Show simple item record

MISCELÁNEA GEOGRÁFICA

dc.contributor.authorGARCIA PARRA, MIGUEL ANGEL
dc.contributor.authorPLAZAS LEGUIZAMON, NUBIA ZORAIDA
dc.contributor.authorCOLMENARES CRUZ, RAMIRO ANDRES
dc.contributor.authorJACOME SUAREZ, JELSY MILLENA
dc.contributor.authorCUELLAR RODRIGUEZ, LUZ ANGELA
dc.contributor.authorHERNANDEZ CRIADO, JUAN CARLOS
dc.coverage.spatialPoloniaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-23T14:57:41Z
dc.date.available2026-02-23T14:57:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-12
dc.identifier.issn2084-6118en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6096
dc.description.abstractEl análisis de los medios de vida y el empoderamiento de las comunidades rurales se ha convertido en una de las principales estrategias para caracterizar y estudiar las comunidades rurales, más aún cuando, en diferentes partes del mundo, estas comunidades se ven fuertemente afectadas por las dinámicas políticas y económicas. La investigación busca analizar los medios de vida y el empoderamiento de dos comunidades rurales del departamento de Boyacá, Colombia. Para ello, se seleccionaron dos comunidades, una de los municipios de Ventaquemada y otra de Jericó. Se aplicó un estudio de caso, con información recopilada mediante entrevistas semiestructuradas a 24 unidades familiares. Los resultados permitieron encontrar diferencias significativas en el progreso del desarrollo de los medios de vida, principalmente asociado al capital natural. Además, fue posible distinguir características diferenciales entre las dos áreas de estudio, asociadas al entorno social, económico y físico, lo que determinó el grado de empoderamiento de los miembros de las unidades familiares al desarrollar una actividad productiva en el sector rural.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relationhttps://reference-global.com/article/10.2478/mgrsd-2023-0013en_US
dc.titleMISCELÁNEA GEOGRÁFICAen_US
dc.title.translatedMISCELLANEA GEOGRAPHICAen_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0001518896en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0000571288en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0001646660en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0000066805en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0000535834en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac0001350784en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarmcAAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarmcAAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarST7fAUAAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarOd4f_IAAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.googlescholardAkgt8AAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarHzR0eHsAAAAJ&hlen_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8541-5181en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8541-5181en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0392-7333en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4591-4047en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9573-8344en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4591-4047en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateMiguel-Garcia-Parraen_US
dc.contributor.researchgateNubia-Plazas-Leguizamonen_US
dc.contributor.researchgateRamiro-Andres-Colmenares-Cruzen_US
dc.contributor.researchgateJelsy-Millena-Jacome-Suarezen_US
dc.contributor.researchgateLuz-Cuellaren_US
dc.contributor.researchgateJuan-Hernández-Criadoen_US
dc.contributor.scopus57205122211en_US
dc.contributor.scopus55356852000en_US
dc.contributor.scopus57731281500en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishThe analysis of the livelihoods and the empowerment of rural communities has become one of the main strategies for characterising and studying rural communities, even more so when, in different parts of the world, these communities are strongly affected by the dynamics of politics and economics. The research aims to analyse the livelihoods and empowerment of two rural communities in the department of Boyacá in Colombia. To this purpose, two communities were chosen, one each from the municipalities of Ventaquemada and Jericó. A case study method was applied, with information being collected through semi-structured interviews with 24 family units. The results allowed significant differences to be found in the progress of the development of livelihoods, which was mainly associated with natural capital. In addition, it was also possible to distinguish differential features between the two study areas, which were associated with the social, economic, and physical environment, and therefore determined the degree of empowerment of family unit members in following a productive vocation in the rural sector.en_US
dc.subject.proposalCapital , dinámica , economía , núcleo familiaren_US
dc.subject.keywordsdynamics , economy , family nucleusen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ciencias agrarias y del ambienteen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesAgudelo-Patiño, T, Poveda-Giraldo, J, Salas-Moreno, M, RengifoMosquera, G & Cardona-Alzate, A. 2023, ‘Potential for Sustainable Production of Natural Colorants in the Tropical Forest: A Biorefinery Case of Annatto Seeds’ Sustainability (Switzerland) vol. 14, no. 4, pp 3079. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su15043079en_US
dc.relation.referencesBerdegué, J, Carriazo, F, Jara, B, Modrego, F & Soloaga, I 2015, ‘Cities, Territories, and Inclusive Growth: Unraveling Urban– Rural Linkages in Chile, Colombia, and Mexico’ World Development vol. 73, pp. 56-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. worlddev.2014.12.013en_US
dc.relation.referencesBlackman, A & Veit, P 2018, ‘Titles amazon indigenous communities cut forest carbon emissions’ Ecological Economics vol. 153, pp. 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2018.06.016en_US
dc.relation.referencesCastellanos-Navarrete, A, de Castro, F & Pacheco, P 2021, ‘The impact of oil palm on rural livelihoods and tropical forest landscapes in Latin America’ Journal of Rural Studies vol. 81, pp. 294-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.047en_US
dc.relation.referencesChambers, R & Conway, G 1992, ‘Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century’ IDS Discussion Paper 296, Brighton: IDS. Available from: https://opendocs. ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/775en_US
dc.relation.referencesCreswell, JW 2017, ‘Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches’. 4 Ed. 488p.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCharlier, S, Caubergs, L, Drory, E, Kittel, F, Staes, V, Ravesloot, S, Malpas, N, Smets, K, Grolet, S & Mula, E 2007, ‘El proceso de empoderamiento de las mujeres’ [The women empowerment process]. Guía metodológica. Grupo de trabajo Género e Indicadores, p. 45en_US
dc.relation.referencesDeClerck, F, EstradaCarmona, N, Garbach, K & MartinezSalinas, A 2015. ‘Biodiversity and ecosystem services of agricultural landscapes: reversing agriculture’s externalities’ In Agroecology for food security and nutrition, pp.140-155en_US
dc.relation.referencesDomínguez, I, Torres-López, W, Restrepo-Tarquino, I, OviedoOcaña, R & Smout, I 2014, ‘Livelihood factors, explaining water consumption in a (de facto) multiple uses water system in Colombia’ Ingeniería y Universidad, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7-25. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.IYU18-1.msfeen_US
dc.relation.referencesEitzinger, A, Läderach, P, Bunn, C, Quiroga, A, Benedikter, A, Pantoja, A, Gordon, G & Michele, B 2012, ‘Implications of a changing climate on food security and smallholders’ livelihoods in Bogotá, Colombia’ Mitigation and Adaptaptation Strategies for Global Change vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9432-0en_US
dc.relation.referencesFranco, IB & Ali, S 2017, ‘Decentralization, corporate community development and resource governance: A comparative analysis of two mining regions in Colombia’ The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 4 no. 1, pp. 111-119. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.12.001en_US
dc.relation.referencesFranco-Valencia, M & Sánchez de Prager, M 2018, ‘Life plan for the Yaguivá indigenous reservation in the municipality of Inza, Cauca, Colombia, from the perspective of agroecology’ Agronomía. Colombia, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 143-151. https:// doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v36n2.71996en_US
dc.relation.referencesGallardo-López, F, Hernández-Chontal, MA, Cisneros-Saguilán, P & Linares-Gabriel, A 2018, ‘Development of the concept of agroecology in Europe: A review’ Sustainability, vol. 10 no 4, p. 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041210en_US
dc.relation.referencesHeilbrunn, S & Lannone, R 2020, ‘From center to periphery and back again: A systematic literature review of refugee entrepreneurship’ Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 18, p. 7658. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187658en_US
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Núñez, HE, Andrade, HJ, Suárez-Salazar, JC, Gutiérrez-García, GA, Trujillo-Trujillo, E & Casanoves, F 2021, ‘Almacenamiento de carbono en sistemas agroforestales en los Llanos Orientales de Colombia’ [Carbon storage in agroforestry systems in the Eastern Plains of Colombia] Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 352-368. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v69i1.42959en_US
dc.relation.referencesHernández-Sampieri, R 2014, ‘Metodología de la investigación’ [Research metodology] Sexta edición. Mc. Graw Hill Education. Interamericana de Editores, S.A. de C.V. México. ISBN 978-1-4562-2396-0en_US
dc.relation.referencesJaka, H & Shava, E 2018, Resilient rural women’s livelihoods for poverty alleviation and economic empowerment in semi-arid regions of Zimbabwe. Jamba. Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 524. https:// doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.524en_US
dc.relation.referencesJezeer, RE, Verweij, PA, Boot, RG, Junginger, M & Santos, MJ 2019, ‘Influence of livelihood assets, experienced shocks and perceived risks on smallholder coffee farming practices in Peru’ Journal of environmental management, vol. 242, pp. 496-506. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvman.2019.04.101en_US
dc.relation.referencesKabeer, N 2002, ‘Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment’ Development and Change, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 435-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125en_US
dc.relation.referencesKmoch, L, Pagella, T, Palm, M & Sinclair, F 2018 ‘Using local agroecological knowledge in climate change adaptation: a study of tree-based options in northern Morocco’ Sustainability (Switzerland) vol. 10, p. 3719. https://doi. org/10.3390/su10103719en_US
dc.relation.referencesLópez, Y, Bedoya, C & Cárdenas, G 2015, ‘Estrategias de adaptación y medios vida de las familias integrantes de la Fundación Consejo Veredal FCV Municipio de Calarcá, Quindío’ [Adaptation strategies and livelihoods of the families members of the FCV Veredal Council Foundation Municipality of Calarcá, Quindío] Revista Luna azul. Vol. 41, pp. 201- 239. https://doi.org/10.17151/luaz.2015.41.12en_US
dc.relation.referencesManlosa, A, Hanspach, J, Schultner, J, Dorresteijn, I & Fischer, J 2019, ‘Livelihood strategies, capital assets, and food security in rural Southwest Ethiopia’ Food Security vol. 11, pp 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-00883-xen_US
dc.relation.referencesMiedema, S, Haardörfer, R, Girard, A & Yount, K 2018, ‘Women’s empowerment in East Africa: Development of a crosscountry comparable measure’ World development, vol. 110, pp. 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.031the context of participatory wildlife management: Examples from indigenous communities in Puerto Nariño, AmazonasColombia’ In Ethnozoology, pp. 497-512. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809913-1.00026-0en_US
dc.relation.referencesVásquez-Carrillo, C & Pleáez-Ossa, M 2021 ‘Insights into the ecology of sea turtles and the fisheries of eastern Guajira from the traditional knowledge of fishermen’ Fisheries Research, vol. 238, pp. 105915. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j. fishres.2021.105915en_US
dc.relation.referencesVasilachis, I 2009, ‘Los fundamentos ontológicos y epistemológicos de la investigación cualitativa’ [The ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative research] Qualitative Social Research, vol. 10 no. 2, pp. 1-26.en_US
dc.relation.referencesVelandia-Silva, C & Diab, M 2023, ‘The cultural landscape of coffee in Tolima, Colombia: heritage assessment, sustainability and management’ Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, vol.13, no. 2, pp. 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2021-0064en_US
dc.relation.referencesMisra, J 2006, ‘Empowerment of women in India’ The Indian Journal of Political Science, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 867-878. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41856270en_US
dc.relation.referencesOchieng, J, Schreinemachers, P, Ogada, M, Dinssa, FF, Barnos, W & Mndiga, H 2019 ‘Adoption of improved amaranth varieties and good agricultural practices in East Africa’ Land use policy, vol. 83, pp. 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landusepol.2019.02.002en_US
dc.relation.referencesOtzen, Y & Manterola, M 2017, ‘Técnicas de Muestreo sobre una Población a Estudio’. International Journal of Morphology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 227-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717- 95022017000100037en_US
dc.relation.referencesPaa-Kwesi, S 2019 ‘Ghana’s livelihood empowerment against poverty (LEAP) programme is leaking: Irregularities watering down the impact of the flagship LEAP programme’ Cogent social sciences, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1627789. https://doi.org/10. 1080/23311886.2019.1627789en_US
dc.relation.referencesPlazas-Leguizamón, N & García-Parra, M 2017, ‘Empoderamiento de las comunidades rurales a través de la proyección social del conocimiento científico’ [Empowerment of rural communities through the social projection of scientific knowledge]Cultura Científica, vol. 15, pp, 124-133.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPrebisch, R 2016. ‘The economic development of Latin America’. ECLAC Thinking, Selected Texts (1948-1998). Santiago: ECLAC, pp. 45-84.en_US
dc.relation.referencesScoones, I 2009, ‘Livelihoods perspectives and rural development’ The Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 36 no. 1, pp. 171-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820503en_US
dc.relation.referencesSharaunga, S & Mudhara, M 2016, ‘Dimensions of Empowerment Influencing Women in KwaZulu-Natal to diversify away from agricultural-based livelihoods’ Agrekon, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2016. 1159586en_US
dc.relation.referencesShuai, Y, Shuai, C, Li, W & Huang, F 2019, ‘Role of women’s empowerment in improving farmer’s livelihood: empirical evidence from China’ Quality and Quantity, vol. 53, pp. 621- 639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0778-6en_US
dc.relation.referencesStake, R. (1999). ‘Investigación con estudio de casos’ [Research with case studies]. Segunda edición. Ediciones Morata S.L. Madrid. Available from: https://www.uv.mx/rmipe/ files/2017/02/Investigacion-con-estudios-de-caso.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesSuarez, A. 2021. ‘Contribución de los capitales de la comunidad sobre el bienestar de las familias cafeteras en el sur de Colombia’ [Contribution of community capital to the wellbeing of coffee-growing families in southern Colombia]. Doctorate Thesis, Doctorado en Ciencias Naturales y Desarrollo sustentable. Universidad de la Amazonía. 143p. Available from:en_US
dc.relation.referencesSulemana, M, Malongza, BFI & Abdulai, M 2019, ‘Assessment of the livelihood empowerment against poverty programme in Karaga district, Ghana’. Development in Practice, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2018. 1551859en_US
dc.relation.referencesTatis-Diaz, R, Pinto-Osorio, D, Medina-Hernández, E, MorenoPallares, M, Canales, F, Corrales-Paternina, A & EcheverríaGonzalez, A 2022, ‘Socioeconomic determinants that influence the agricultural practices of small farm families in northern Colombia’ Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 21, no. 7, 440-451. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jssas.2021.12.001en_US
dc.relation.referencesTorres-Guevara, L. 2002, ‘Autoconsumo y reciprocidad entre los campesinos andinos: caso Fómeque’ [Self-consumption and reciprocity among Andean farmers: Fómeque case] Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, vol. 48, 80 – 98.en_US
dc.relation.referencesvan Vliet, N, L’haridon, L, Gomez, J, Vanegas, L, Sandrin, F & Nasi, R 2018, ‘The use of traditional ecological knowledge inen_US
dc.relation.referencesVelázquez, P & Aguilar, O 2012, ‘La felicidad como elemento del desarrollo sostenible desde la organización’ [Happiness as an element of sustainable development from the organization] Revista del Centro de Investigación, vol. 10, no. 37, pp. 83-94.en_US
dc.relation.referencesYang, B, Feldman, M & Li, S 2021, ‘The status of family resilience: effects of sustainable livelihoods in rural China’ Social indicators Research, vol. 153, pp. 1041-1064.en_US
dc.identifier.DOI10.2478/mgrsden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Analysis_of_the_livelihoods_an ...
Size:
617.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Articulo principal
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record