Show simple item record

Sistemas de ciclo químico para la producción de hidrógeno y su implementación en el software Aspen Plus: una revisión y análisis bibliométrico

dc.contributor.authorVanegas Trujillo, Esteban
dc.contributor.authorLuna Del Risco, Mario Alberto
dc.contributor.authorRocha Meneses, Lisandra
dc.contributor.authorArrieta Gonzáles, Carlos Ernesto
dc.contributor.authorSierra Del Rio, Jorge Andrés
dc.contributor.authorYepes Tumay, Hernando Alexander
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-11T20:38:20Z
dc.date.available2025-11-11T20:38:20Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-01
dc.identifier.issn2528-1410en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/6050
dc.description.abstractLa producción de hidrógeno (H₂) es una estrategia clave para reducir las emisiones de gases de efecto invernadero, ya que proporciona una alternativa energética limpia y eficiente. Esta revisión explora la combustión en bucle químico (CLC) para la producción de H₂, centrándose en las materias primas, los portadores de oxígeno (OC) y el modelado de procesos en Aspen Plus®. Se realizó un análisis bibliométrico para respaldar la revisión. Los resultados indican que el metano (CH₄) supera a la biomasa debido a su mayor eficiencia y comportamiento de reacción estable. Los óxidos a base de hierro y níquel son los OC más eficaces, ya que el hierro facilita la división del agua y el níquel destaca en la reformulación del metano con vapor (SMR) y la reformulación por bucle químico (CLR). La mejora de los OC con materiales de apoyo y sorbentes mejora el rendimiento del sistema. Las simulaciones precisas utilizando modelos Rgibbs y de lecho fluidizado son esenciales para optimizar el proceso. Este estudio proporciona información para mejorar la eficiencia de la producción de H₂, lo que contribuye al avance de las tecnologías de energía limpia.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relationhttps://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/ijost/article/view/82075en_US
dc.titleSistemas de ciclo químico para la producción de hidrógeno y su implementación en el software Aspen Plus: una revisión y análisis bibliométricoen_US
dc.title.translatedChemical looping systems for hydrogen production and their implementation in Aspen Plus software: A review and bibliometric analysisen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacEsteban Vanegas Trujillo [0002041870]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacMario Alberto Luna Del Risco [0001453589]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacCarlos Ernesto Arrieta González [0001435094]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacJorge Andrés Sierra Del Rio [0001635778]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay [0001229087]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarEsteban Vanegas Trujillo [EsndSVgAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarMario Alberto Luna Del Risco [J76rfbcAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarLisandra Rocha Meneses [Sl0Kp7MAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarCarlos Ernesto Arrieta González [NLn9xE8AAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarJorge Andrés Sierra Del Rio [EA1YwD8AAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay [sev_U34AAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidEsteban Vanegas Trujillo [0000-0003-3687-7667]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidMario Alberto Luna Del Risco[0000-0002-4679-2125]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidLisandra Rocha Meneses [0000-0003-1196-9522]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidCarlos Ernesto Arrieta González [0000-0003-0839-6102]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidJorge Andrés Sierra Del Rio [0000-0002-0057-7454]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay [0000-0001-9399-5673]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateCarlos Ernesto Arrieta González [Carlos-Arrieta-2]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay [Hernando-Yepes]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusEsteban Vanegas Trujillo [59341468400]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusMario Alberto Luna Del Risco[59341468400]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusLisandra Rocha Meneses [57194285359]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusCarlos Ernesto Arrieta González [57194285359]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusJorge Andrés Sierra Del Rio [57209529989]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusHernando Alexander Yepes Tumay [55675200900]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishHydrogen (H₂) production is a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, providing a clean and efficient energy alternative. This review explores chemical looping combustion (CLC) for H₂ production, focusing on feedstocks, oxygen carriers (OCs), and process modeling in Aspen Plus®. A bibliometric analysis was conducted to support the review. Results indicate that methane (CH₄) outperforms biomass due to its higher efficiency and stable reaction behavior. Iron- and nickel-based oxides are the most effective OCs, with iron facilitating water splitting and nickel excelling in steam methane reforming (SMR) and chemical looping reforming (CLR). Enhancing OCs with support materials and sorbents improves system performance. Accurate simulations using Rgibbs and fluidized bed models are essential for optimizing the process. This study provides insights into improving H₂ production efficiency, contributing to advancements in clean energy technologies.en_US
dc.subject.proposalAspen plusen_US
dc.subject.proposalCircuito químicoen_US
dc.subject.proposalCaptura de CO₂en_US
dc.subject.proposalMateria primaen_US
dc.subject.proposalHidrógenoen_US
dc.subject.proposalTransportador de oxígenoen_US
dc.subject.keywordsAspen plusen_US
dc.subject.keywordsChemical loopingen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCO2 captureen_US
dc.subject.keywordsFeedstocken_US
dc.subject.keywordsHydrogenen_US
dc.subject.keywordsOxygen carrieren_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, B. M., Hansen, J., Rioux, J., Stirling, C. M., Twomlow, S., and Eva (Lini) Wollenberg. (2018). Urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts (SDG 13): Transforming agriculture and food systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34, 13-20.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRamezani, R., Di Felice, L., and Gallucci, F. (2023). A review of chemical looping reforming technologies for hydrogen production: Recent advances and future challenges. Journal of Physics: Energy, 5(2), 024010.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLi, J., Zhang, H., Gao, Z., Fu, J., Ao, W., and Dai, J. (2017). CO2 capture with chemical looping combustion of gaseous fuels: An overview. Energy and Fuels, 31(4), 3475 3524.en_US
dc.relation.referencesJacobson, T. A., Kler, J. S., Hernke, M. T., Braun, R. K., Meyer, K. C., and Funk, W. E. (2019). Direct human health risks of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nature Sustainability, 2(8), 691-701.en_US
dc.relation.referencesStoppacher, B., Sterniczky, T., Bock, S., and Hacker, V. (2022). On-site production of high-purity hydrogen from raw biogas with fixed-bed chemical looping. Energy Conversion and Management, 268, 115971.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLuo, M., Yi, Y., Wang, S., Wang, Z., Du, M., Pan, J., and Wang, Q. (2018). Review of hydrogen production using chemical-looping technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 3186-3214.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBanerjee, S., and Agarwal, R. (2015). Transient reacting flow simulation of spouted fluidized bed for coal-direct chemical looping combustion with different Fe-based oxygen carriers. Applied Energy, 160, 552-560.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAlirezaei, I., Hafizi, A., and Rahimpour, M. R. (2018). Syngas production in chemical looping reforming process over ZrO2 promoted Mn-based catalyst. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 23, 105-116.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHossain, M. M., and de Lasa, H. I. (2008). Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—a review. Chemical Engineering Science, 63(18), 4433 4451.en_US
dc.relation.referencesIdziak, K., Czakiert, T., Krzywanski, J., Zylka, A., Kozlowska, M., and Nowak, W. (2020). Safety and environmental reasons for the use of Ni-, Co-, Cu-, Mn-and Fe-based oxygen carriers in CLC/CLOU applications: An overview. Fuel, 268, 117245.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAbuelgasim, S., Wang, W., and Abdalazeez, A. (2021). A brief review for chemical looping combustion as a promising CO2 capture technology: Fundamentals and progress. Science of The Total Environment, 764, 142892.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, B., Li, H., Wang, W., Luo, C., and Mei, D. (2020). Chemical looping combustion of lignite with the CaSO4–CoO mixed oxygen carrier. Journal of the Energy Institute, 93(3), 1229-1241.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZheng, M., Shen, L., and Feng, X. (2014). In situ gasification chemical looping combustion of a coal using the binary oxygen carrier natural anhydrite ore and natural iron ore. Energy conversion and management, 83, 270-283.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, B., Guo, C., Xu, B., Li, X., Ma, J., Ji, J., Mei, D., and Zhao, H. (2021). Synergistic reaction investigation of the NiO modified CaSO4 oxygen carrier with lignite for simultaneous CO2 capture and SO2 removal. Fuel Processing Technology, 220, 106895.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSong, T., Zheng, M., Shen, L., Zhang, T., Niu, X., and Xiao, J. (2013). Mechanism investigation of enhancing reaction performance with CaSO4/Fe2O3 oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion of coal. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(11), 4059-4071.en_US
dc.relation.referencesDi, Z., Yang, F., Cao, Y., Zhang, K., Guo, Y., Gao, S., and Cheng, F. (2019). The transformation pathways on the catalytic and stability-promoted CaSO4 reduction in CLC process using Fe2O3 supported. Fuel, 253, 327-338.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHeidari, M., Tahmasebpoor, M., Antzaras, A., and Lemonidou, A. A. (2020). CO2 capture and fluidity performance of CaO-based sorbents: Effect of Zr, Al and Ce additives in tri-, bi-and mono-metallic configurations. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 144, 349-365.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhu, L., Li, L., and Fan, J. (2015). A modified process for overcoming the drawbacks of conventional steam methane reforming for hydrogen production: Thermodynamic investigation. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 104, 792-806.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGanesh, I. (2013). A review on magnesium aluminate (MgAl2O4) spinel: Synthesis, processing and applications. International Materials Reviews, 58(2), 63-112.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHafizi, A., and Rahimpour, M. R. (2018). Inhibiting Fe–Al spinel formation on a narrowed mesopore-sized MgAl2O4 support as a novel catalyst for H2 production in chemical looping technology. Catalysts, 8(1), 27.en_US
dc.relation.referencesNascimento, R. A., Medeiros, R. L., Costa, T. R., Oliveira, Â. A., Macedo, H. P., Melo, M. A., and Melo, D. M. (2020). Mn/MgAl 2 O 4 oxygen carriers for chemical looping combustion using coal: Influence of the thermal treatment on the structure and reactivity. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 140, 2673-2685.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCabello, A., Dueso, C., García-Labiano, F., Gayán, P., Abad, A., De Diego, L. F., and Adánez, J. (2014). Performance of a highly reactive impregnated Fe2O3/Al2O3 oxygen carrier with CH4 and H2S in a 500 Wth CLC unit. Fuel, 121, 117-125.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHuang, J., Liu, W., and Yang, Y. (2017). Phase interactions in Mg-Ni-Al-O oxygen carriers for chemical looping applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 326, 470-476.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLyngfelt, A. (2020). Chemical looping combustion: Status and development challenges. Energy and Fuels, 34(8), 9077-9093.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPorrazzo, R., White, G., and Ocone, R. (2014). Aspen Plus simulations of fluidised beds for chemical looping combustion. Fuel, 136, 46-56.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSinghal, A., Cloete, S., Quinta-Ferreira, R., and Amini, S. (2017). Multiscale modeling of a packed bed chemical looping reforming (pbclr) reactor. Energies, 10(12), 2056.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBock, S., Zacharias, R., and Hacker, V. (2020). Co-production of pure hydrogen, carbon dioxide and nitrogen in a 10kW fixed-bed chemical looping system. Sustainable Energy and Fuels, 4(3), 1417-1426.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLiu, M., Li, Y., Wang, X., Gai, Z., Rao, Q., Yang, T., Zhang, J., Tang, S., Pan, Y., and Jin, H. (2024). Synergistic promotions between high purity H2 production and CO2 capture via sorption enhanced chemical looping reforming. Fuel Processing Technology, 254, 108042.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, I., Liu, L., Yu, S., Lai, N. C., Gao, Y., Li, Z., Liu, J., and Wang, W. (2024). Highly sintering-resistant iron oxide with a hetero-oxide shell for chemical looping water splitting. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 57, 438-449.en_US
dc.relation.referencesFarooqui, A., Angal, P., Shamim, T., Santarelli, M., and Mahinpey, N. (2021). Performance assessment of thermochemical CO2/H2O splitting in moving bed and fluidized bed reactors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(58), 29774 29794.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhou, Z., Han, L., and Bollas, G. M. (2014). Overview of chemical-looping reduction in fixed bed and fluidized bed reactors focused on oxygen carrier utilization and reactor efficiency. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14(2), 559-571.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHaider, S. K., Duan, L., Patchigolla, K., and Anthony, E. J. (2016). A hydrodynamic study of a fast‐bed dual circulating fluidized bed for chemical looping combustion. Energy Technology, 4(10), 1254-1262.en_US
dc.relation.referencesZhou, K., Jia, J., Li, X., Pang, X., Li, C., Zhou, J., Luo, G., and Wei, F. (2013). Continuous vinyl chloride monomer production by acetylene hydrochlorination on Hg-free bismuth catalyst: From lab-scale catalyst characterization, catalytic evaluation to a pilot-scale trial by circulating regeneration in coupled fluidized beds. Fuel processing technology, 108, 12-18.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHsieh, T. L., Xu, D., Zhang, Y., Nadgouda, S., Wang, D., Chung, C., Pottimurthy, Y., Guo, M., Chen, Y.-Y., Xu, M., He, P., Fan, L.-S., and Tong, A. (2018). 250 kWth high pressure pilot demonstration of the syngas chemical looping system for high purity H2 production with CO2 capture. Applied Energy, 230, 1660-1672.en_US
dc.relation.referencesLan, W., Chen, G., Zhu, X., Wang, X., Liu, C., and Xu, B. (2018). Biomass gasification-gas turbine combustion for power generation system model based on ASPEN PLUS. Science of the total environment, 628, 1278-1286.en_US
dc.relation.referencesDai, X. P., Li, R. J., Yu, C. C., and Hao, Z. P. (2006). Unsteady-state direct partial oxidation of methane to synthesis gas in a fixed-bed reactor using AFeO3 (A= La, Nd, Eu) perovskite-type oxides as oxygen storage. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 110(45), 22525-22531.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMoretti, L., Arpino, F., Cortellessa, G., Di Fraia, S., Di Palma, M., and Vanoli, L. (2021). Reliability of equilibrium gasification models for selected biomass types and compositions: An overview. Energies, 15(1), 61.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMutlu, Ö. Ç., and Zeng, T. (2020). Challenges and opportunities of modeling biomass gasification in Aspen Plus: A review. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 43(9), 1674-1689.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRydén, M., and Ramos, P. (2012). H2 production with CO2 capture by sorption enhanced chemical-looping reforming using NiO as oxygen carrier and CaO as CO2 sorbent. Fuel Processing Technology, 96, 27-36.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedrano, J. A., Spallina, V., van Sint Annaland, M., and Gallucci, F. (2014). Thermodynamic analysis of a membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming reactor concept for combined H2 production and CO2 capture. International journal of hydrogen energy, 39(9), 4725-4738.en_US
dc.relation.referencesRydén, M., and Lyngfelt, A. (2006). Using steam reforming to produce hydrogen with carbon dioxide capture by chemical-looping combustion. International journal of hydrogen energy, 31(10), 1271-1283.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKhan, M. N., and Shamim, T. (2016). Investigation of hydrogen generation in a three reactor chemical looping reforming process. Applied energy, 162, 1186-1194.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKathe, M. V., Empfield, A., Na, J., Blair, E., and Fan, L. S. (2016). Hydrogen production from natural gas using an iron-based chemical looping technology: Thermodynamic simulations and process system analysis. Applied Energy, 165, 183-201.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMeng, W. X., Banerjee, S., Zhang, X., and Agarwal, R. K. (2015). Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus. Energy, 90, 1869-1877.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAntzaras, A. N., Heracleous, E., and Lemonidou, A. A. (2020). Sorption enhanced chemical looping steam methane reforming: Optimizing the thermal coupling of regeneration in a fixed bed reactor. Fuel Processing Technology, 208, 106513.en_US
dc.relation.referencesFatigati, F., Di Giuliano, A., Carapellucci, R., Gallucci, K., and Cipollone, R. (2021). Experimental characterization and energy performance assessment of a sorption enhanced steam–methane reforming system. Processes, 9(8), 1440.en_US
dc.relation.referencesWang, W., and Cao, Y. (2013). A combined thermodynamic and experimental study on chemical‐looping ethanol reforming with carbon dioxide capture for hydrogen generation. International journal of energy research, 37(1), 25-34.en_US
dc.relation.referencesAlam, S., and Sumana, C. (2019). Thermodynamic analysis of plant-wide CLC-SESMR scheme for H2 production: Studying the effect of oxygen carrier supports. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(5), 3250-3263.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHe, Y., Zhu, L., Li, L., and Sun, L. (2019). Zero-energy penalty carbon capture and utilization for liquid fuel and power cogeneration with chemical looping combustion. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 34-43.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSurywanshi, G. D., Patnaikuni, V. S., Vooradi, R., and Anne, S. B. (2021). 4-E and life cycle analyses of a supercritical coal direct chemical looping combustion power plant with hydrogen and power co-generation. Energy, 217, 119418.en_US
dc.relation.referencesStenberg, V., Spallina, V., Mattisson, T., and Rydén, M. (2020). Techno-economic analysis of H2 production processes using fluidized bed heat exchangers with steam reforming–Part 1: Oxygen carrier aided combustion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(11), 6059-6081.en_US
dc.relation.referencesSpallina, V., Pandolfo, D., Battistella, A., Romano, M. C., Annaland, M. V. S., and Gallucci, F. (2016). Techno-economic assessment of membrane assisted fluidized bed reactors for pure H2 production with CO2 capture. Energy conversion and management, 120, 257-273.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMedrano, J. A., Potdar, I., Melendez, J., Spallina, V., Pacheco-Tanaka, D. A., van Sint Annaland, M., and Gallucci, F. (2018). The membrane-assisted chemical looping reforming concept for efficient H2 production with inherent CO2 capture: Experimental demonstration and model validation. Applied Energy, 215, 75-86.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGupta, S. K., and Mittal, M. (2019). Analysis of cycle-to-cycle combustion variations in a spark-ignition engine operating under various biogas compositions. Energy and Fuels, 33(12), 12421-12430.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPongboriboon, N., Mariyappan, V., Wu, W., and Chandra-Ambhorn, W. (2024). Economic and environmental analyses for achieving net-zero CO2 emissions of a green diesel production process. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 165, 105781.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBilal, B., RaviKumar, M., and Workneh, S. (2018). Study on simulation of biomass gasification for syngas production in a fixed bed reactor. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 4(11), 139-149.en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v10i2.82075en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Sistemas de ciclo químico para ...
Size:
1.065Mb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record