Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGarcía León, Ricardo Andrés
dc.contributor.authorNavarro Barrera, Carlos Josué
dc.contributor.authorAfanador García, Nelson
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-10T15:03:36Z
dc.date.available2026-04-10T15:03:36Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-27
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6185
dc.description.abstractColombia se encuentra en una región con un riesgo sísmico significativo, donde los sistemas de pórticos de hormigón armado constituyen una tipología estructural predominante. A pesar de esta relevancia, la bibliografía existente carece de una evaluación integrada que examine simultáneamente la evolución de las normas de diseño sísmico colombianas (NSR) y la producción científica asociada a su desarrollo y aplicación. Este estudio aborda esta laguna mediante un análisis en dos partes. En primer lugar, una revisión comparativa desde el punto de vista de la ingeniería de las tres versiones principales de la Norma Colombiana de Resistencia Sísmica (CCCSR-84, NSR-98, NSR-10) pone de manifiesto cambios sustanciales en los requisitos de materiales, las normas de detallado, la clasificación de los sistemas estructurales y los principios de diseño de la capacidad. Los resultados indican que la adopción de la NSR-10 supuso un aumento del 15-25 % en la demanda de hormigón y acero, mejorando así la resiliencia y la ductilidad estructural de los edificios de hormigón armado. En segundo lugar, un análisis bibliométrico realizado con Scopus y procesado mediante Bibliometrix examinó 87 documentos, en los que participaron 286 autores, 93 instituciones y 17 países, revelando una tasa de crecimiento anual de las publicaciones del 4,85 % entre 1989 y 2023. Aproximadamente el 75 % de las publicaciones se centran en el hormigón armado y el diseño sísmico, mientras que el 19,5 % implican colaboración internacional. El mapa temático destaca los grupos relacionados con el diseño de estructuras, la ductilidad, la vulnerabilidad sísmica y la rehabilitación. Estos resultados ponen de relieve el progresivo perfeccionamiento de la normativa sísmica colombiana y su creciente impacto en la investigación académica, lo que contribuye a promover prácticas de diseño sísmico más seguras y resilientes en el país.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relationhttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/23/4303en_US
dc.titleNormativa colombiana sobre el diseño sísmico de edificios de hormigón armado con estructuras de pórtico: un análisis comparativo y bibliométricoen_US
dc.title.translatedColombian Regulations in the Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Portal Frames: A Comparative and Bibliometric Analysisen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacRicardo Andrés García León [0001454975]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacNelson Afanador García [0000226920]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarRicardo Andrés García León [emeJT3sAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarNelson Afanador García [8Uk1lqUAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidRicardo Andrés García León [0000-0002-2734-1425]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidNelson Afanador García [0000-0001-5463-2036]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateRicardo Andrés García León [Ricardo-Garcia-Leon]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateNelson Afanador García [Nelson-Afanador]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusRicardo Andrés García León [57192545232]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusNelson Afanador García [57202680756]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishColombia is located in a region of significant seismic hazard, where reinforced concrete portal frame systems represent a dominant structural typology. Despite this relevance, the existing literature lacks an integrated evaluation that simultaneously examines the evolution of Colombian seismic design regulations (NSR) and the scientific production associated with their development and application. This study addresses this gap by conducting a two-part analysis. First, a comparative engineering review of the three main versions of the Colombian Earthquake Resistant Standard (CCCSR-84, NSR-98, NSR-10) demonstrates substantial changes in material requirements, detailing rules, structural system classification, and capacity design principles. Results indicate that adopting NSR-10 led to a 15–25% increase in concrete and steel demand, thereby improving structural resilience and ductility in reinforced concrete buildings. Second, a bibliometric analysis using Scopus and processed through Bibliometrix examined 87 documents, involving 286 authors, 93 institutions, and 17 countries, revealing an annual publication growth rate of 4.85% between 1989 and 2023. Approximately 75% of the publications focus on reinforced concrete and seismic design, whereas 19.5% involve international collaboration. The thematic mapping highlights clusters related to capacity design, ductility, seismic vulnerability, and retrofitting. These findings underscore the progressive refinement of Colombian seismic regulations and their growing impact on academic research, advancing safer, more resilient seismic design practices in the country.en_US
dc.subject.proposalNormativa colombianaen_US
dc.subject.proposalNSRen_US
dc.subject.proposalDiseño sísmicoen_US
dc.subject.proposalEdificios de hormigón armadoen_US
dc.subject.proposalEstructuras de pórticoen_US
dc.subject.proposalAnálisis comparativoen_US
dc.subject.keywordsColombian regulationsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsNSRen_US
dc.subject.keywordsSeismic designen_US
dc.subject.keywordsReinforced concrete buildingsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPortal framesen_US
dc.subject.keywordsComparative analysisen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesCCCSR-84. 1984. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/627094926/c-c-c-s-r-84 (accessed on 25 November 2025).en_US
dc.relation.referencesNSR-98. 1998. Available online: https://curaduriaunoibague.com/documentos/nacional/N-6.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2025).en_US
dc.relation.referencesNSR-10. 2010. Available online: https://www.unisdr.org/campaign/resilientcities/uploads/city/attachments/3871-10684.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2025).en_US
dc.relation.referencesSalgado-Gálvez, M.; Bernal, G.; Yamin, L.; Cardona, O. Seismic Hazard Assessment in Colombia. Updates and Usage in the New National Building Code NSR-10. Rev. Ing. 2010, 28–37. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262427631_ Seismic_Hazard_Assessment_in_Colombia_Updates_and_Usage_in_the_New_National_Building_Code_NSR-10 (accessed on 25 November 2025).en_US
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, L.E. Desarrollo de la normativa sismo resistente colombiana en los 30 años desde su primera expedición. Rev. Ing. 2014, 71–77. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276585102_Desarrollo_de_la_Normativa_Sismo_Resistente _Colombiana_en_los_30_anos_desde_su_primera_expedicion (accessed on 25 November 2025). [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesCriado-Rodríguez, D.M.; Pacheco-Vergel,W.A.; Afanador-García, N. Vulnerabilidad sísmica de centros poblados: Estudio de caso. Rev. Ingenio 2020, 17, 43–48. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAmariles López, C.; Ramírez-Sepúlveda, D.; Cano-Saldaña, L. Comparación entre el ACI-318-19 y la NSR-10 para diseño estructural de pórticos de concreto en zonas de amenaza sísmica alta: Comparison between ACI-318-19 and NSR-10 for structural design of concrete frames in high seismic hazard zones. Cienc. E Ing. Neogranadina 2022, 32, 115–129. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesLuo, H.; Paal, S.G. Artificial intelligence-enhanced seismic response prediction of reinforced concrete frames. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2022, 52, 101568. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesLazaridis, P.C.; Kavvadias, I.E.; Demertzis, K.; Iliadis, L.; Vasiliadis, L.K. Structural Damage Prediction of a Reinforced Concrete Frame under Single and Multiple Seismic Events Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3845. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAhumada Mastrodoménico, A.M. Análisis Comparativo del Diseño para una Edificación de 5 Niveles, según las Normas Colombianas de Sismoresistencia NSR-98 y la NSR-10, en zona de Amenaza Sísmica Intermedia. Available online: https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/entities/publication/97ea5c21-a366-42d0-9a68-07ef2b38199b (accessed on 24 January 2025).en_US
dc.relation.referencesAlvarado Perez, E.E.; Bustos Linares, B.; Quintero Rojas, C. Análisis de Vulnerabilidad Sísmica Estructural caso Asentamiento Subnormal Barrio Hacienda Los Molinos Localidad Rafael Uribe Uribe de Bogotá D.C. 2015. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/11396/3480 (accessed on 15 June 2025).en_US
dc.relation.referencesAranda-Nieves, S.; Díaz-Portilla, M. Comparación Técnica Entre el Reglamento Colombiano de Construcción Sismo Resistente NSR-98 y el Reglamento Colombiano de Construcción Sismo Resistente NRS-10 en Edificaciones en la Ciudad de Bogotá. 2017. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10983/15218 (accessed on 2 August 2025).en_US
dc.relation.referencesAcosta Rodríguez, D.L. Análisis Estructural con ETABS, Aplicando Reglamento Colombiano de Construcción Sismo Resistente (NSR-10). 2016. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11634/2677 (accessed on 24 January 2025).en_US
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-León, R.A.; Martínez-Trinidad, J.; Campos-Silva, I. Historical Review on the Boriding Process using Bibliometric Analysis. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 2021, 74, 541–557. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAguillo, I.F. Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics 2012, 91, 343–351. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-León, R.A.; Afanador-García, N.; Guerrero-Gómez, G. A Scientometric Review on Tribocorrosion in Hard Coatings. J. Bio-Tribo-Corros. 2023, 9, 39. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesJaramillo, H.Y.; Vasco-Echeverri, O.H.; Moreno-Pacheco, L.A.; García-León, R.A. Biomaterials in Concrete for Engineering Applications: A Bibliometric Review. Infrastructures 2023, 8, 161. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesJaramillo, H.Y.; Vasco-Echeverri, O.; López-Barrios, R.; García-León, R.A. Optimization of Bio-Brick Composition Using Agricultural Waste: Mechanical Properties and Sustainable Applications. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1914. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesVillar-Salinas, S.; Guzmán, A.; Carrillo, J. Performance evaluation of structures with reinforced concrete columns retrofitted with steel jacketing. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 33, 101510. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesCarrillo, J.; Lizarazo-Marriaga, J.; Lamus, F. Properties of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Using Either Industrial or Recycled Fibers fromWaste Tires. Fibers Polym. 2020, 21, 2055–2067. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesLerchie, W.; Schellekens, A.N.;Warner, N.P. Lattices and strings. Phys. Rep. 1989, 177, 1–140. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesWitharana, C.; Civco, D.L.; Meyer, T.H. Evaluation of data fusion and image segmentation in earth observation based rapid mapping workflows. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2014, 87, 1–18. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesIssa, M.A.; Thilan, O.; Mustapha, I. Shear Behavior of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams with and without Basalt FRP Stirrups. J. Compos. Constr. 2016, 20, 4015083. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesCai, Z.-K.; Wang, Z.; Yang, T.Y. Experimental testing and modeling of precast segmental bridge columns with hybrid normal- and high-strength steel rebars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 166, 945–955. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesCasapu, M.; Grunwaldt, J.-D.; Maciejewski, M.; Krumeich, F.; Baiker, A.; Wittrock, M.; Eckhoff, S. Comparative study of structural properties and NOx storage-reduction behavior of Pt/Ba/CeO2 and Pt/Ba/Al2O3. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 78, 288–300. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesShibazaki, Y.; Kohno, H.; Hamatani, M. An innovative platform for high-throughput high-accuracy lithography using a single wafer stage. Proc. SPIE 2009, 7274, 72741I. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesLi, J.-R.; Bu, X.-H.; Jiao, J.; Du,W.-P.; Xu, X.-H.; Zhang, R.-H. Novel dithioether–silver(i) coordination architectures: Structural diversities by varying the spacers and terminal groups of ligands. Dalt. Trans. 2005, 464–474. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesPeled, A.; Jones, J.; Shah, S.P. Effect of matrix modification on durability of glass fiber reinforced cement composites. Mater. Struct. 2005, 38, 163–171. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesKachapi, S.H.H.; Dardel, M.; Daniali, H.M.; Fathi, A. Nonlinear dynamics and stability analysis of piezo-visco medium nanoshell resonator with electrostatic and harmonic actuation. Appl. Math. Model. 2019, 75, 279–309. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesKüchler, R.; Kanert, O.; Fricke, M.; Jain, H.; Ngai, K.L. Study of nuclear spin relaxation in CLAP glasses. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 1994, 172–174, 1373–1377. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesGuo, A. Structural analysis of a Guadua bamboo bridge in Colombia. Sustain. Struct. 2022, 2, 20. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesArchila-Santos, H.F.; Ansell, M.P.; Walker, P. Low Carbon Construction Using Guadua Bamboo in Colombia. Key Eng. Mater. 2012, 517, 127–134. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesLu, W.; Luo, X.; Yang, Y.; Le, W.; Huang, B.; Li, P. Co-free non-equilibrium medium-entropy alloy with outstanding tensile properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 833, 155074. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesMora, M.G.; Valcárcel, J.A.; Cardona, O.D.; Pujades, L.G.; Barbat, A.H.; Bernal, G.A. Prioritizing Interventions to Reduce Seismic Vulnerability in School Facilities in Colombia. Earthq. Spectra 2015, 31, 2535–2552. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesFiore, M.; Saville, P. List Objects with Algebraic Structure. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction, Oxford, UK, 3–9 September 2017; Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik: Dagstuhl, Germany, 2017; pp. 16:1–16:18. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesJulián, C. Analysis of the Earthquake-Resistant Design Approach for Buildings in Mexico. Ing. Investig. Tecnol. 2014, 15, 151–162. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Z.; Qian, S.; Zhang, Q.; Li, L. Advanced Concrete Technology and Its Structural Applications. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2022, 2022, 9781273. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesFEMA-P695. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. FEMA: Sacramento, CA, USA, 2009. Available online: https://nehrpsearch.nist.gov/static/files/FEMA/fema_p695.pdf (accessed on 16 August 2025).en_US
dc.relation.referencesSantana, G.; Committee, A.C.I. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2019. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesCevallos-Velásquez, O.A.; Guerra-Valladares, M.D.; Marcillo-Zapata, C.A.; Quinatoa-Martínez, J.G. Evolución histórica de las normativas de diseño sismo resistente en América Latina. Casos de estudio: Colombia, Ecuador, Perú, Chile. Rev. Científica INGENIAR Ing. Tecnol. Investig. 2024, 7, 2–25.en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15234303en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record