de Colombia 02 de Febrero de 2017)en_US
dc.relation.referencesCITES, 2022. [Online]. Avalilable: www.cites.org: https://cites.org/esp/disc/text.php.en_US
dc.relation.referencesM. Mateos, Bienestar animal, sufrimiento y consciencia. México: Universidad de Extremadura, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2003en_US
dc.relation.referencesH. Rojas, "Políticas y prácticas de bienestar animal en los países de América: estudio preliminar", Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 549-565, 2005en_US
dc.relation.referencesL. Buitrago, Lineamientos para la política de tenencia responsable de animales de compañía y de producción, MinSalud, 2017en_US
dc.relation.referencesC. López, Los animales desde el derecho: conceptos y casos en Colombia. Bogotá: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 2020en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps:// doi.org/10.61799/2216-0388.1468en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record