Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlvarez Pacheco, Cristhian Enrique
dc.contributor.authorEspinel Blanco, Edwin
dc.contributor.authorNoriega Sánchez, Carlos Javier
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-15T20:58:34Z
dc.date.available2025-10-15T20:58:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-29
dc.identifier.issn2311-5521en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5757
dc.description.abstractEste trabajo presenta la simulación de un generador de vapor o caldera acuotubular mediante la implementación en MATLAB® de un modelo matemático propuesto. Se presentan balances de masa y energía para los tres componentes principales de la caldera: el tambor, los tubos ascendentes y descendentes. Se estudiaron tres soluciones alternativas a la ecuación diferencial ordinaria (EDO), basadas en el método de Runge-Kutta de cuarto orden, el método de Heun y la función Ode45 de MATLAB. Los mejores resultados se obtuvieron utilizando la función Ode45 de MATLAB® basada en el método de Runge-Kutta de cuarto orden. El error fue inferior al 5 % para la simulación de la presión de vapor en el tambor, el volumen total de agua en la caldera y la calidad de la mezcla, en relación con lo reportado.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relationhttps://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/6/5/175en_US
dc.titleEstudio de diferentes alternativas para la simulación dinámica de un generador de vapor utilizando MATLABen_US
dc.title.translatedStudy of Different Alternatives for Dynamic Simulation of a Steam Generator Using MATLABen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacCristhian Enrique Alvarez Pacheco [0000138453]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacEdwin Espinel Blanco [0001200917]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacCarlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [0000005913]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarCristhian Enrique Alvarez Pacheco [sKtc1OgAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarEdwin Espinel Blanco [3ODKG4cAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarCarlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [g9XJPNwAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidCristhian Enrique Álvarez Pacheco [0000-0003-4062-0311]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidEdwin Espinel Blanco [0000-0003-4479-2874]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidCarlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [0000-0002-7782-8119]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateEdwin Espinel Blanco [57209774810]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateCarlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [Carlos-Noriega-Sanchez]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusEdwin Espinel Blanco [57209774810]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusCarlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [57197858501]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishThis work presents the simulation of a steam generator or water-tube boiler through the implementation in MATLAB® for a proposed mathematical model. Mass and energy balances for the three main components of the boiler—the drum, the riser and down-comer tubes—are presented. Three alternative solutions to the ordinary differential equation (ODE) were studied, based on Runge– Kutta 4th order method, Heun’s method, and MATLAB function Ode45. The best results were obtained using MATLAB® function Ode45 based on the Runge–Kutta 4th Order Method. The error was less than 5% for the simulation of the steam pressure in the drum, the total volume of water in the boiler, and the mixture quality in relation to what was reported.en_US
dc.subject.proposalgenerador de vaporen_US
dc.subject.proposalmodelo matemáticoen_US
dc.subject.proposaltamboren_US
dc.subject.proposaltubo ascendenteen_US
dc.subject.proposaltubo descendenteen_US
dc.subject.keywordssteam generatoren_US
dc.subject.keywordsmathematical modelen_US
dc.subject.keywordsdrumen_US
dc.subject.keywordsriseren_US
dc.subject.keywordsdown-comeren_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesInternational Energy Agency IEA. The Global Authority on Energy. 2018, Volume 12, p. 8. Available online: https://www.iea.org (accessed on 10 October 2020).en_US
dc.relation.referencesNordell, B. Thermal pollution causes global warming. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2003, 38, 305–312. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesSunil, P.; Barve, J.; Nataraj, P. Mathematical modeling, simulation and validation of a boiler drum: Some investigations. Energy 2017, 126, 312–325. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesButler, R.M. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen; Prentice Hall: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1991.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHaagen, M.; Zahler, C.; Zimmermann, E.; Al-Najami, M.M.R. Solar Process Steam for Pharmaceutical Industry in Jordan. Energy Procedia 2015, 70, 621–625. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAström, K.; Bell, R. Drum-boiler dynamics. Automatica 2000, 36, 363–378. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesÄström, K.J.; Bell, R.D. Simple drum-boiler models. Power Syst. Model. Control Appl. 1988. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAdam, E.; Marchetti, J. Dynamic simulation of large boilers with natural recirculation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1999, 23, 1031–1040. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesBhambare, K.; Miltra, S. Modeling of a Coal-Fired Natural Circulation Boiler. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2007, 129, 159–167. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesTaimoor, A.; Alghamdi, M.; Farooqi, O.; Siddiqui, M.; Zain-ul-abdein, M.; Saleem, W.; Ijaz, H.; Ali, A. Comprehensive Dynamic Modeling, Simulation, and Validation for an Industrial Boiler Incident Investigation. Process Saf. Prog. 2019, 38, e12040. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesTaimoor, A.; Alghamdi, M.; Farooqi, O.; Siddiqui, M.; Zain-ul-abdein, M.; Saleem, W.; Ijaz, H.; Ali, A. Comprehensive Dynamic Modeling, Simulation, and Validation for an Industrial Boiler Incident Investigation. Process Saf. Prog. 2019, 38, e12040. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesGonzález, P.; Gómez, J.; Ferruzza, D.; Haglind, F.; Santana, D. Dynamic performance and stress analysis of the steam generator of parabolic trough solar power plants. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 147, 804–818. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesKeshavar, O.; Jafarian, A.; Shekafti, M. Dynamic simulation of a heat recovery steam generator dedicated to a brine concentration plant. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2018, 135, 1763–1773. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesAhmed, S.; Elhosseini, M.; Arafat Ali, H. Modelling and practical studying of heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) drum dynamics and approach point effect on control valves. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2018, 9, 3187–3196. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesHuan, L.; Weide, H. A water level dynamics simulation model of AP1000’s steam generator based on Åström-Bell model. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 310. [CrossRef]en_US
dc.relation.referencesGriffiths, D.V.; Smith, I.M. Numerical methods for engineers. In Numerical Methods for Engineers, 2nd ed.; Mcgraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2006.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCaiza, W. Métodos Numéricos; Prentice Hall: Madrid, Spain, 2015.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMathWorks. Documentation: MATLAB. 2015. Available online: https://la.mathworks.com/ (accessed on 10 October 2020).en_US
dc.relation.referencesMezo, J. Encuestas y Margen de Error: Unaguíapráctica. 2015. Available online: http://www.cuadernosdeperiodistas.com/ encuestas-y-margen-de-error-una-guia-practica/ (accessed on 10 October 2020).en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6050175en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record