Show simple item record

IoT aplicado a sistemas de riego en agricultura: Un análisis de usabilidad

dc.contributor.authorRomero Riaño, Efrén
dc.contributor.authorGaleano Barrera, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorMartinez Toro, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorRico Bautista, Dewar
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero, Cesar D
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T15:36:42Z
dc.date.available2025-10-09T15:36:42Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-21
dc.identifier.issn2539-2115en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5703
dc.description.abstractEl Internet de las Cosas favorece el aprovechamiento de las herramientas tecnológicas en ambientes rurales, gracias a la capacidad de conexión a Internet entre dispositivos que facilita el quehacerdiario. El objetivo de la investigación es evaluar la usabilidad del sistema de soporte para la toma de decisiones de riego en el agro, AgroRIEGO, que se tiene desde el desarrollo de una aplicación de un dispositivo basado en IoT. El patrocinador de este proyecto fue el Ministerio de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación y el Centro de Excelencia de Apropiación en Internet de las Cosas (CEA-IoT) en Colombia. Dentro de los métodos usados se encuentra el uso de la técnica de evaluación heurística, estructurada en 15 categorías y 62 subcategorías de valoración. Este análisis se complementa con el aporte de un grupo de expertos en el diseño y desarrollo de aplicaciones y dispositivos IoT y el agro para valorar los atributos del sistemaen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unab.edu.co/index.php/rcc/article/view/4483en_US
dc.titleIoT aplicado a sistemas de riego en agricultura: Un análisis de usabilidaden_US
dc.title.translatedIoT applied to irrigation systems in agriculture: A usability analysisen_US
dc.contributor.cvlacEfrén Romero Riaño [0001423333]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacClaudia Galeano Barrera [0001463163]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacMauricio Martinez Toro [0001489133]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlacDewar Rico Bautista [0000255815]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarClaudia Galeano Barrera [VZE20kQAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarCesar D. Guerrero [_YgBOOcAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarMauricio Martinez Toro [NKXdCogAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholarDewar Rico Bautista [q_ZtKjsAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidEfrén Romero Riaño [0000-0002-3627-9942]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidClaudia Galeano Barrera [0000-0002-3794-7041]en_US
dc.contributor.orcidDewar Rico Bautista [0000-0002-1808-3874]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateEfrén Romero Riaño [Efren-Riano]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateCesar D. Guerrero [Cesar-Guerrero-2]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgateDewar Rico Bautista [Dewar-Rico-Bautista]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusEfrén Romero Riaño [57205706551]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusClaudia Galeano Barrera [57205700219]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusCesar D. Guerrero [23094317500]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusMauricio Martinez Toro [57205705742]en_US
dc.contributor.scopusDewar Rico Bautista [58689228900]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishThe Internet of Things favors using technological tools in rural environments thanks to the ability to connect to the Internet between devices that facilitate daily tasks. The research aims to evaluate the usability of the decision support systemfor irrigation in agriculture, AgroRIEGO,through the development of an IoT-based device. The sponsors of this project were the Ministry of Information and Communication Technologies and the Center of Excellence in the Internet of Things Appropriation (CEA-IoT) in Colombia. Among the methods used is the use of the heuristic evaluation technique, structured into 15 categories and 62 subcategories of assessment. This analysis was complemented by the contribution of a group of experts in the design and development of IoT applications and devices and agriculture to assess the system's attributes.en_US
dc.subject.proposalEvaluación heurísticaen_US
dc.subject.proposalEvaluación de usabilidaden_US
dc.subject.proposalInterfaz de Usuarioen_US
dc.subject.proposalSistemas de soporte a la toma de decisionesen_US
dc.subject.proposalInternet de las Cosasen_US
dc.subject.proposalSistemas de irrigaciónen_US
dc.subject.keywordsHeuristic evaluationen_US
dc.subject.keywordsUsability testingen_US
dc.subject.keywordsUser interfaceen_US
dc.subject.keywordsDecision Support Systemsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsIoTen_US
dc.subject.keywordsIrrigation systemsen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ingenieríasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesAgarwal, R., & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a firm’s Web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.168.84en_US
dc.relation.referencesBailey, D. R., Owen, J. S., Wagner, J., & Selker, J. S. (2013). In-situ performance and usability of a distributed, wireless sensor network via mesh connectivity at a production container nursery. Applied engineering in agriculture, 29(5), 779–782.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBastien, J. M. C. (2010). Usability testing: a review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(4), e18–e23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.12.004en_US
dc.relation.referencesBlanck, P. (2014). Equality the struggle for web accessibility by persons with cognitive disabilities. In Equality the Struggle for Web Accessibility by Persons with Cognitive Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107280151en_US
dc.relation.referencesBright, L. F., Kleiser, S. B., & Grau, S. L. (2015). Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.048en_US
dc.relation.referencesCaro, D, Romero-Riaño, E., Espinosa, A., & Guerrero, C. D. (2020). Evaluating usability contributions in ICT-IOT solutions for agriculture: A bibliometric perspective. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 2020(E28), 681–692.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCorneanu, C. A., Simón, M. O., Cohn, J. F., & Guerrero, S. E. (2016). Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38(8), 1548–1568. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2515606en_US
dc.relation.referencesD’mello, S. K., & Kory, J. (2015). A Review and Meta-Analysis of Multimodal Affect Detection Systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 47(3), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2682899en_US
dc.relation.referencesFlandoli, A. M. B., & Romero-Riaño, E. (2020). The Role of Gamification in the Environmental Awareness: A Bibliometric Review Intellectual Structure Evolution. In Prisma Social (Issue 30).en_US
dc.relation.referencesGarmer, K., Liljegren, E., Osvalder, A. L., & Dahlman, S. (2002). Application of usability testing to the development of medical equipment. Usability testing of a frequently used infusion pump and a new user interface for an infusion pump developed with a human factors approach. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 29(3), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00060-9en_US
dc.relation.referencesGil-Quintana, J., Santoveña-Casal, S., & Riaño, E. R. (2021). Realfooders influencers on instagram: From followers to consumers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041624en_US
dc.relation.referencesGranollers, T. (2018). Usability Evaluation with Heuristics. New Proposal from Integrating Two Trusted Sources 2 Combining Common Heuristic Sets. 1–16.en_US
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero, C. D., & Rico-Bautista, D. (2020). Center for excellence and internet acquisition of things: A commitment to competitiveness from alliances between government, academia and productive sector. RISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 2020(E28), 615–628.en_US
dc.relation.referencesHornbæk, K. (2006). Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64(2), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002en_US
dc.relation.referencesHuggins, J. E., Guger, C., Ziat, M., Zander, T. O., Taylor, D., Tangermann, M., Soria-Frisch, A., Simeral, J., Scherer, R., Rupp, R., Ruffini, G., Robinson, D. K. R., Ramsey, N. F., Nijholt, A., Mueller-Putzo, G., McFarland, D. J., Mattia, D., Lancer, B. J., Kindermans, P.-J., … Aarnoutse, E. J. (2017). Workshops of the Sixth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: braincomputer interfaces past, present, and future. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 4(1–2, SI), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1275488en_US
dc.relation.referencesNielsen, J. (1994). Usability Engineering.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKantner, L., & Rossenabum, S. (1997). Usability Studies of WWW Sites:Heuristic Evaluation vs. Laboratory Testing. ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS 2010.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKowalczewska, K., & Turnhout, E. (2012). The Usability of Scenario Studies: the Case of the EUruralis from the Users’ Perspective. Polish Sociological Review, 177, 91–105.en_US
dc.relation.referencesMaguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 55(4), 587–634. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0503en_US
dc.relation.referencesMartinez-Toro, G. M., Ariza-Zabala, G. C., Rico-Bautista, D., & Romero-Riaño, E. (2019). Human computer interaction in transport, a systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1409, 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1409/1/012002en_US
dc.relation.referencesMcIntire, J. P., Havig, P. R., & Geiselman, E. E. (2014). Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: A comprehensive review. Displays, 35(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2013.10.004en_US
dc.relation.referencesParra Valencia, J. A., Guerrero, C. D., & Rico-Bautista, D. (2017). IOT: una aproximación desde ciudad inteligente a universidad inteligente. Revista Ingenio, 13(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.22463/2011642X.2128en_US
dc.relation.referencesRau, P. L. P., & Liang, S. F. M. (2003). Internationalization and localization: Evaluating and testing a Website for Asian users. Ergonomics, 46(1–3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130303527en_US
dc.relation.referencesRautaray, S. S., & Agrawal, A. (2012). Vision based hand gesture recognition for human computer interaction: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 43(1), 1–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-012-9356-9en_US
dc.relation.referencesRico-Bautista, D., Collazos, C. A., Guerrero, C. D., Maestre-Gongora, G., & Medina-Cárdenas, Y. (2021). Latin American Smart University: Key Factors for a User-Centered Smart Technology Adoption Model. In Sustainable Intelligent Systems (pp. 161–173). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4901-8_10en_US
dc.relation.referencesRico-Bautista, D., Maestre-Gongora, G., & Guerrero, C. D. (2020). Smart University:IoT adoption model. 2020 Fourth World Conference on Smart Trends in Systems, Security and Sustainability (WorldS4), 821–826. https://doi.org/10.1109/WorldS450073.2020.9210369en_US
dc.relation.referencesRico-Bautista, D., Medina-Cárdenas, Y., & Guerrero, C. D. (2019). Smart University: A Review from the Educational and Technological View of Internet of Things. In P. M., F. C., & R. A. (Eds.), International Conference on Information Technology and Systems, ICITS 2019 (Vol. 918, pp. 427–440). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11890-7_42en_US
dc.relation.referencesRomero-Riaño, E., Guerrero-Santander, C. D., & Martínez-Ardila, H. E. (2021). Agronomy research co-authorship networks in agricultural innovation systems. Revista UIS Ingenierías, 20(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v20n1-2021015en_US
dc.relation.referencesSeufert, M., Egger, S., Slanina, M., Zinner, T., Hossfeld, T., & Tran-gia, P. (2015). A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming. Ieee Communication Surveys & Tutorials, 17(1), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2014.2360940en_US
dc.relation.referencesTurk, M. (2014). Multimodal interaction: A review. Pattern Recognition Letters, 36(1), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2013.07.003en_US
dc.relation.referencesWaytz, A., Heafner, J., & Epley, N. (2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.29375/25392115.4483en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
IoT aplicado a sistemas de riego ...
Size:
288.2Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record