Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorHuertas Cardozo, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorRincón Ortega, Anggie Zuleidy
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-27T16:50:25Z
dc.date.available2025-10-27T16:50:25Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-15
dc.identifier.issn2405-8440en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5954
dc.description.abstractReducir el consumo energético en la operación de aeropuertos se ha identificado como uno de los enfoques para lograr los compromisos de los países en la reducción de sus emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero (GEI). El primer paso en este enfoque es el desarrollo de un diagnóstico energético. Sin embargo, múltiples aspectos prácticos permanecen sin resolver al aplicar las metodologías existentes para realizar diagnósticos energéticos, especialmente en el caso de aeropuertos de pequeña y mediana escala. Buscando abordar estas cuestiones, este trabajo presenta diagnósticos energéticos de dos aeropuertos internacionales mexicanos para que puedan ser utilizados para realizar diagnósticos energéticos en otros aeropuertos con características similares. Se da énfasis en identificar y priorizar, desde un punto de vista sustentable, las estrategias para reducir el consumo energético y las emisiones de GEI. El Aeropuerto de Ciudad del Carmen (CME) se encuentra en una región cercana a la costa con altas temperaturas ambientales (27 ◦C) y humedades. Se encontró que en 2019, el aeropuerto de CME consumió 123 MWh con un promedio de 577 Wh por pasajero, siendo el sistema HVAC el principal consumidor de energía. Las estrategias críticas para el aeropuerto de CME incluyen sistemas fotovoltaicos y la renovación de la climatización. En contraste, el aeropuerto de Puebla (PBC) se ubica en una región con condiciones ambientales confortables (16 °C). En 2019, el aeropuerto de PBC consumió 61.31 MWh/año y 442 Wh por pasajero. Las principales estrategias para PBC incluyen la expansión de su sistema de generación de energía fotovoltaica, programas de concientización para empleados y la renovación de la flota vehicular con vehículos eléctricos.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relationhttps://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)11268-6en_US
dc.titleEficiencia energética en aeropuertos de mediana escala: Dos aeropuertos mexicanos como caso de estudioen_US
dc.title.translatedEnergy efficiency in medium-scale airports: Two Mexican airports as case of studyen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacJosé Ignacio Huertas Cardozo [0000057398]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacAnggie Zuleidy Rincón Ortega [0000058705]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarJosé Ignacio Huertas Cardozo [ioC-7WsAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidJosé Ignacio Huertas Cardozo [0000-0003-4508-6453]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidAnggie Zuleidy Rincón Ortega [0000-0002-7096-939X]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateJosé Ignacio Huertas Cardozo [Jose-Huertas-3]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateAnggie Zuleidy Rincón Ortega [Anggie-Rincon]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusJosé Ignacio Huertas Cardozo [7103267573]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishReducing energy consumption in the operation of airports has been identified as one of the approaches to achieve the commitments of the countries in reducing their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The first step in this approach is the development of an energy diagnostic. However, multiple practical aspects remain unresolved when applying the existing methodologies to perform energy diagnostics, especially in the case of small and medium-scale airports. Seeking to address these issues, this work presents energy diagnostics of two Mexican international airports so that it can be used to carry out energy diagnostics in other airports with similar characteristics. Emphasis is given to identifying and prioritizing, from a sustainable point of view, the strategies to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions. The Ciudad del Carmen Airport (CME) is located in a nearshore region with high ambient temperatures (27 ◦C) and humidities. It was found that in 2019, the CME airport consumed 123 MWh with an average of 577 Wh per passenger, with the HVAC system being the primary energy consumer. Critical strategies for the CME airport include photovoltaic systems and HVAC renovation. In contrast, the Puebla airport (PBC) is located in a region with comfortable ambient conditions (16 ◦C). In 2019, the PBC airport consumed 61.31 MWh/year and 442 Wh per passenger. The main strategies for PBC include expanding its photovoltaic energy generation system, employee awareness programs, and renewing the vehicle fleet with electric vehicles.en_US
dc.subject.proposalDiagnóstico energéticoen_US
dc.subject.proposalAuditoría energéticaen_US
dc.subject.proposalEmisiones de GEIen_US
dc.subject.proposalObjetivos de desarrollo sostenibleen_US
dc.subject.proposalAcción por el climaen_US
dc.subject.proposalAeropuertoen_US
dc.subject.proposalZona terrestreen_US
dc.subject.keywordsEnergy diagnosticen_US
dc.subject.keywordsEnergy auditen_US
dc.subject.keywordsGHG emissionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSustainable development goalsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsClimate actionen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAirporten_US
dc.subject.keywordsLandsideen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesH. Bakır, et al., Forecasting of future greenhouse gas emission trajectory for India using energy and economic indexes with various metaheuristic algorithms, J. Clean. Prod. 360 (Aug. 2022) 131946, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131946.en_US
dc.relation.referencesATAG, "Air Transport Action Group, Facts & figures," https://www.atag.org/facts-figures.html.2020.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAir transport action group, Aviation: Benefits beyond Borders Report, 2020.en_US
dc.relation.referencesA. Kumar, A. A, H. Gupta, Evaluating green performance of the airports using hybrid BWM and VIKOR methodology, Tour Manag 76 (Feb) (2020), https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.06.016.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAirports Control International, Annual Report Airport Carbon Acreditation 2018 - 2019, 2019.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCentral Inteligence Agency (CIA), "Transportation in Mexico ," https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/mexico/#transportation.en_US
dc.relation.referencesDireccion ´ General Adjunta de Aviacion. ´ Agencia Federal de Aviacion ´ Civil, Directorio de Aeropuertos (Comandancias Regionales y de aeropuerto) (XLS), 2021. https://www.gob.mx/afac/acciones-y-programas/directorio-282636 (accessed February 20, 2023).en_US
dc.relation.referencesC. Yan, S. Wang, F. Xiao, D. ce Gao, A multi-level energy performance diagnosis method for energy information poor buildings, Energy 83 (Apr. 2015) 189–203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.014.en_US
dc.relation.referencesY. Geng, W. Ji, B. Lin, J. Hong, Y. Zhu, Building energy performance diagnosis using energy bills and weather data, Energy Build. 172 (Aug. 2018) 181–191, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.04.047en_US
dc.relation.referencesGuidance manual: airport greenhouse gas emissions management [Online]. Available: www.aci.aero, Nov. 2009en_US
dc.relation.referencesS.O. Alba, M. Manana, Energy research in airports: a review, Energies 9 (5) (2016), https://doi.org/10.3390/en9050349en_US
dc.relation.referencesF. Greer, J. Rakas, A. Horvath, Airports and environmental sustainability: a comprehensive review, in: Environmental Research Letters, vol. 15, IOP Publishing Ltd, Oct. 01, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb42a, 10.en_US
dc.relation.referencesC. Koroneos, G. Xydis, A. Polyzakis, The optimal use of renewable energy sources—the case of the new international ’Makedonia’ airport of Thessaloniki, Greece, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14 (6) (Aug. 2010) 1622–1628, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.02.007.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAENA, “Corporate responsibility report 2014 aeropuertos espanoles ˜ navegacion ´ a´erea (AENA) (first ed.),” Madrid, Spain, www.aena.es/csee/Satellite/ sostenibilidad/es/Page/1237564421395//Informe-anual.html, 2015. (Accessed 30 January 2023).en_US
dc.relation.referencesO.F. Yildiz, M. Yilmaz, A. Celik, Reduction of energy consumption and CO2 emissions of HVAC system in airport terminal buildings, Build. Environ. 208 (Jan. 2022) 108632, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108632en_US
dc.relation.referencesP. Upham, C. Thomas, D. Gillingwater, D. Raper, Environmental capacity and airport operations: current issues and future prospects, J Air Transp Manag 9 (3) (May 2003) 145–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(02)00078-9.en_US
dc.relation.referencesG. Baxter, P. Srisaeng, G. Wild, An assessment of airport sustainability, Part 2—energy management at Copenhagen airport, Resources 7 (2) (May 2018) 32, https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7020032.en_US
dc.relation.referencesK. Malik, Assessment of energy consumption pattern and energy conservation potential at Indian airports, J. Constr. Dev. Ctries. (JCDC) 22 (1) (2017) 97–119, https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2017.22.en_US
dc.relation.referencesA.S.H. Abdallah, A. Makram, M. Abdel-Azim Nayel, Energy audit and evaluation of indoor environment condition inside Assiut International Airport terminal building, Egypt, Ain Shams Eng. J. 12 (3) (Sep. 2021) 3241–3253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.03.003.en_US
dc.relation.referencesC. Jurado Bolanos, ˜ Y. Lizcano Sandoval, Calculo de la huella de carbono Aeropuerto el dorado. Bogota: Universidad Libre, Facultad de Ingeniería, 2015en_US
dc.relation.referencesA.N. Nunez ˜ Baladron, ´ Concepto Aeropuerto Verde. Medidas de reduccion ´ de emisiones en aeropuertos y aplicacion ´ al Aeropuerto de Sevilla. Escuela T´ecnica Superior de Ingeniería, 2015. Sevillaen_US
dc.relation.referencesC.A. Balaras, E. Dascalaki, A. Gaglia, K. Droutsa, Energy conservation potential, HVAC installations and operational issues in Hellenic airports, Energy Build. 35 (11) (2003) 1105–1120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.09.006en_US
dc.relation.referencesL.G. Perdamaian, R. Budiarto, M.K. Ridwan, Scenarios to reduce electricity consumption and CO2 emission at terminal 3 soekarno-hatta international airport, Procedia Environ Sci 17 (2013) 576–585, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.073.en_US
dc.relation.referencesF. Sher, et al., Fully solar powered Doncaster Sheffield Airport: energy evaluation, glare analysis and CO2 mitigation, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 45 (Jun. 2021) 101122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101122.en_US
dc.relation.referencesS. Silvester, S.K. Beella, A. van Timmeren, P. Bauer, J. Quist, S. van Dijk, Exploring design scenarios for large-scale implementation of electric vehicles; the Amsterdam Airport Schiphol case, J. Clean. Prod. 48 (Jun. 2013) 211–219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.053.en_US
dc.relation.referencesF. Sher, et al., Fully solar powered Doncaster Sheffield Airport: energy evaluation, glare analysis and CO2 mitigation, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 45 (Jun. 2021) 101122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101122en_US
dc.relation.referencesInternational Organization for Standardization, Energy performance of buildings-Overarching EPB assessment-Part 2: explanation and justification of ISO 52000-2 [Online]. Available: www.iso.org, Jun. 2017.en_US
dc.relation.referencesInternational Organization for Standardization, Energy performance of buildings-Overarching EPB assessment-Part 1: general framework and procedures ISO 52000-1, Online]. Available: www.iso.org, Jun. 2017.en_US
dc.relation.referencesInternational Organization for Standarization, Energy Management Systems ISO 50001, Aug. 2018.en_US
dc.relation.referencesInternational Organization for Standardization, Greenhouse Gases-Part 1: Specification with Guidance at the Organization Level for Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Removals ISO 14064, 2018.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCRE, NOM-016-CRE-2016. Mexico, 2016.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSECRE, NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-001-SECRE-2010, Especificaciones del gas natural. Mexico, 2010.en_US
dc.relation.referencesO.S. Serrano-Guevara, J.I. Huertas, L.F. Quirama, A.E. Mogro, Energy efficiency of heavy-duty vehicles in Mexico, Energies 16 (1) (Jan. 2023), https://doi.org/ 10.3390/en1601045en_US
dc.relation.referencesComision ´ Nacional para el Ahorro de Energía, Eficiencia energ´etica en acondicionadores de aire tipo central, paquete o dividido. Límites, m´etodos de prueba y etiquetado NOM-011-ENER-2006, Jun. 2en_US
dc.relation.referencesComit´e Consultivo Nacional de Normalizacion ´ para la Preservacion ´ y Uso Racional de los Recursos Energ´eticos, Norma oficial Mexicana, eficiencia enrg´etica en sisten_US
dc.relation.referencesSecretaria del Trabajo y Prevension Social, Condiciones de iluminacion ´ en los centros de trabajo NOM-025-STPS-2008, Dec. 2008.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSEMARNAT and INECC, Inventario Nacional de Emisiones de Gases y Compuestos de Efecto Invernadero, 2019. Mexico City.en_US
dc.relation.referencesIPCC, Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution, 2014.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSEMARNAT, Inventario Nacional de Emisiones de Contaminantes Criterio (INEM), Mexico City, 2019en_US
dc.relation.referencesINECC. Factores de emision ´ para los diferentes tipos de combustibles fosiles ´ y alternativos que se consumen en M´exico, 2014, pp. 1–46. https://www.gob.mx/ cms/uploads/attachment/file/110131/CGCCDBC_2014_FE_tipos_combustibles_fosiles.pdf (accessed March 6, 2023).en_US
dc.relation.referencesDBEIS and DEFR, Greenhouse Gas Reporting: Conversion Factors 2021, 2022. London.en_US
dc.relation.referencesServicio Meteorologico ´ Nacional Mexico (SMN), “Informacion ´ Estadística Climatologica, ´ ” NORMALES CLIMATOLOGICAS ´ ESTACION: 00021046 HUEJOTZINGO PERIODO: 1951-2010. . Accessed: February. 6, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://smn.conagua.gob.mx/es/climatologia/informacionclimatologica/informacion-estadistica-climatologica.en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35237en_US


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem