| dc.contributor.author | GARCIA PARRA, MIGUEL ANGEL | |
| dc.contributor.author | ROA ACOSTA, DIEGO FERNANDO | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Zuiza | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-23T14:13:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-02-23T14:13:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 5 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2571-581X | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6095 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Fondo:El consumo de quinua ha representado un desafío para productores y procesadores de alimentos. Necesitan estudiar nuevos cultivares y las propiedades funcionales de las harinas de quinua.Métodos:Las propiedades estructurales y reológicas de seis cultivares de quinua (Titicaca, Blanca real, Soracá, Pasankalla, Puno y Nariño) cultivados a diferentes altitudes se estudiaron mediante espectroscopia infrarroja por transformada de Fourier (FTIR) y pruebas oscilatorias dinámicas. Los espectros FTIR revelaron diferencias en las estructuras de proteínas y almidón entre los cultivares, que podrían estar relacionadas con su adaptación a diferentes condiciones ambientales. El análisis reológico mostró que los geles de quinua exhibieron un comportamiento viscoelástico, con un predominio del componente elástico (G') sobre el componente viscoso (G”). El rango de viscoelasticidad lineal se determinó aplicando una prueba de barrido de deformación (0,001–100%) a una frecuencia constante de 5 Hz. La prueba de barrido de frecuencia (0,01–100 Hz) a una amplitud de deformación constante de 0,1% dentro del régimen lineal se utilizó para obtener el módulo de almacenamiento (G'), el módulo de pérdida (G”) y la viscosidad compleja (η*).Resultados:El modelo de Burgers se ajustó a los datos experimentales y se obtuvieron los cuatro parámetros (η 1 , η 2 , R 1 y R 2 ) para cada cultivar. Los resultados mostraron que el cultivar, la altitud y su interacción tuvieron efectos significativos en las propiedades reológicas de los geles de quinua. Los cultivares cultivados a mayor altitud tendieron a tener valores de G', G”, y η* más altos que los cultivados a menor altitud, lo que indica una red de gel más fuerte. Los cultivares también difirieron en sus tiempos de relajación, siendo Titicaca y Blanca real los que tuvieron los tiempos más cortos y más largos, respectivamente. Estas diferencias podrían atribuirse a las variaciones en las estructuras de proteínas y almidón de las harinas de quinua, así como a las propiedades de absorción de agua y gelificación de los cultivares.Conclusión:El comportamiento viscoelástico de los geles se ve influenciado por la conformación estructural de sus componentes, como las proteínas y el almidón. Estos componentes aportan rigidez y elasticidad a los geles. La conformación estructural puede variar en función de las condiciones ambientales y las características fenotípicas de los componentes. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.relation | https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1222277/full | en_US |
| dc.title | FRONTERAS EN SISTEMAS ALIMENTARIOS SOSTENIBLES | en_US |
| dc.title.translated | FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | 0000440540 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | 0001430632 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | mcAAAAJ&hl | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | DwAAAAJ&hl | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-8541-5181 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-7198-9827 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | Miguel-Garcia-Parra | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | Diego-Fernando-Roa-Acosta | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | 57205122211 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | 55579905600 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | Background: Quinoa consumption has created a challenge for producers and food processors. They need to study new cultivars and the functional properties of quinoa flours.Methods: The structural and rheological properties of six quinoa cultivars (Titicaca, Blanca real, Soracá, Pasankalla, Puno and Nariño) grown at different altitudes were studied using Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and dynamic oscillatory tests. The FTIR spectra revealed differences in the protein and starch structures among the cultivars, which could be related to their adaptation to different environmental conditions. The rheological analysis showed that the quinoa gels exhibited viscoelastic behavior, with a predominance of the elastic component (G’) over the viscous component (G”). The linear viscoelasticity range was determined by applying a strain sweep test (0.001–100%) at a constant frequency of 5 Hz. The frequency sweep test (0.01–100 Hz) at a constant strain amplitude of 0.1% within the linear regime was used to obtain the storage modulus (G’), the loss modulus (G”) and the complex viscosity (η*).Results: The Burgers model was fitted to the experimental data, and the four parameters (η1, η2, R1, and R2) were obtained for each cultivar. The results showed that the cultivar., the altitude and their interaction had significant effects on the rheological properties of the quinoa gels. The cultivars grown at higher altitudes tended to have higher G’, G”, and η* values than those grown at lower altitudes, indicating a stronger gel network. The cultivars also differed in their relaxation times, with Titicaca and Blanca real having the shortest and longest times, respectively. These differences could be attributed to the variations in the protein and starch structures of the quinoa flours, as well as the water absorption and gelation properties of the cultivars.Conclusion: The viscoelastic behavior of gels is influenced by the structural conformation of their components, such as proteins and starch. These components provide stiffness and elasticity to the gels. The structural conformation can change depending on the environmental conditions and the phenotypic characteristics of the components. | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Quinua | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | Quinoa | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad ciencias agrarias y del ambiente | en_US |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | AshfaqA.ClochardM. C.CoqueretC.DispenzaC.DriscollM. S.UlańskiP.et al. (2020). Polymerization reactions and modifications of polymers by ionizing radiation. Polymers12:2877. doi: 10.3390/polym12122877 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | BockstaeleF.LeynI.EeckhoutM.DewettinckK. (2011). Non-linear creep-recovery measurements as a tool for evaluating the viscoelastic properties of wheat flour dough. J. Food Eng.107, 50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.06.001 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Contreras-JiménezB.Torres-VargasO. L.Rodríguez-GarcíaM. E. (2019). Physicochemical characterization of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) flour and isolated starch. Food Chem.298:124982. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.124982 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | FelixM.Camacho-OcañaZ.López-CastejónM. L.Ruiz-DomínguezM. (2021). Rheological properties of quinoa-based gels. An alternative for vegan diets. Food Hydrocoll.120:106827. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106827 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | FonsecaL. M.HalalS. L. M.Guerra-DíasA. R.Rosa-ZavarezeE. (2021). Physical modification of starch by heat-moisture treatment and annealing and their applications: a review. Carbohydr. Polym.274:118665. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118665 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-ParraM. Á.Polo-MuñozM. P.Nieto-CalvacheJ. E.Agudelo-LaverdeL. M.Roa-AcostaD. F. (2022a). Physicochemical, rheological and structural properties of flours from six quinoa cultivars grown in Colombia. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.6. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.936962 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Garcia-ParraM. Á.Roa-AcostaD. F.Bravo-GomezJ. E.Hernández-CriadoJ. C.Villada-CastilloH. S. (2022b). Effects of altitudinal gradient on physicochemical and rheological potential of quinoa cultivars. Front. Sustain.6:862238. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.862238 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-ParraM.Roa-AcostaD.Bravo-GómezJ. E. (2022c). Effect of the altitude gradient on the physiological performance of quinoa in the central region of Colombia. Agronomy (Basel, Switzerland).12:2112. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12092112 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-ParraM. Á.Roa-AcostaD. F.García-LondoñoV.Moreno-MedinaB.Bravo-GómezJ. E. (2021). Structural characterization and antioxidant capacity of quinoa cultivars using techniques of FT-MIR and UHPLC/ESI-Orbitrap MS spectroscopy. Plan. Theory10:1. doi: 10.3390/plants10102159 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-SalcedoA. J.Torres-VargasO. L.Del RealA.Contreras-JiménezB.Rodríguez-GarcíaM. E. (2018). Pasting, viscoelastic, and physicochemical properties of chia (Salvia hispanica L.) flour and mucilage. Food Struct.16, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.foostr.2018.03.004 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Garcia-ValleD. E.Agama-AcevedoE.Del Carmen NúñezS. M.Alvarez-RamirezJ.Bello-PérezL. A. (2021). Extrusion pregelatinization improves texture, viscoelasticity and in vitro starch digestibility of mango and amaranth flours. J. Funct. Foods80:104441. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104441 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | HuangR.HuangK.GuanX.LiS.CaoH.ZhangY.et al. (2021). Effect of defatting and extruding treatment on the physicochemical and storage properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) flour. LWT147:111612. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111612 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | KontogiorgosV. (2017). Linear viscoelasticity of gluten: decoupling of relaxation mechanisms. J. Cereal Sci.75, 286–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2017.04.001 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | KumarP.KaurC.RudraS. G.AroraB. (2023). Extruded finger millet improves rheology and quality of composite maize flatbread. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci.31:100638. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100638 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | LesjakJ.CalderiniD. F. (2017). Increased night temperature negatively affects grain yield, biomass and grain number in Chilean quinoa. Front. Plant Sci.8:352. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00352 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | MirandaM.Vega-GálvezA.MartínezE.LópezJ.MarínR.ArandaM.et al. (2013). Influence of contrasting environments on seed composition of two quinoa genotypes: nutritional and functional properties. Chil. J. Agric. Res.73, 108–116. doi: 10.4067/S071858392013000200004 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Muñoz-PabonK. S.Parra-PolancoA. S.Roa-AcostaD. F.Hoyos-ConchaJ. L.Bravo-GómezJ. E. (2022). Physical and paste properties comparison of four snacks produced by high protein quinoa flour extrusion cooking. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.6:2224. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.852224 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ortiz-GómezV.Nieto-CalvacheJ. E.Roa-AcostaD. F.Solanilla-DuqueJ. F.Bravo-GómezJ. E. (2022). Preliminary characterization of structural and rheological behavior of the quinoa Hyperprotein-defatted flour. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.6:2332. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2022.852332 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | RanalliN.AndrésS.CalifanoA. N. (2012). Physicochemical and rheological characterization of “dulce de leche”. J. Texture Stud.43, 115–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2011.00321.x | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Roa-AcostaD. F.Bravo-GómezJ. E.Solanilla-DuqueJ. F.Zuñiga-GalindezJ. Z.Martínez-CruzJ. A. (2022). Antioxidant potential of extruded snacks enriched with hyper-protein quinoa flour and vegetable extracts. Food Sci. Technol.42:74621. doi: 10.1590/fst.74621 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Roa-AcostaD. F.BueraM. P.TolabaM. P.SantagapitaP. R. (2017). Encapsulation and stabilization of β-carotene in Amaranth matrices obtained by dry and wet assisted ball milling. Food Bioprocess Technol.10, 512–521. doi: 10.1007/s11947-016-1830-y | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Roa-AcostaD. F.Solanilla-DuqueJ. F.Agudelo-LaverdeL. M.VilladaH. S.TolabaM. P. (2020). Structural and thermal properties of the amaranth starch granule obtained by high-impact wet milling. Int. J. Food Eng.16. doi: 10.1515/ijfe-2020-0024 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Rodríguez-GómezM. J.PrietoJ. M.Crúz-SobradoV.Calvo-MagroP. (2021). Nutritional characterization of six quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) varieties cultivated in southern Europe. J. Food Compos. Anal.99:103876. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103876 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | SanzT.SalvadorA.HernándezM. (2023). Creep–recovery and oscillatory rheology of flour-based systems. Adv. Food Rheol. Appl.459-478. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823983-4.00019-4 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | SanzT.SalvadorA.HernándezM. (2023). Creep–recovery and oscillatory rheology of flour-based systems. Adv. Food Rheol. Appl.459-478. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-823983-4.00019-4 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | SelakovićA.NikolićI.DokićL.Šoronja-SimovićD.ŠimurinaO.ZáhorecJ.et al. (2021). Enhancing rheological performance of laminated dough with whole wheat flour by vital gluten addition. LWT138:110604. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110604 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | ShangJ.ZhaoB.LiuC.LiL.HongJ.LiuM.et al. (2023). Impact of wheat starch granule size on viscoelastic behaviors of noodle dough sheet and the underlying mechanism. Food Hydrocoll.134:108111. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108111 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | ShresthaS.HagL.HaritosV.DhitalS. (2023). Rheological and textural properties of heat-induced gels from pulse protein isolates: lentil, mungbean and yellow pea. Food Hydrocoll.143:108904. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108904 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | SongY.ZhengQ. (2007). Dynamic rheological properties of wheat flour dough and proteins. Trends Food Sci. Technol.18, 132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2006.11.003 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | SunX.KokselF.NickersonM. T.ScanlonM. J. (2020). Modeling the viscoelastic behavior of wheat flour dough prepared from a wide range of formulations. Food Hydrocoll.98:105129. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.05.030 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | SunX.PeiF.FangY. (2022). The effects of hydrocolloids on the thermomechanical, viscoelastic and microstructural properties of whole wheat flour dough. Food Chem.370:130976. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130976 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | WangY.GuoJ.WangC.LiY.BaiZ.LuoD.et al. (2023). Effects of konjac glucomannan and freezing on thermal properties, rheology, digestibility and microstructure of starch isolated from wheat dough. Food Sci. Technol.177:114588. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114588 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | WuY.YeG.LiX.WangL.LiuY.TanB.et al. (2022). Comparison of quality characteristics of six reconstituted whole wheat flour with different modified bran. LWT153:112543. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112543 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | YanW.ZhangM.ZhangM.YadavM. P.JiaX.YinL. (2022). Effect of wheat bran arabinoxylan on the gelatinization and long-term retrogradation behavior of wheat starch. Carbohydr. Polym.291:119581. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119581 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | YangH.YangS.KongJ.DongA.YuS. (2015). Obtaining information about protein secondary structures in aqueous solution using Fourier transform IR spectroscopy. Nat. Protoc.10, 382–396. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.024 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | YangL.YangL.LoweR. L. (2021). A viscoelasticity model for polymers: time, temperature, and hydrostatic pressure dependent young's modulus and poisson's ratio across transition temperatures and pressures157:103830. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103839, | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | YangC.ZhongF.Douglas GoffH.LiY. (2019). Study on starch-protein interactions and their effects on physicochemical and digestible properties of the blends. Food Chem.280, 51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.028 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | YinX.ZhengY.KongX.CaoS.ChenS.LiuD.et al. (2021). RG- І pectin affects the physicochemical properties and digestibility of potato starch. Food Hydrocoll.117:106687. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106687 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | YuJ.WangY.LiD.WangL. J. (2022). Freeze-thaw stability and rheological properties of soy protein isolate emulsion gels induced by NaCl. Food Hydrocoll.123:107113. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107113 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.DOI | 10.3389/fsufs | en_US |