| dc.contributor.author | GARCIA PARRA, MIGUEL ANGEL | |
| dc.contributor.author | CUELLAR RODRIGUEZ, LUZ ANGELA | |
| dc.contributor.author | BALAGUERA LOPEZ, HELBER ENRIQUE | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Colombia | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-26T13:24:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-26T13:24:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2248-7026 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6116 | |
| dc.description.abstract | El cultivo de quinua ha tomado relevancia durante la última década en diferentes partes del mundo,
debido a su adaptabilidad a condiciones edafoclimáticas difíciles y el gran potencial nutricional con
el que cuentan sus semillas. Sin embargo, los escenarios del cambio climático cada vez son más
adversos, por lo que la búsqueda de estrategias que favorezcan una mayor adaptabilidad de la quinua
a zonas donde otros cultivos no logran adaptarse, es la prioridad científica. Por esta razón, se realizó
una revisión sistemática, utilizando la metodología de elementos de informe preferidos para revisiones
sistemáticas y meta-análisis. Se describe inicialmente la diversidad de hongos que favorecen la
simbiosis y los servicios que ofrecen los hongos micorrízicos arbusculares en la actividad fisiológica de
la planta de quinua, además de su interacción con las condiciones edáficas, principalmente relacionada
con el nitrógeno y el fósforo. Los resultados identificaron una proyección de interés en la investigación
relacionada con la simbiosis entre estos dos organismos pero un avance muy limitado en relación a
estudio que se ha desarrollado en torno a la actividad microbiológica de la quinua en el suelo. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.relation | http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rfnam/v75n1/2248-7026-rfnam-75-01-9853.pdf | en_US |
| dc.title | Simbiosis de micorrizas arbusculares en quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Una revisión sistemática | en_US |
| dc.title.translated | Arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A systematic review | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | 0001518896 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | 0000535834 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | 0000549045 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | mcAAAAJ&hl | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | dAkgt8AAAAJ&hl | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | oa9rs4oAAAAJ&hl | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-8541-5181 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-9573-8344 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-3133-0355 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | Miguel-Garcia-Parra | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | Luz-Cuellar | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | Helber-Balaguera-Lopez | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | 57205122211 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | 55356852000 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | 57208339001 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | The crop of quinoa has gained relevance during the last decade in different parts of the world, due to
its adaptability to difficult edaphic and climatic conditions and the great nutritional potential of its seeds.
However, climate change scenarios are increasingly adverse, so the search for strategies that favor
greater adaptability of quinoa to areas where other crops fail to adapt is a scientific priority. For this
reason, a systematic review was carried out, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-Analysis methodology, with documents published on Scopus and Clarivate Web
of Science databases. This methodology describes the diversity of fungi that favors symbiosis and
the services offered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the physiological activity of the quinoa plant,
in addition to their interaction with the edaphic conditions, mainly related to nitrogen and phosphorus.
The results identified a projection of interest in research related to the symbiosis between these two
organisms, but a very limited advance in relation to the study that has been developed around the
microbiological activity of quinoa in the soil. | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Cultivar Diversidad Microorganismos Nitrógeno Fósforo Fisiología vegetal | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | Cultivar Diversity Microorganisms Nitrogen Phosphorus Plant physiology | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad ciencias agrarias y del ambiente | en_US |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Alarcón A and Ferrera-Cerrato R. 1999. Manejo de la micorriza arbuscular en sistemas de propagación de plantas frutales. Terra Latinoamericana 17(3): 179-191. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Alvarez-Flores R, Winkel T, Nguyen-Thi-Truc A and Joffre R. 2014. Root foraging capacity depends on root system architecture and ontogeny in seedlings of three Andean Chenopodium species. Plant and Soil 380(1): 415-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014- 2105-x | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Alvarez-Flores R, Winkel T, Nguyen-Thi-Truc A and Joffre R. 2014. Root foraging capacity depends on root system architecture and ontogeny in seedlings of three Andean Chenopodium species. Plant and Soil 380(1): 415-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014- 2105-x | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bascuñán-Godoy L, Sanhueza C, Hernández CE, Cifuentes L, Pinto K, Álvarez R and González-Teuber M. 2018a. Nitrogen supply affects photosynthesis and photoprotective attributesduring DroughtInduced Senescence in Quinoa. Frontiers in Plant Science 9(994). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00994 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bascuñán-Godoy L, Sanhueza C, Pinto K, Cifuentes L, Reguera M, Briones V, Zurita-Silva A, Alvarez R and Silva, H. 2018b. Nitrogen physiology of contrasting genotypes of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. (Amaranthaceae). Scientific Reports 8: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-018-34656-5 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bazile D, Bertero HD and Nieto C. 2014. Estado del arte de la quinua en el mundo 2013. FAO, Santiago de Chile and CIRAD, Montpellier, Francia. 724p. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bazile D, Jacobsen SE and Verniau A. 2016. The global expansion of quinoa: Trends and Limits. Frontiers in Plant Science 7: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00622 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Begum N, Qin C, Hanger M, Raza S, Khan MI, Ashraf M, Ahmed N and Zhang L. 2019. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: Implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science 10(1068): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpls.2019.01068 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bender SF, Plantenga F, Neftel A, Jocher M, Oberholzer HR, Köhl L, Giles M, Daniell T and Van Der Heijden MGA. 2014. Symbiotic relationships between soil fungi and plants reduce N2 O emissions from soil. ISME Journal 8(6): 1336-1345. https://doi. org/10.1038/ismej.2013.224 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bosque-Sanchez H, Lemeur R, Van Damme P and Jacobsen SE. 2003. Ecophysiological analysis of drought and salinity stress of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Reviews International 19(1–2): 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1081/FRI-120018874 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Buckland KR, Reeve JR, Creech JE and Durham SL. 2018. Managing soil fertility and health for quinoa production and weed control in organic systems. Soil & Tillage Research 184: 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.07.001 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Cai Z, Wang X, Bhadra S and Gao Q. 2020. Distinct factors drive the assembly of quinoa-associated microbiomes along elevation. Plant and Soil 448: 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019- 04387-1 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Camarena-Gutierrez G. 2012. Interaccion planta-hongos micorrizicos arbusculares. Revista Chapingo, Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente 18(3): 409-421. https://doi.org/10.5154/r. rchscfa.2011.11.093 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Chaudhry M, Batool Z and Khan G. 2005. Preliminary assessment of plant community structure and arbuscular mycorrhizas in rangeland habitats of Cholistan desert, Pakistan. Mycorrhiza 15: 606-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-005-0002-0 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Choukr-Allah R, Rao NK, Hirich A, Shahid M, Alshankiti A, Toderich K, Gill S and Butt K. 2016. Quinoa for marginal environments: Toward future food and nutritional security in MENA and central Asia regions. Frontier | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Chunhua P, Shifang Y, Yongqing Z, Yanhong H, Xiao H and | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Yang Y. 2017. Effects of inoculating arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth of quinoa under different phosphorus levels. Crop 33(6): 131- 139. https://doi.org/10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.06.022 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Escobar A and Zartha JW. 2017. Application of the technology life cycle and S-curves to the “Brain Drain” area of knowledge. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 10(43): 1-8. https://doi. org/10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i43/116247 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Fonseca-López D, Quila-Vivas N and Balaguera-López HE. 2020. Técnicas aplicadas en la investigación agrícola para cuantificar la fijación de nitrógeno: una revisión sistemática. Corpoica Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria 21(e1342): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.21930/ rcta.vol21_num1_art:1342 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-Parra MÁ and Plazas-Leguizamón NZ. 2019. Análisis del ciclo de vida de las publicaciones sobre la producción de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd), a través de curvas en S. Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación 9(2): 379-391. https://doi. org/10.19053/20278306.v9.n2.2019.9189 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-Parra M, Zurita-Silva A, Stechauner-Rohringer R, Roa-Acosta D and Jacobsen SE. 2020a. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and its relationship with agroclimatic characteristics: A Colombian perspective. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 80(2): 290-302. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392020000200290 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-Parra M, Roa-Acosta D, Stechauner-Rohringer R, García-Molano JF, Bazile D and Plazas-Leguizamón N. 2020b. Effect of temperature on the growth and development of quinoa plants (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A review on a global scale. Sylwan 164(5): 411-433 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-Parra M, García-Molano J and Deaquiz-Oyola Y. 2019. Physiological performance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under agricultural climatic conditions in Boyaca, Colombia. Agronomía Colombiana 37(2): 160-168. https://doi.org/10.15446/ agron.colomb.v37n2.76219 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | González JA, Gallardo M, Hilal M, Rosa M and Prado FE. 2009. Physiological responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought and waterlogging stresses: dry matter partitioning. Botanical Studies 50: 35-42 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Harrison MJ, Dewbre GR and Liu J. 2002. A phosphate transporter from Medicago truncatula involved in the acquisition of phosphate released by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. The Plant Cell 14(10): 2413-2429. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.004861 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Isobe K, Aizawa E, Iguchi Y and Ishii R. 2007. Distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in upland field soil of Japan 1. Relationship between spore density and the soil environmental factor. Plant Production Science 10(1): 122–128. https://doi. org/10.1626/pps.10.122 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Jaikishun S, Li W, Yang Z and Song S. 2019. Quinoa : In perspective of global challenges. Agronomy 9(4): 176. https://doi. org/10.3390/agronomy9040176 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Janouskova M, Krak K, Vosatka M, Puschel D and Storchova H. 2017. Inoculation effects on root-colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities spread beyond directly inoculated plants. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0181525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181525 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Kellogg JA, Reganold JP, Murphy KM and Carpenter-Boggs LA. 2021. A Plant-Fungus Bioassay Supports the Classification of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as Inconsistently Mycorrhizal. Microbial Ecology 82: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021- 01710-1quinoa seeds. PeerJ – Life and Environment 14(6): 1-20. https://doi. org/10.7717/peerj.4442 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Renaut S, Daoud R, Masse J, Vialle A and Hijri M. 2020. Inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis does not alter arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure within the roots of corn, wheat, and soybean crops. Microorganisms 8(1): 83. https://doi. org/10.3390/microorganisms8010083 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Rillig MC and Mummey DL. 2006. Mycorrhizas and soil structure. New Phytologist 171(1): 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469- 8137.2006.01750.x | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ruiz KB, Biondi S, Oses R, Acuña-Rodríguez IS, Antognoni F, Martinez-Mosqueira EA, Coulibaly A, Canahua-Murillo A, Pinto M, Zurita-Silva A, Bazile D, Jacobsen SE and Molina-Montenegro, M. A. 2014. Quinoa biodiversity and sustainability for food security under climate change. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34(2): 349-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0195-0 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J, Li H, Bai Z, Chen X, Zhang W and Zhang F. (2011). Phosphorus dynamics: From soil to plant. Plant Physiology 156(3): 997-1005. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175232 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Soudzilovskaia NA, Van Bodegom PM, Terrer C, Zelfde M, McCallum I, Luke-McCormack M, Fisher J, Brundrett M, Cesar de Sa N and Tedersoo L. 2019. Global mycorrhizal plant distribution linked to terrestrial carbon stocks. Nature Communications 10(5077): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13019-2 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Taiz L and Zeiger E. 2006. Fisiología vegetal. Universitat Jaume. 656p. Teste F, Jones MD and Dickie IA. 2020. Dual-mycorrhizal plants: their ecology and relevance. New Phytologist 225: 1835-1851. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16190 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Trouvelot S, Bonneau L, Redecker D, Tuinen D, Van Adrian M and Wipf D. 2015. Arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis in viticulture : A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35: 1449-1467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0329-7 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Urcelay C, Acho J and Joffre R. 2011. Fungal root symbionts and their relationship with fine root proportion in native plants from the Bolivian Andean highlands above 3,700 m elevation. Mycorrhiza 21: 323-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-010-0339-x | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Urrútia G and Bonfill X. 2010. Declaración de PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clinica 135(11): 507-511. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | USDA. 2016. Breeding and agronomy of quinoa for organic farming system. In: https://portal.nifa.usda.gov/web/ crisprojectpages/1010611-breeding-and-agronomy-of-quinoa-fororganic-farming-systems.htm | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Vestberg M, Palojärvi A, Pitkänen T, Kaipainen S, Puolakka E and Keskitalo M. 2012. Neutral lipid fatty acid analysis is a sensitive marker for quantitative estimation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agricultural soil with crops of different mycotrophy. Agricultural and Food Science 21(1): 12-27. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.4996 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Vierheilig H. 2004. Further root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in already mycorrhizal plants is suppressed after a critical level of root colonization. Journal of Plant Physiology 161: and Block AK. 2020. Plant defense chemicals against insect pests. Agronomy 10(1156): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agronomy10081156 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Yepes S, Martínez M, Restrepo S, Palacio JC, Ríos AF and Zartha JW. 2018. Technological Surveillance and technology life cycle analysis - application in food drying. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research 13(10): 7273-7288. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.DOI | 10.15446/rfnam.v75n1.95754 | en_US |
