Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

HÁBITOS LABORALES QUE INFLUYEN EN LA PRODUCTIVIDAD LABORAL

dc.contributor.authorCárdenas García,  Maribel
dc.contributor.authorCañizares Arévalo, Jorge de Jesús
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez Mendoza, Julio Alfonso
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-05T15:37:59Z
dc.date.available2025-05-05T15:37:59Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2312-3605en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5263
dc.description.abstractLa productividad laboral es la relación entre los recursos utilizados para generar un producto o servicio y el valor del propio producto o servicio, por lo que constituye un elemento clave en la competitividad empresarial, siendo un tema que tanto académicos como empresarios buscan comprender mejor cada día. El objetivo de este trabajo es determinar los hábitos laborales que influyen en la productividad laboral en algunos sectores económicos públicos y gubernamentales de Norte de Santander (Colombia). Para ello, se utiliza la fenomenología como método y se toma como informantes clave a 25 directivos de pequeñas y medianas empresas. Los principales hallazgos indican que los hábitos que influyen positivamente en la productividad en los sectores estudiados son: actitud, actuar ético, creatividad, gestión del tiempo y trabajo en equipo; mientras que los hábitos con mayor influencia negativa son: falta de actitud, mala gestión del tiempo, relaciones interpersonales, pensamiento centrado en metas y desempeño ético. Estos hallazgos permiten a los líderes organizacionales ajustar sus estrategias de contratación y formación para potenciar los hábitos positivos y minimizar los efectos negativos en el desempeño laboral.en_US
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.relationhttps://www.russianlawjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/2621/1492en_US
dc.titleHÁBITOS LABORALES QUE INFLUYEN EN LA PRODUCTIVIDAD LABORALen_US
dc.title.translatedWORKPLACE HABITS THAT INFLUENCE LABOR PRODUCTIVITYen_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0001409068]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0001409065]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0001447166]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[vhQyeG0AAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[RJA3KNEAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[wKBoiiUAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0003-3404-88069]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0002-7838-4695]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0001-6329-3347]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[Maribel-Cardenas-Garcia-2105274070]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[Jorge-de-Jesus-Canizares-Arevalo-2105283286]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[Julio-Gonzalez-Mendoza]en_US
dc.contributor.scopus[57205116838]en_US
dc.contributor.scopus[58159806800]en_US
dc.contributor.scopus[57207031515]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishLabor productivity is the relationship between the resources used to generate a product or service and the value of the product or service itself, so it is a key element in business competitiveness and that both academics and businessmen are trying to understand better every day. The objective of this work is to determine the work habits that influence labor productivity in some public and governmental economic sectors of Norte de Santander (Colombia). For this purpose, phenomenology is used as a method and 25 executives of small and medium-sized companies are used as key informants. The main findings indicate that the habits that influence productivity in the sectors studied are: Attitude, Ethical acting, Creativity, Time management, Teamwork, while the habits with the greatest negative influence are: Lack of attitude, Poor time management, Interpersonal relationships, Goal-focused thinking, and Ethical performance. These findings allow organizational leaders to adjust their hiring and training strategies to enhance positive habits and minimize the negative effects on job performance.en_US
dc.subject.proposalProductividaden_US
dc.subject.keywordsproductivityen_US
dc.subject.lembWORKPLACE HABITS THAT INFLUENCE LABOR PRODUCTIVITYen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ciencias administrativas y económicasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesAbel, M. (2013). The Social And Financial Benefits Of Developing Employee Satisfaction. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 17(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.19030/IJMIS.V17I2.7711en_US
dc.relation.referencesBrown, S., McHardy, J., McNabb, R., & Taylor, K. (2011). Workplace performance, worker commitment, and loyalty. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 20(3), 925–955. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1530-9134.2011.00306.X;PAGEGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATIONen_US
dc.relation.referencesCequea, M., Rodríguez, C., & Núñez, M. (2011). The productivity from a human perspective: Dimensions and factors. Intangible Capital, 7(2), 549–584. https://doi.org/10.3926/IC.194en_US
dc.relation.referencesCharness, G., & Kuhn. P. (2007). Does pay inequality affect worker effort? Experimental evidence. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(4), 693–723. https://doi.org/10.1086/519540;SUBPAGE:STRING:ABSTRACT;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:JOLE;ISSUE:ISSUE:10.1086/523781;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATIONen_US
dc.relation.referencesCortina, A. (1994). Ética de la empresa : claves para una nueva cultura empresarial (3rd, ilustrada ed.). Editorial Trotta. https://books.google.com/books/about/Etica_de_la_empresa.html?hl=es&id=IUIQSgAACAAJen_US
dc.relation.referencesD’Angelo, O. (2002). El desarrollo profesional creador (DPC) como dimensión del proyecto de vida en el ámbito profesional. Revista Cubana de Psicología, 19(2), 106–114. https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/revista-cubana-de-psicologia/articulo/el-desarrollo-profesional-creador-dpc-como-dimension-del-proyecto-de-vida-en-el-ambito-profesionalen_US
dc.relation.referencesDever, M., & Morrison, Z. (2009). Women, research performance and work context. Tertiary Education and Management, 15(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583880802700107/METRICSen_US
dc.relation.referencesDoucouliagos, C. (1995). Worker Participation and Productivity in Labor-Managed and Participatory Capitalist Firms: A Meta-Analysis. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 49(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399504900104en_US
dc.relation.referencesFishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.en_US
dc.relation.referencesForde, C., Slater, G., & Spencer, D. (2006). Fearing the worst? Threat, participation and workplace productivity. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 27(3), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X06065961;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATIONen_US
dc.relation.referencesGarza, C., & Canett, J. (2005). Actitudes laborales en la educación técnica pública de Celaya. Enseñanza e Investigación En Psicología, 10(2), 271–280. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29210204en_US
dc.relation.referencesJensen, J., Patel, P., & Messersmith, J. (2013). High-Performance Work Systems and Job Control. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1699–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419663en_US
dc.relation.referencesKoning, J., & Gelderblom, A. (2006). ICT and older workers: No unwrinkled relationship. International Journal of Manpower, 27(5), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720610683967/FULL/XMLen_US
dc.relation.referencesLangfred, C. (2013). To be or not to be autonomous: Exploring why employees want more autonomy. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 355–366. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287939544_To_be_or_not_to_be_autonomous_Exploring_why_employees_want_more_autonomyen_US
dc.relation.referencesMas, A., & Moretti, E. (2009). Peers at Work. American Economic Review, 99(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.99.1.112en_US
dc.relation.referencesOluseyi, A., & Hammed, T. (2009). Influence of work motivation, leadership effectiveness and time management on employees’ performance in some selected industries in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 16, 7–17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279897635_Influence_of_work_motivation_leadership_effectiveness_and_time_management_on_employees’_performance_in_some_selected_industries_in_Ibadan_Oyo_State_Nigeriaen_US
dc.relation.referencesOskamp, S. (1984). Applied social psychology. Prentice-Hall. https://books.google.com/books/about/Applied_Social_Psychology.html?hl=es&id=tQS4AAAAIAAJen_US
dc.relation.referencesPapua J. (20002). Técnicas de investigación aplicada a las ciencias sociales. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. https://polidoc.usac.edu.gt/opac/record/19444?&mode=advanced&query=@field1=encabezamiento@value1= CIENCIAS SOCIALES&recnum=226en_US
dc.relation.referencesParra, F. (1998). El objeto olvidado de la sociología. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 56, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.1942en_US
dc.relation.referencesPlunkett, W., Allen, G., & Attner, R. (2013). Management : meeting and exceeding customer expectations. South-Western, Cengage Learning.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPosthuma, R., Campion, M., Masimova, M., & Campion, M. (2013). A High Performance Work Practices Taxonomy: Integrating the Literature and Directing Future Research. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1184–1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478184en_US
dc.relation.referencesRapert, M., & Wren, B. (1998). Reconsidering Organizational Structure: A Dual Perspective of Frameworks and Processes. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(3), 287–302. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40604200en_US
dc.relation.referencesRobbins, S., & Judge, T. (2009). COMPORTAMIENTO ORGANIZACIONAL. Pearson Educación.en_US
dc.relation.referencesStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Universidad de Antioquia. http://www.academia.edu/download/38537364/Teoria_Fundamentada.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesUddin, J., Luva, R., & Hossian, S. (2012). Impact of Organizational Culture on Employee Performance and Productivity: A Case Study of Telecommunication Sector in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.5539/IJBM.V8N2P63en_US
dc.relation.referencesVroom, V., & Deci, E. (1979). Motivación y alta dirección. In Biblioteca de ciencias de la administración. Editorial Trillas. https://books.google.com/books/about/Motivación_y_alta_dirección.html?hl=es&id=Bg8kKgAACAAJen_US
dc.relation.referencesWaal, A. (2012). Characteristics of High Performance Organisations. Journal of Management Research, 4(4), 39–71. https://doi.org/10.5296/JMR.V4I4.2062en_US


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
WORKPLACE HABITS THAT INFLUENCE ...
Tamaño:
2.289Mb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem