Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

La combustión sin llama como alternativa para mejorar la eficiencia de los sistemas térmicos: revisión del estado actual de la técnica

dc.contributor.authorVanegas Trujillo, Esteban
dc.contributor.authorLuna DelRisco, Mario
dc.contributor.authorRocha Meneses, Lisandra
dc.contributor.authorArrieta Gonzalez, Carlos Ernesto
dc.contributor.authorYepes Tumay, Hernando Alexander
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-09T16:24:20Z
dc.date.available2026-04-09T16:24:20Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-01
dc.identifier.issn2528-1410en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6182
dc.description.abstractLa producción de hidrógeno (H₂) es una estrategia clave para reducir las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero, ya que ofrece una alternativa energética limpia y eficiente. Esta revisión analiza la combustión en bucle químico (CLC) para la producción de H₂, centrándose en las materias primas, los portadores de oxígeno (OC) y la modelización del proceso en Aspen Plus®. Se llevó a cabo un análisis bibliométrico para respaldar la revisión. Los resultados indican que el metano (CH₄) supera a la biomasa debido a su mayor eficiencia y a su comportamiento de reacción estable. Los óxidos a base de hierro y níquel son los OC más eficaces, ya que el hierro facilita la división del agua y el níquel destaca en la reformación de metano con vapor (SMR) y en la reformación por ciclo químico (CLR). La mejora de los OC con materiales de soporte y sorbentes mejora el rendimiento del sistema. Las simulaciones precisas que utilizan Rgibbs y modelos de lecho fluidizado son esenciales para optimizar el proceso. Este estudio ofrece información para mejorar la eficiencia de la producción de H₂, contribuyendo a los avances en las tecnologías de energía limpia.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relationhttps://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ijost/article/view/82075en_US
dc.titleLa combustión sin llama como alternativa para mejorar la eficiencia de los sistemas térmicos: revisión del estado actual de la técnicaen_US
dc.title.translatedFlameless combustion as an alternative for improving the efficiency of thermal systems: state-of-the-art reviewen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacEsteban Vanegas Trujillo [0002041870]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacCarlos Ernesto Arrieta Gonzalez(0001435094)en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay(0001229087)en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarEsteban Vanegas Trujillo [EsndSVgAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarMario Luna DelRisco [J76rfbcAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarLisandra Rocha Meneses [Sl0Kp7MAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarCarlos Ernesto Arrieta Gonzalez(NLn9xE8AAAAJ)en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay(sev_U34AAAAJ)en_US
dc.contributor.orcidEsteban Vanegas Trujillo [0000-0003-3687-7667]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidMario Luna DelRisco [0000-0002-4679-2125]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidLisandra Rocha Meneses [0000-0003-1196-9522]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidCarlos Ernesto Arrieta Gonzalez(0000-0003-0839-6102)en_US
dc.contributor.orcidHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay(0000-0001-9399-5673)en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateEsteban Vanegas Trujillo [Esteban-Vanegas-Trujillo]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateMario Luna DelRisco [Mario-Luna-delRisco]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay(Hernando-Yepes)en_US
dc.contributor.scopusEsteban Vanegas Trujillo [59341468400]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusMario Luna DelRisco [37032621900]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusLisandra Rocha Meneses [57194285359]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusCarlos Ernesto Arrieta Gonzalez(59158098500)en_US
dc.contributor.scopusHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay(55675200900)en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishHydrogen (H₂) production is a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, providing a clean and efficient energy alternative. This review explores chemical looping combustion (CLC) for H₂ production, focusing on feedstocks, oxygen carriers (OCs), and process modeling in Aspen Plus®. A bibliometric analysis was conducted to support the review. Results indicate that methane (CH₄) outperforms biomass due to its higher efficiency and stable reaction behavior. Iron- and nickel-based oxides are the most effective OCs, with iron facilitating water splitting and nickel excelling in steam methane reforming (SMR) and chemical looping reforming (CLR). Enhancing OCs with support materials and sorbents improves system performance. Accurate simulations using Rgibbs and fluidized bed models are essential for optimizing the process. This study provides insights into improving H₂ production efficiency, contributing to advancements in clean energy technologies.en_US
dc.subject.proposalAspen Plusen_US
dc.subject.proposalCircuito químicoen_US
dc.subject.proposalCaptura de CO₂en_US
dc.subject.proposalMateria primaen_US
dc.subject.proposalHidrógenoen_US
dc.subject.proposalTransportador de oxígenoen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAspen plusen_US
dc.subject.keywordsChemical loopingen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCO2 captureen_US
dc.subject.keywordsFeedstocken_US
dc.subject.keywordsHydrogenen_US
dc.subject.keywordsOxygen carrieren_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, B. M., Hansen, J., Rioux, J., Stirling, C. M., Twomlow, S., and Eva (Lini) Wollenberg. (2018). Urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts (SDG 13): Transforming agriculture and food systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34, 13-20.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRamezani, R., Di Felice, L., and Gallucci, F. (2023). A review of chemical looping reforming technologies for hydrogen production: Recent advances and future challenges. Journal of Physics: Energy, 5(2), 024010en_US
dc.relation.referencesLi, J., Zhang, H., Gao, Z., Fu, J., Ao, W., and Dai, J. (2017). CO2 capture with chemical looping combustion of gaseous fuels: An overview. Energy and Fuels, 31(4), 3475-3524.en_US
dc.relation.referencesJacobson, T. A., Kler, J. S., Hernke, M. T., Braun, R. K., Meyer, K. C., and Funk, W. E. (2019). Direct human health risks of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nature Sustainability, 2(8), 691-701.en_US
dc.relation.referencesStoppacher, B., Sterniczky, T., Bock, S., and Hacker, V. (2022). On-site production of high-purity hydrogen from raw biogas with fixed-bed chemical looping. Energy Conversion and Management, 268, 115971en_US
dc.relation.referencesLuo, M., Yi, Y., Wang, S., Wang, Z., Du, M., Pan, J., and Wang, Q. (2018). Review of hydrogen production using chemical-looping technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 3186-3214.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBanerjee, S., and Agarwal, R. (2015). Transient reacting flow simulation of spouted fluidized bed for coal-direct chemical looping combustion with different Fe-based oxygen carriers. Applied Energy, 160, 552-560.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhou, L., Deshpande, K., Zhang, X., and Agarwal, R. K. (2020). Process simulation of chemical looping combustion using ASPEN plus for a mixture of biomass and coal with various oxygen carriers. Energy, 195, 116955.en_US
dc.relation.referencesJasper, M., Shahbazi, A., Schimmel, K., Li, F., and Wang, L. (2023). Aspen Plus simulation of Chemical Looping Combustion of syngas and methane in fluidized beds. Discover Chemical Engineering, 3(1), 4.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKappagantula, R. V., Ingram, G. D., and Vuthaluru, H. B. (2022). Application of aspen plus fluidized bed reactor model for chemical looping of synthesis gas. Fuel, 324, 124698.en_US
dc.relation.referencesQi, J., Liu, J., Chen, G., Yao, J., Yan, B., Yi, W., Zao, H., and Xu, S. (2023). Hydrogen production from municipal solid waste via chemical looping gasification using CuFe2O4 spinel as oxygen carrier: An Aspen Plus modeling. Energy Conversion and Management, 294, 117562.en_US
dc.relation.referencesNandiyanto, A. B. D., Ragadhita, R., Fiandini, M., Al Husaeni, D. N., and Aziz, M. (2023). The role of iron oxide in hydrogen production: Theory and bibliometric analyses. Moroccan Journal of Chemistry, 11(04), 897-916.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRochman, S., Rustaman, N., Ramalis, T. R., Amri, K., Zukmadini, A. Y., Ismail, I., and Putra, A. H. (2024). How bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer is based on artificial intelligence data (using ResearchRabbit Data): Explore research trends in hydrology content. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(2), 251-294.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAl Husaeni, D. N., and Al Husaeni, D. F. (2022). How to calculate bibliometrics using vosviewer with publish or perish (using Scopus data): Science education keywords. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 2(3), 247-274.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAl Husaeni, D. F., and Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). Bibliometric using Vosviewer with Publish or Perish (using Google Scholar data): From step-by-step processing for users to the practical examples in the analysis of digital learning articles in pre and post Covid-19 pandemic. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(1), 19-46.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMarín-Rodríguez, N. J., Vega, J., Zanabria, O. B., González-Ruiz, J. D., and Botero, S. (2024). Towards an understanding of landslide risk assessment and its economic losses: A scientometric analysis. Landslides, 21(8), 1865-1881.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAugusto, B., Rafael, S., Coelho, M. C., and Ferreira, J. (2024). Connecting the dots between urban morphology and the air quality of cities under a changing climate: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 16(1), 18.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Y., Chen, S., Yang, B., Liu, K., and Zheng, C. (2015). First and second thermodynamic-law comparison of biogas MILD oxy-fuel combustion moderated by CO2 or H2O. Energy Conversion and Management, 106, 625-634.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSurendra, K. C., Takara, D., Hashimoto, A. G., and Khanal, S. K. (2014). Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 846-859.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKong, F., Swift, J., Zhang, Q., Fan, L. S., and Tong, A. (2020). Biogas to H2 conversion with CO2 capture using chemical looping technology: Process simulation and comparison to conventional reforming processes. Fuel, 279, 118479en_US
dc.relation.referencesRasi, S., Veijanen, A., and Rintala, J. (2007). Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants. Energy, 32(8), 1375-1380.en_US
dc.relation.referencesNahar, G., Mote, D., and Dupont, V. (2017). Hydrogen production from reforming of biogas: Review of technological advances and an Indian perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 1032-1052.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhao, X., Joseph, B., Kuhn, J., and Ozcan, S. (2020). Biogas reforming to syngas: A review. IScience, 23(5), 1-46.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMendiara, T., Cabello, A., Izquierdo, M. T., Abad, A., Mattisson, T., and Adánez, J. (2021). Effect of the presence of siloxanes in biogas chemical looping combustion. Energy and Fuels, 35(18), 14984-14994.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPandey, B., Prajapati, Y. K., and Sheth, P. N. (2019). Recent progress in thermochemical techniques to produce hydrogen gas from biomass: A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(47), 25384-25415.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhao, X., Zhou, H., Sikarwar, V. S., Zhao, M., Park, A. H. A., Fennell, P. S., Shen, L., and Fan, L. S. (2017). Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: The good, the bad and the future. Energy and Environmental Science, 10(9), 1885-1910.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMarrugo, G., Valdes, C. F., and Chejne, F. (2016). Characterization of Colombian agroindustrial biomass residues as energy resources. Energy and Fuels, 30(10), 8386-8398.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMercado, J. P., Ubando, A. T., Gonzaga, J. A., and Naqvi, S. R. (2023). Life cycle assessment of a biomass based chemical looping combustion. Environmental Research, 217, 114876.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAdánez-Rubio, I., Abad, A., Gayán, P., De Diego, L. F., García-Labiano, F., and Adánez, J. (2014). Biomass combustion with CO2 capture by chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU). Fuel Processing Technology, 124, 104-114.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCoppola, A., and Scala, F. (2021). Chemical looping for combustion of solid biomass: A review. Energy and Fuels, 35(23), 19248-19265.en_US
dc.relation.referencesStenberg, V., Ryden, M., Mattisson, T., and Lyngfelt, A. (2018). Exploring novel hydrogen production processes by integration of steam methane reforming with chemical-looping combustion (CLC-SMR) and oxygen carrier aided combustion (OCAC-SMR). International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 74, 28-39.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMagdziarz, A., Dalai, A. K., and Koziński, J. A. (2016). Chemical composition, character, and reactivity of renewable fuel ashes. Fuel, 176, 135-145.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAjorloo, M., Ghodrat, M., Scott, J., and Strezov, V. (2022). Recent advances in thermodynamic analysis of biomass gasification: A review on numerical modelling and simulation. Journal of the Energy Institute, 102, 395-419.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPenthor, S., Mayer, K., Kern, S., Kitzler, H., Wöss, D., Pröll, T., and Hofbauer, H. (2014). Chemical-looping combustion of raw syngas from biomass steam gasification–Coupled operation of two dual fluidized bed pilot plants. Fuel, 127, 178-185.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSamprón, I., Cabello, A., García-Labiano, F., Izquierdo, M. T., and de Diego, L. F. (2023). An innovative Cu-Al oxygen carrier for the biomass chemical looping gasification process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 465, 142919.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSalkuyeh, Y. K., Saville, B. A., and MacLean, H. L. (2018). Techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from different biomass gasification processes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(20), 9514-9528.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGopaul, S. G., Dutta, A., and Clemmer, R. (2014). Chemical looping gasification for hydrogen production: A comparison of two unique processes simulated using ASPEN Plus. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(11), 5804-5817.en_US
dc.relation.referencesNimmas, T., Wongsakulphasatch, S., Cheng, C. K., and Assabumrungrat, S. (2020). Bi-metallic CuO-NiO based multifunctional material for hydrogen production from sorption-enhanced chemical looping autothermal reforming of ethanol. Chemical Engineering Journal, 398, 125543.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Díez, E., García-Labiano, F., De Diego, L. F., Abad, A., Gayán, P., Adánez, J., and Ruíz, J. A. C. (2016). Optimization of hydrogen production with CO2 capture by autothermal chemical-looping reforming using different bioethanol purities. Applied Energy, 169, 491-498.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLi, G., Zhang, Z., You, F., Pan, Z., Zhang, X., Dong, J., and Gao, X. (2013). A novel strategy for hydrous-ethanol utilization: Demonstration of a spark-ignition engine fueled with hydrogen-rich fuel from an onboard ethanol/steam reformer. International journal of hydrogen energy, 38(14), 5936-5948.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, K., Dou, B., Jiang, B., Song, Y., Zhang, C., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., and Xu, Y. (2016). Renewable hydrogen production from chemical looping steam reforming of ethanol using xCeNi/SBA-15 oxygen carriers in a fixed-bed reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(30), 12899-12909.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAdánez-Rubio, I., Ruiz, J. A., García-Labiano, F., de Diego, L. F., and Adánez, J. (2021). Use of bio-glycerol for the production of synthesis gas by chemical looping reforming. Fuel, 288, 119578.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCharisiou, N. D., Italiano, C., Pino, L., Sebastian, V., Vita, A., and Goula, M. A. (2020). Hydrogen production via steam reforming of glycerol over Rh/γ-Al2O3 catalysts modified with CeO2, MgO or La2O3. Renewable Energy, 162, 908-925.en_US
dc.relation.referencesJiang, B., Dou, B., Song, Y., Zhang, C., Du, B., Chen, H., ... and Xu, Y. (2015). Hydrogen production from chemical looping steam reforming of glycerol by Ni-based oxygen carrier in a fixed-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 280, 459-467.en_US
dc.relation.referencesJiang, B., Dou, B., Song, Y., Zhang, C., Du, B., Chen, H., ... and Xu, Y. (2015). Hydrogen production from chemical looping steam reforming of glycerol by Ni-based oxygen carrier in a fixed-bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 280, 459-467.en_US
dc.relation.referencesVoitic, G., and Hacker, V. (2016). Recent advancements in chemical looping water splitting for the production of hydrogen. Rsc Advances, 6(100), 98267-98296.en_US
dc.relation.referencesXu, T., Jiang, C., Wang, X., and Xiao, B. (2021). Bio-oil chemical looping reforming coupled with water splitting for hydrogen and syngas coproduction: Effect of supports on the performance of Ni-Fe bimetallic oxygen carriers. Energy Conversion and Management, 244, 114512.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKhan, M. N., and Shamim, T. (2014). Investigation of hydrogen production using chemical looping reforming. Energy Procedia, 61, 2034-2037.en_US
dc.relation.referencesNadgouda, S. G., Kathe, M. V., and Fan, L. S. (2017). Cold gas efficiency enhancement in a chemical looping combustion system using staged H2 separation approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(8), 4751-4763.en_US
dc.relation.referencesYang, Q., Yan, M., Zhang, L., Xia, X., Zhu, Y., Zhang, C., Zhao, B., Xiaoxun M., and Wang, X. (2021). Thermodynamic analysis of chemical looping coupling process for coproducing syngas and hydrogen with in situ CO2 utilization. Energy Conversion and Management, 231, 113845.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHe, Y., Zhu, L., Li, L., and Liu, G. (2020). Hydrogen and power cogeneration based on chemical looping combustion: Is it capable of reducing carbon emissions and the cost of production?. Energy and Fuels, 34(3), 3501-3512.en_US
dc.relation.referencesArgyris, P. A., Wright, A., Qazvini, O. T., and Spallina, V. (2022). Dynamic behaviour of integrated chemical looping process with pressure swing adsorption in small scale on-site H2 and pure CO2 production. Chemical Engineering Journal, 428, 132606.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAdánez-Rubio, I., García-Labiano, F., Abad, A., de Diego, L. F., and Adánez, J. (2022). Synthesis gas and H2 production by chemical looping reforming using bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of wood as raw material. Chemical Engineering Journal, 431, 133376.en_US
dc.relation.referencesYahom, A., Powell, J., Pavarajarn, V., Onbhuddha, P., Charojrochkul, S., and Assabumrungrat, S. (2014). Simulation and thermodynamic analysis of chemical looping reforming and CO2 enhanced chemical looping reforming. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 92(11), 2575-2583.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLu, C., Xu, R., khan Muhammad, I., Zhu, X., Wei, Y., Qi, X., and Li, K. (2021). Thermodynamic evolution of magnetite oxygen carrier via chemical looping reforming of methane. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 85, 103704.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMiyahira, K., and Aziz, M. (2022). Hydrogen and ammonia production from low-grade agricultural waste adopting chemical looping process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372, 133827.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAdanez, J., Abad, A., Garcia-Labiano, F., Gayan, P., & De Diego, L. F. (2012). Progress in chemical-looping combustion and reforming technologies. Progress in energy and combustion science, 38(2), 215-282.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHu, J., Zhang, T., Zhang, Q., Yan, X., Zhao, S., Dang, J., and Wang, W. (2021). Application of calcium oxide/ferric oxide composite oxygen carrier for corn straw chemical looping gasification. Bioresource Technology, 330, 125011.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLiu, G., and Lisak, G. (2023). Cu-based oxygen carriers for chemical looping processes: Opportunities and challenges. Fuel, 342, 127828.en_US
dc.relation.referencesde las Obras Loscertales, M., Abad, A., García-Labiano, F., Ruiz, J. A., and Adánez, J. (2023). Reaction kinetics of a NiO-based oxygen carrier with ethanol to be applied in chemical looping processes. Fuel, 345, 128163.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSun, Z., and Aziz, M. (2021). Thermodynamic analysis of a tri-generation system driven by biomass direct chemical looping combustion process. Energy Conversion and Management, 244, 114517.en_US
dc.relation.referencesYu, Z., Yang, Y., Yang, S., Zhang, Q., Zhao, J., Fang, Y., Xiaogang, H., and Guan, G. (2019). Iron-based oxygen carriers in chemical looping conversions: A review. Carbon Resources Conversion, 2(1), 23-34.en_US
dc.relation.referencesFang, H., Haibin, L., and Zengli, Z. (2009). Advancements in development of chemical‐looping combustion: A review. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009(1), 710515.en_US
dc.relation.referencesDi, Z., Cao, Y., Yang, F., Zhang, K., and Cheng, F. (2019). Thermodynamic analysis on the parametric optimization of a novel chemical looping methane reforming in the separated productions of H2 and CO. Energy Conversion and Management, 192, 171-179.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGao, G., Lai, Y., and Wang, S. (2023). Particle-resolved simulation of Fe-based oxygen carrier in chemical looping hydrogen generation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 48(89), 34624-34633.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRoslan, N. A., Abidin, S. Z., Ideris, A., and Vo, D. V. N. (2020). A review on glycerol reforming processes over Ni-based catalyst for hydrogen and syngas productions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(36), 18466-18489.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhu, L., Xie, N., Jiang, P., Li, L., and Chen, H. (2016). Double-stage chemical looping combustion combined with sorption enhanced natural gas steam reforming process for hydrogen and power cogeneration: Thermodynamic investigation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 114, 247-257.en_US
dc.relation.referencesStenberg, V., Spallina, V., Mattisson, T., and Rydén, M. (2021). Techno-economic analysis of processes with integration of fluidized bed heat exchangers for H2 production–Part 2: Chemical-looping combustion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(50), 25355-25375.en_US
dc.relation.referencesDas, S., Biswas, A., Tiwary, C. S., and Paliwal, M. (2022). Hydrogen production using chemical looping technology: A review with emphasis on H2 yield of various oxygen carriers. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(66), 28322-28352.en_US
dc.relation.referencesChen, X., Zou, G., Yuan, Y., Xu, Z., and Zhao, H. (2023). Flame spray pyrolysis synthesized Ni-doped Fe/Ce oxygen carriers for chemical looping dry reforming of methane. Fuel, 343, 127913.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHerrer, M., Plou, J., Durán, P., Herguido, J., and Peña, J. A. (2015). Hydrogen from synthetic biogas via SIP using NiAl2O4 catalyst: Reduction stage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40(15), 5244-5250.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPlou, J., Durán, P., Herguido, J., and Peña, J. A. (2014). Purified hydrogen from synthetic biogas by joint methane dry reforming and steam-iron process: Behaviour of metallic oxides and coke formation. Fuel, 118, 100-106.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLuo, C., Dou, B., Zhang, H., Liu, D., Zhao, L., Chen, H., and Xu, Y. (2021). Co-production of hydrogen and syngas from chemical looping water splitting coupled with decomposition of glycerol using Fe-Ce-Ni based oxygen carriers. Energy Conversion and Management, 238, 114166.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHosseini, S. Y., Khosravi-Nikou, M. R., and Shariati, A. (2019). Production of hydrogen and syngas using chemical looping technology via cerium-iron mixed oxides. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 139, 23-33.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWei, G., Huang, J., Fan, Y., Huang, Z., Zheng, A., He, F., Junguang, M., Dongyan, Z., Kun, Z., Zenglin, Z., and Li, H. (2019). Chemical looping reforming of biomass based pyrolysis gas coupling with chemical looping hydrogen by using Fe/Ni/Al oxygen carriers derived from LDH precursors. Energy Conversion and Management, 179, 304-313.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, N., Guo, X., Ma, S., and Feng, Y. (2023). Understanding the synergistic effect of Ni/Al2O3 on CO2 adsorption and sintering properties of CaO in sorption-enhanced steam reforming process. Fuel, 341, 127766.en_US
dc.relation.referencesNandy, A., Loha, C., Gu, S., Sarkar, P., Karmakar, M. K., and Chatterjee, P. K. (2016). Present status and overview of chemical looping combustion technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59, 597-619.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAbbasi, M., Farniaei, M., Rahimpour, M. R., and Shariati, A. (2015). Simultaneous syngas production with different H2/CO ratio in a multi-tubular methane steam and dry reformer by utilizing of CLC. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 24(1), 54-64.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAlirezaei, I., Hafizi, A., and Rahimpour, M. R. (2018). Syngas production in chemical looping reforming process over ZrO2 promoted Mn-based catalyst. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 23, 105-116.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHossain, M. M., and de Lasa, H. I. (2008). Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—a review. Chemical Engineering Science, 63(18), 4433-4451.en_US
dc.relation.referencesIdziak, K., Czakiert, T., Krzywanski, J., Zylka, A., Kozlowska, M., and Nowak, W. (2020). Safety and environmental reasons for the use of Ni-, Co-, Cu-, Mn-and Fe-based oxygen carriers in CLC/CLOU applications: An overview. Fuel, 268, 117245.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAbuelgasim, S., Wang, W., and Abdalazeez, A. (2021). A brief review for chemical looping combustion as a promising CO2 capture technology: Fundamentals and progress. Science of The Total Environment, 764, 142892.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, B., Li, H., Wang, W., Luo, C., and Mei, D. (2020). Chemical looping combustion of lignite with the CaSO4–CoO mixed oxygen carrier. Journal of the Energy Institute, 93(3), 1229-1241.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZheng, M., Shen, L., and Feng, X. (2014). In situ gasification chemical looping combustion of a coal using the binary oxygen carrier natural anhydrite ore and natural iron ore. Energy conversion and management, 83, 270-283.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, B., Guo, C., Xu, B., Li, X., Ma, J., Ji, J., Mei, D., and Zhao, H. (2021). Synergistic reaction investigation of the NiO modified CaSO4 oxygen carrier with lignite for simultaneous CO2 capture and SO2 removal. Fuel Processing Technology, 220, 106895.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSong, T., Zheng, M., Shen, L., Zhang, T., Niu, X., and Xiao, J. (2013). Mechanism investigation of enhancing reaction performance with CaSO4/Fe2O3 oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion of coal. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(11), 4059-4071.en_US
dc.relation.referencesDi, Z., Yang, F., Cao, Y., Zhang, K., Guo, Y., Gao, S., and Cheng, F. (2019). The transformation pathways on the catalytic and stability-promoted CaSO4 reduction in CLC process using Fe2O3 supported. Fuel, 253, 327-338.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHeidari, M., Tahmasebpoor, M., Antzaras, A., and Lemonidou, A. A. (2020). CO2 capture and fluidity performance of CaO-based sorbents: Effect of Zr, Al and Ce additives in tri-, bi-and mono-metallic configurations. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 144, 349-365.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhu, L., Li, L., and Fan, J. (2015). A modified process for overcoming the drawbacks of conventional steam methane reforming for hydrogen production: Thermodynamic investigation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 104, 792-806.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGanesh, I. (2013). A review on magnesium aluminate (MgAl2O4) spinel: Synthesis, processing and applications. International Materials Reviews, 58(2), 63-112en_US
dc.relation.referencesHafizi, A., and Rahimpour, M. R. (2018). Inhibiting Fe–Al spinel formation on a narrowed mesopore-sized MgAl2O4 support as a novel catalyst for H2 production in chemical looping technology. Catalysts, 8(1), 27.en_US
dc.relation.referencesNascimento, R. A., Medeiros, R. L., Costa, T. R., Oliveira, Â. A., Macedo, H. P., Melo, M. A., and Melo, D. M. (2020). Mn/MgAl 2 O 4 oxygen carriers for chemical looping combustion using coal: Influence of the thermal treatment on the structure and reactivity. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 140, 2673-2685.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCabello, A., Dueso, C., García-Labiano, F., Gayán, P., Abad, A., De Diego, L. F., and Adánez, J. (2014). Performance of a highly reactive impregnated Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier with CH4 and H2S in a 500 Wth CLC unit. Fuel, 121, 117-125.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHuang, J., Liu, W., and Yang, Y. (2017). Phase interactions in Mg-Ni-Al-O oxygen carriers for chemical looping applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 326, 470-476.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLyngfelt, A. (2020). Chemical looping combustion: Status and development challenges. Energy and Fuels, 34(8), 9077-9093.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPorrazzo, R., White, G., and Ocone, R. (2014). Aspen Plus simulations of fluidised beds for chemical looping combustion. Fuel, 136, 46-56.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSinghal, A., Cloete, S., Quinta-Ferreira, R., and Amini, S. (2017). Multiscale modeling of a packed bed chemical looping reforming (pbclr) reactor. Energies, 10(12), 2056.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBock, S., Zacharias, R., and Hacker, V. (2020). Co-production of pure hydrogen, carbon dioxide and nitrogen in a 10kW fixed-bed chemical looping system. Sustainable Energy and Fuels, 4(3), 1417-1426.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLiu, M., Li, Y., Wang, X., Gai, Z., Rao, Q., Yang, T., Zhang, J., Tang, S., Pan, Y., and Jin, H. (2024). Synergistic promotions between high purity H2 production and CO2 capture via sorption enhanced chemical looping reforming. Fuel Processing Technology, 254, 108042.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, I., Liu, L., Yu, S., Lai, N. C., Gao, Y., Li, Z., Liu, J., and Wang, W. (2024). Highly sintering-resistant iron oxide with a hetero-oxide shell for chemical looping water splitting. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 57, 438-449.en_US
dc.relation.referencesFarooqui, A., Angal, P., Shamim, T., Santarelli, M., and Mahinpey, N. (2021). Performance assessment of thermochemical CO2/H2O splitting in moving bed and fluidized bed reactors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(58), 29774-29794.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhou, Z., Han, L., and Bollas, G. M. (2014). Overview of chemical-looping reduction in fixed bed and fluidized bed reactors focused on oxygen carrier utilization and reactor efficiency. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14(2), 559-571.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHaider, S. K., Duan, L., Patchigolla, K., and Anthony, E. J. (2016). A hydrodynamic study of a fast‐bed dual circulating fluidized bed for chemical looping combustion. Energy Technology, 4(10), 1254-1262.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhou, K., Jia, J., Li, X., Pang, X., Li, C., Zhou, J., Luo, G., and Wei, F. (2013). Continuous vinyl chloride monomer production by acetylene hydrochlorination on Hg-free bismuth catalyst: From lab-scale catalyst characterization, catalytic evaluation to a pilot-scale trial by circulating regeneration in coupled fluidized beds. Fuel processing technology, 108, 12-18.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHsieh, T. L., Xu, D., Zhang, Y., Nadgouda, S., Wang, D., Chung, C., Pottimurthy, Y., Guo, M., Chen, Y.-Y., Xu, M., He, P., Fan, L.-S., and Tong, A. (2018). 250 kWth high pressure pilot demonstration of the syngas chemical looping system for high purity H2 production with CO2 capture. Applied Energy, 230, 1660-1672.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLan, W., Chen, G., Zhu, X., Wang, X., Liu, C., and Xu, B. (2018). Biomass gasification-gas turbine combustion for power generation system model based on ASPEN PLUS. Science of the total environment, 628, 1278-1286.en_US
dc.relation.referencesDai, X. P., Li, R. J., Yu, C. C., and Hao, Z. P. (2006). Unsteady-state direct partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas in a fixed-bed reactor using AFeO3 (A= La, Nd, Eu) perovskite-type oxides as oxygen storage. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 110(45), 22525-22531.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMoretti, L., Arpino, F., Cortellessa, G., Di Fraia, S., Di Palma, M., and Vanoli, L. (2021). Reliability of equilibrium gasification models for selected biomass types and compositions: An overview. Energies, 15(1), 61.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMutlu, Ö. Ç., and Zeng, T. (2020). Challenges and opportunities of modeling biomass gasification in Aspen Plus: A review. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 43(9), 1674-1689.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRydén, M., and Ramos, P. (2012). H2 production with CO2 capture by sorption enhanced chemical-looping reforming using NiO as oxygen carrier and CaO as CO2 sorbent. Fuel Processing Technology, 96, 27-36.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedrano, J. A., Spallina, V., van Sint Annaland, M., and Gallucci, F. (2014). Thermodynamic analysis of a membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming reactor concept for combined H2 production and CO2 capture. International journal of hydrogen energy, 39(9), 4725-4738.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRydén, M., and Lyngfelt, A. (2006). Using steam reforming to produce hydrogen with carbon dioxide capture by chemical-looping combustion. International journal of hydrogen energy, 31(10), 1271-1283.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKhan, M. N., and Shamim, T. (2016). Investigation of hydrogen generation in a three-reactor chemical looping reforming process. Applied energy, 162, 1186-1194.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKathe, M. V., Empfield, A., Na, J., Blair, E., and Fan, L. S. (2016). Hydrogen production from natural gas using an iron-based chemical looping technology: Thermodynamic simulations and process system analysis. Applied Energy, 165, 183-201.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMeng, W. X., Banerjee, S., Zhang, X., and Agarwal, R. K. (2015). Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus. Energy, 90, 1869-1877.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAntzaras, A. N., Heracleous, E., and Lemonidou, A. A. (2020). Sorption enhanced–chemical looping steam methane reforming: Optimizing the thermal coupling of regeneration in a fixed bed reactor. Fuel Processing Technology, 208, 106513.en_US
dc.relation.referencesFatigati, F., Di Giuliano, A., Carapellucci, R., Gallucci, K., and Cipollone, R. (2021). Experimental characterization and energy performance assessment of a sorption-enhanced steam–methane reforming system. Processes, 9(8), 1440.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, W., and Cao, Y. (2013). A combined thermodynamic and experimental study on chemical‐looping ethanol reforming with carbon dioxide capture for hydrogen generation. International journal of energy research, 37(1), 25-34.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAlam, S., and Sumana, C. (2019). Thermodynamic analysis of plant-wide CLC-SESMR scheme for H2 production: Studying the effect of oxygen carrier supports. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(5), 3250-3263.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHe, Y., Zhu, L., Li, L., and Sun, L. (2019). Zero-energy penalty carbon capture and utilization for liquid fuel and power cogeneration with chemical looping combustion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 34-43.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSurywanshi, G. D., Patnaikuni, V. S., Vooradi, R., and Anne, S. B. (2021). 4-E and life cycle analyses of a supercritical coal direct chemical looping combustion power plant with hydrogen and power co-generation. Energy, 217, 119418.en_US
dc.relation.referencesStenberg, V., Spallina, V., Mattisson, T., and Rydén, M. (2020). Techno-economic analysis of H2 production processes using fluidized bed heat exchangers with steam reforming–Part 1: Oxygen carrier aided combustion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(11), 6059-6081.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSpallina, V., Pandolfo, D., Battistella, A., Romano, M. C., Annaland, M. V. S., and Gallucci, F. (2016). Techno-economic assessment of membrane assisted fluidized bed reactors for pure H2 production with CO2 capture. Energy conversion and management, 120, 257-273.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedrano, J. A., Potdar, I., Melendez, J., Spallina, V., Pacheco-Tanaka, D. A., van Sint Annaland, M., and Gallucci, F. (2018). The membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming concept for efficient H2 production with inherent CO2 capture: Experimental demonstration and model validation. Applied Energy, 215, 75-86.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGupta, S. K., and Mittal, M. (2019). Analysis of cycle-to-cycle combustion variations in a spark-ignition engine operating under various biogas compositions. Energy and Fuels, 33(12), 12421-12430.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPongboriboon, N., Mariyappan, V., Wu, W., and Chandra-Ambhorn, W. (2024). Economic and environmental analyses for achieving net-zero CO2 emissions of a green diesel production process. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 165, 105781.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBilal, B., RaviKumar, M., and Workneh, S. (2018). Study on simulation of biomass gasification for syngas production in a fixed bed reactor. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 4(11), 139-149.en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v10i2.82075en_US


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Chemical Looping Systems for ...
Tamaño:
1.065Mb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem