| dc.contributor.author | Alvarez Pacheco, Cristhian Enrique | |
| dc.contributor.author | Espinel Blanco, Edwin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Noriega Sánchez, Carlos Javier | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Colombia | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-15T20:58:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-15T20:58:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-04-29 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2311-5521 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5757 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Este trabajo presenta la simulación de un generador de vapor o caldera acuotubular mediante la implementación en MATLAB® de un modelo matemático propuesto. Se presentan balances de masa y energía para los tres componentes principales de la caldera: el tambor, los tubos ascendentes y descendentes. Se estudiaron tres soluciones alternativas a la ecuación diferencial ordinaria (EDO), basadas en el método de Runge-Kutta de cuarto orden, el método de Heun y la función Ode45 de MATLAB. Los mejores resultados se obtuvieron utilizando la función Ode45 de MATLAB® basada en el método de Runge-Kutta de cuarto orden. El error fue inferior al 5 % para la simulación de la presión de vapor en el tambor, el volumen total de agua en la caldera y la calidad de la mezcla, en relación con lo reportado. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.relation | https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/6/5/175 | en_US |
| dc.title | Estudio de diferentes alternativas para la simulación dinámica de un generador de vapor utilizando MATLAB | en_US |
| dc.title.translated | Study of Different Alternatives for Dynamic Simulation of a Steam Generator Using MATLAB | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | Cristhian Enrique Alvarez Pacheco [0000138453] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | Edwin Espinel Blanco [0001200917] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | Carlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [0000005913] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | Cristhian Enrique Alvarez Pacheco [sKtc1OgAAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | Edwin Espinel Blanco [3ODKG4cAAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | Carlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [g9XJPNwAAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Cristhian Enrique Álvarez Pacheco [0000-0003-4062-0311] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Edwin Espinel Blanco [0000-0003-4479-2874] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Carlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [0000-0002-7782-8119] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | Edwin Espinel Blanco [57209774810] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | Carlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [Carlos-Noriega-Sanchez] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | Edwin Espinel Blanco [57209774810] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | Carlos Javier Noriega Sánchez [57197858501] | en_US |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | This work presents the simulation of a steam generator or water-tube boiler through the
implementation in MATLAB® for a proposed mathematical model. Mass and energy balances for the
three main components of the boiler—the drum, the riser and down-comer tubes—are presented.
Three alternative solutions to the ordinary differential equation (ODE) were studied, based on Runge–
Kutta 4th order method, Heun’s method, and MATLAB function Ode45. The best results were
obtained using MATLAB® function Ode45 based on the Runge–Kutta 4th Order Method. The error
was less than 5% for the simulation of the steam pressure in the drum, the total volume of water in
the boiler, and the mixture quality in relation to what was reported. | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | generador de vapor | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | modelo matemático | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | tambor | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | tubo ascendente | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | tubo descendente | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | steam generator | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | mathematical model | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | drum | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | riser | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | down-comer | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad ingenierías | en_US |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | International Energy Agency IEA. The Global Authority on Energy. 2018, Volume 12, p. 8. Available online: https://www.iea.org (accessed on 10 October 2020). | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Nordell, B. Thermal pollution causes global warming. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2003, 38, 305–312. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Sunil, P.; Barve, J.; Nataraj, P. Mathematical modeling, simulation and validation of a boiler drum: Some investigations. Energy 2017, 126, 312–325. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Butler, R.M. Thermal Recovery of Oil and Bitumen; Prentice Hall: Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1991. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Haagen, M.; Zahler, C.; Zimmermann, E.; Al-Najami, M.M.R. Solar Process Steam for Pharmaceutical Industry in Jordan. Energy Procedia 2015, 70, 621–625. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Aström, K.; Bell, R. Drum-boiler dynamics. Automatica 2000, 36, 363–378. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Äström, K.J.; Bell, R.D. Simple drum-boiler models. Power Syst. Model. Control Appl. 1988. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Adam, E.; Marchetti, J. Dynamic simulation of large boilers with natural recirculation. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1999, 23, 1031–1040. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bhambare, K.; Miltra, S. Modeling of a Coal-Fired Natural Circulation Boiler. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2007, 129, 159–167. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Taimoor, A.; Alghamdi, M.; Farooqi, O.; Siddiqui, M.; Zain-ul-abdein, M.; Saleem, W.; Ijaz, H.; Ali, A. Comprehensive Dynamic Modeling, Simulation, and Validation for an Industrial Boiler Incident Investigation. Process Saf. Prog. 2019, 38, e12040. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Taimoor, A.; Alghamdi, M.; Farooqi, O.; Siddiqui, M.; Zain-ul-abdein, M.; Saleem, W.; Ijaz, H.; Ali, A. Comprehensive Dynamic Modeling, Simulation, and Validation for an Industrial Boiler Incident Investigation. Process Saf. Prog. 2019, 38, e12040. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | González, P.; Gómez, J.; Ferruzza, D.; Haglind, F.; Santana, D. Dynamic performance and stress analysis of the steam generator of parabolic trough solar power plants. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 147, 804–818. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Keshavar, O.; Jafarian, A.; Shekafti, M. Dynamic simulation of a heat recovery steam generator dedicated to a brine concentration plant. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2018, 135, 1763–1773. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ahmed, S.; Elhosseini, M.; Arafat Ali, H. Modelling and practical studying of heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) drum dynamics and approach point effect on control valves. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2018, 9, 3187–3196. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Huan, L.; Weide, H. A water level dynamics simulation model of AP1000’s steam generator based on Åström-Bell model. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 310. [CrossRef] | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Griffiths, D.V.; Smith, I.M. Numerical methods for engineers. In Numerical Methods for Engineers, 2nd ed.; Mcgraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2006. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Caiza, W. Métodos Numéricos; Prentice Hall: Madrid, Spain, 2015. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | MathWorks. Documentation: MATLAB. 2015. Available online: https://la.mathworks.com/ (accessed on 10 October 2020). | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Mezo, J. Encuestas y Margen de Error: Unaguíapráctica. 2015. Available online: http://www.cuadernosdeperiodistas.com/ encuestas-y-margen-de-error-una-guia-practica/ (accessed on 10 October 2020). | en_US |
| dc.identifier.DOI | https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6050175 | en_US |