| dc.contributor.author | Gallardo Amaya, Romel Jesús | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cely Calixto, Nelson Javier | |
| dc.contributor.author | Zafra Mejía, Carlos Alfonso | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Colombia | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-25T13:47:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-25T13:47:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-03-13 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5608 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Contextualización: el sector de la construcción cada día está innovando en la postulación y creación de nuevos proyectos responsables con el ambiente, a fin de mitigar las alteraciones negativas producidas por los procesos que se llevan a
cabo en la elaboración y levantamiento de estructuras.
Vacío de conocimiento: por esta razón, el campo de esta investigación tiene como objetivo describir la triada de la sostenibilidad en la gestión de los proyectos de
construcción, que conllevan un resultado exitoso de un proyecto industrial sostenible.
Propósito: El trabajo tiene como propósito fundamental la incorporación de los enfoques de economía, ambiente y sociedad a las prácticas conocidas de la gestión
de proyectos de obras civiles.
Metodología: la metodología empleada en el presente manuscrito fue cualitativa y se aplicó el análisis documental descriptivo correlacional, para identificar y analizar los indicadores de mayor importancia en la gestión de proyectos constructivos con un enfoque de sostenibilidad. La investigación permitió distinguir un considerable número de indicadores clave que se utilizan en el argot actual y que podrían implementarse en los nuevos proyectos con el propósito de buscar sinergias holísticas que mitiguen la incertidumbre de las metas propuestas.
Resultados y conclusiones: como resultado se obtuvo la identificación y categorización de los factores de medición con el
propósito de facilitar la conceptualización y consideración en las prácticas de sostenibilidad para los gerentes de proyecto. Con este estudio se contribuye al mapeo de oportunidades de mejora en la sostenibilidad de los proyectos constructivos a partir de la gestión de indicadores, y se resalta la pertinencia de la gestión sostenible para la industria de la construcción. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | spa | en_US |
| dc.relation | https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/617879194.pdf | en_US |
| dc.title | La gestión de los proyectos constructivos mediante una visión holística de la sostenibilidad | en_US |
| dc.title.translated | Construction project management through a holistic view of sustainability | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | Romel Jesús Gallardo Amaya [0000883590] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | Nelson Javier Cely Calixto [0001636110] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | Carlos Alfonso Zafra Mejía [0000884065] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | Romel Jesús Gallardo Amaya [kCbpxb4AAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | Nelson Javier Cely Calixto [8ocDkoMAAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | Carlos Alfonso Zafra Mejía [tBWNg2QAAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Romel Jesús Gallardo Amaya [0000-0002-4740-4841] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Nelson Javier Cely Calixto [0000-0002-2083-6978] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Carlos Alfonso Zafra Mejía [0000-0002-4061-4897] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | Nelson Javier Cely Calixto [N-Cely-Calixto] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | Carlos Alfonso Zafra Mejía [Carlos-Zafra-Mejia] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | Nelson Javier Cely Calixto [57220922255] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | Carlos Alfonso Zafra Mejía [24402391800] | en_US |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | Contextualization: the construction sector is innovating every day in the postulation and creation of new environ mentally responsible projects, to mitigate the negative alterations produced by the processes carried out in the elaboration and erection of structures.
Knowledge gap: for this reason, the field of this research aims to describe the triad of sustainability in the management of construction projects, leading to a suc cessful outcome of a sustainable indus trial project.
Purpose: the fundamental purpose of the work is to incorporate the economic, environmental, and social approaches to the known practices of civil works project management.
Methodology: the methodology used in this manuscript was qualitative and des criptive correlational documentary analy sis was applied to identify and analyze the most important indicators in the manage ment of construction projects with a focus on sustainability. The research allowed distinguishing a considerable number of key indicators that are used in the current jargon and that could be implemented in new projects with the purpose of seeking holistic synergies that mitigate the uncer tainty of the proposed goals.
Results and conclusions: as a result of this study, measurement factors were
identified and categorized in order to fa cilitate the conceptualization and conside ration of sustainability practices for pro ject managers. This study contributes to the mapping of opportunities for impro vement in the sustainability of construction projects based on the management of indicators and highlights the relevance of sustainable management for the construc tion industry | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | gestión de proyectos constructivos | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Indicadores de sostenibilidad | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | triada de la sostenibilidad | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | Enfoque holístico de la construcción | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | construction project mana gement | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | holistic approach to construction | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | sustainability indicators | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | sustainability triad | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad ingenierías | en_US |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Adelina, D., and Roxana, S. (2016). Indica dores económico-financieros-vectores de desempeño presupuestario. Estu dio de caso Rumania. Procedia Economía y Finanzas, 39, 833–839. https://doi. org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30262-3 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Akhimien, N. G., Latif, E., and Hou, S. S. (2021). Application of circular economy principles in buildings: A systematic review. Journal of Building Engineering, 38(102041), 102041. https://doi.or g/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102041 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Altamirano-Ávila, A., and Martínez, M. (2021). Evaluación de la sostenibili dad urbana de cinco ciudades latinoa mericanas mediante el uso del índice SDEWES. Revista de Producción más Limpia, 287(125495), 125495. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125495 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Al Dakheel, J., Del Pero, C., Aste, N., and Leonforte, F. (2020). Smart buildings feature and key performance indica tors: A review. Sustainable Cities and So ciety, 61(102328), 102328. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102328 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ali, B., Hedayati-Dezfooli, M. y Gamil, A. (2023). Evaluación de la sostenibilidad de las vías de generación de energía de energía alternativa a través del desa rrollo de indicadores de impacto para el agua, la tierra, las emisiones de GEI y el costo. Revisiones de energía renovable y sostenible, 171(113030), 113030. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113030 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Araújo, A. G., Pereira Carneiro, A. M., and Palha, R. P. (2020). Sustainable construction management: A systema tic review of the literature with me ta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Produc tion, 256(120350), 120350. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120350 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Asnaashari, E. (2011). A holistic conceptual model for managing construction logistics in building projects: the case of Iran. ht tps://www.semanticscholar.org/pa per/9d44652e9e00cf7f9f16d2589bde- 13b7ff22e2fb. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Baduge, S. K., Thilakarathna, S., Perera, J. S., Arashpour, M., Sharafi, P., Teodosio, B., Shringi, A., and Mendis, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and smart vision for building and construction 4.0: Ma chine and deep learning methods and applications. Automation in Construc tion, 141(104440), 104440. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104440 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Braulio-Gonzalo, M., Jorge-Ortiz, A., and Bovea, MD (2022). ¿Cómo abordan los indicadores de los sistemas de clasifica ción de edificios ecológicos las dimen siones de la sostenibilidad y los marcos del ciclo de vida en los edificios residen ciales? Revisión de evaluación de impacto ambiental, 95(106793), 106793. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106793 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Custodio, H. M., Hadjikakou, M., and Bryan, B. A. (2023). A review of socioe conomic indicators of sustainability and well-being building on the social foundation’s framework. Ecological Economics: The Journal of the Interna tional Society for Ecological Economics, 203(107608), 107608. https://doi.or g/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107608 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Chen, T., Fu, M., Liu, R., Xu, X., Zhou, S., and Liu, B. (2019). How do project ma nagement competencies change within the project management career model in large Chinese construction compa nies? International Journal of Project Ma nagement, 37(3), 485–500. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.12.002 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (CEPAL). (2018). La Agenda 2030 y los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sos tenible. Una oportunidad para Améri ca Latina y el Caribe CEPAL. https:// repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/hand le/11362/40155/24/S1801141_es.pdf. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Domínguez, E., Pérez, B., Rubio, Á. L., and Zapata, M. A. (2019). A taxonomy for key performance indicators manage ment. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 64, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. csi.2018.12.001 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | D’Inverno, G., Carosi, L., and Romano, G. (2021). Environmental sustainabi lity and service quality beyond eco nomic and financial indicators: A per formance evaluation of Italian water utilities. Socio-Economic Planning Scien ces, 75(100852), 100852. https://doi.or g/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100852 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Faris, N., Lee, Y.-S., Meadows, M., Smelt zer, M., Ray, M., Ward, K., Fehnel, C., Houston-Harris, C., and Osarogiag bon, R. (2017). P1.01-021 The impact of smoking status on overall survival in a population-based non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) surgical resec tion cohort. Journal of thoracic oncolo gy: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 12(1), S461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jtho.2016.11.545 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Goel, A., Ganesh, L. S., and Kaur, A. (2019). Sustainability integration in the management of construction pro jects: A morphological analysis of over two decades’ research literature. Jour nal of Cleaner Production, 236(117676), 117676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle pro.2019.117676 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Gholipour, H. F., Arjomandi, A., and Yam, S. (2022). Green property finance and CO2 emissions in the building indus try. Global Finance Journal, 51(100696), 100696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gfj.2021.100696. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | He, W., Liu, P., Lin, B., Zhou, H., and Chen, X. (2022). Green finance support for the development of green buildings in Chi na: Effect, mechanism, and policy im plications. Energy Policy, 165(112973), 112973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enpol.2022.112973 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Hicks, B., Culley, S., Gopsill, J., and Snider, C. (2020). Managing complex enginee ring projects: What can we learn from the evolving digital footprint? Inter national Journal of Information Manage ment, 51(102016), 102016. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.10.001 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Kamari, A., and Kirkegaard. (2020). An integrated building design methodo logy based on systems thinking for reaching sustainability. Education and Digital Theory-Ethics, Cybernetics, Feed back, Theory, 1(38). ecaade2020_036.pdf (cumincad.org) | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Kim, C.-J., Kim, J., Hong, T., Koo, C., Jeong, K., and Park, H. S. (2015). A pro gram-level management system for the life cycle environmental and eco nomic assessment of complex building projects. Environmental impact assess ment review, 54, 9–21. https://doi.or g/10.1016/j.eiar.2015.04.005 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Lima, L., Trindade, E., Alencar, L., Alen car, M., and Silva, L. (2021). Sustainabi lity in the construction industry: A sys tematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289(125730),125730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle pro.2020.125730 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Maher, R., Maher, M., Mann, S., and McAl pine, C. A. (2018). Integrating design thinking with sustainability science: a Research through Design approach. Sustainability Science, 13(6), 1565–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018- 0618-6 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Mahmoodi, E., Fathi, M., and Ghobakhloo, M. (2022). The impact of Industry 4.0 on bottleneck analysis in production and manufacturing: Current trends and future perspectives. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 174(108801), 108801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cie.2022.108801 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Mortaheb, M. M., and Mahpour, A. (2016). Integrated construction waste mana gement, a holistic approach. Scientia iranica, 23(5), 2044–2056. https://doi. org/10.24200/sci.2016.2269 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Okudan, O., Budayan, C., and Dikmen, I. (2021). A knowledge-based risk mana gement tool for construction projects using case-based reasoning. Expert Systems with Applications, 173(114776), 114776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eswa.2021.114776 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Rajabi, S., El-Sayegh, S. y Romdhane, L. (2022). Identificación y evaluación de indicadores de desempeño de susten tabilidad para proyectos de construc ción. Indicadores ambientales y de sosteni bilidad, 15(100193), 100193. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100193 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. The Science of the Total Environment, 786(147481), 147481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sci totenv.2021.147481 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Sala, J. M. P., and Picallo-Pérez, A. (2020). Sustainability and exergy in buildings. An Exergy Analysis and Thermoecono mics of Buildings (pp. 791–843). https:// doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817611- 5.00010-2 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Santoli, L. (2019). From efficient to sus tainable and zero energy consumption buildings (pp. 75–205). In Handbook of Energy Efficiency in Buildings. https:// doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812817- 6.00038-3 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Sophie Wang, Q., Lai, S., Pi, S., and An derson, H. (2022). Does directors’ and officers’ liability insurance induce em pire building? Evidence from corporate labor investment. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 73(101753), 101753. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101753 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Sharma, A. K. (2020). Evaluation of sus tainability indicators of buildings. En Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustai nable Materials (pp. 87–91). https:// doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581- 8.10715-5 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Shen, C., and Li, P. (2023). Social unders tanding of green building projects in China (2006–2022): Stakeholders, issue attention and divergences. Environmen tal Impact Assessment Review, 99(107004),107004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eiar.2022.107004 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Shojaei, P., and Haeri, S. A. S. (2019). De velopment of supply chain risk mana gement approaches for construction projects: A grounded theory approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cie.2018.11.045 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Shi, Q., Cai, R., Huo, T., You, K., and Cai, W. (2023). A fairly and effective analy sis for sharing CO2 emissions reduc tion responsibility in China’s provin cial building sectors. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 99(106984), 106984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eiar.2022.106984 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Silva, J. da, Fernandes, V., Limont, M., and Rauen, W. B. (2020). Sustainable development assessment from a ca pital’s perspective: Analytical struc ture and indicator selection criteria. Journal of Environmental Management, 260(110147), 110147. https://doi.or g/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110147 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Walker, NL, Williams, AP y Styles, D. (2020). Indicadores clave de rendi miento para explicar la eficiencia ener gética y económica en los servicios de agua, e identificar representantes ade cuados. Revista de Gestión Ambiental, 269(110810), 110810. https://doi.or g/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110147 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Yi, S. y Lim, SA (2021). Evaluación de la ecoeficiencia de las instalaciones de tra tamiento de residuos en Corea. Revis ta de materiales peligrosos, 411(125040), 125040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhazmat.2021.125040 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ordoñez, M. y Meneses, L. (2015). Cri terios de sostenibilidad en el subsec tor vial. Ciencia e Ingeniería Neogra nadina, 25(2), 81 – 98. https://doi. org/10.18359/rcin.1433 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Sancho, G. García, E. y Rozo, E. (2017). Comparativa de indicadores de soste nibilidad para destinos desarrollados, desarrollo y con poblaciones vulnera bles. Annals of Tourism Reserach, 9(1), 150-177. https://www.uv.es/sancho/ sostenibilidad%20destinospoblacio nes%20vulnerables.pdf | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Puentes-Ramírez, E., Hidalgo-Guerrero, A., Ortiz-Bernal, Y. y Betancourt-Qui roga, C. (2020). Indicadores de soste nibilidad social y su relación con el concepto de capital social. Revista de Arquitectura, 23(1), 97-104. https://doi. org/10.14718/RevArq.2021.3072 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García, S. y Guerrero, M. (2006) Indica dores de sustentabilidad ambiental en la gestión de espacios verdes. Parque urba no Monte Calvario, Tandil, Argenti na. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718- 34022006000100004 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Soria, J. y Valenzuela, L. (2015). dimensio nes relevantes para la evaluación am biental proactiva de la movilidad urba na. Investigaciones Geográficas, 87, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.34416 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Porras-Díaz, H., Sánchasez-Rivera, O., Gal vis-Guerra, J., Jaimez-Plata, N. y Ctañeda-Parra, K. (2015). Tecnologías “Building Information Modeling” en la elaboración de presupuestos de cons trucción de estructuras en concreto reforzado. Entramado, 11(1), 230-249. https://doi.org/10.18041/entrama do.2015v11n1.2111 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.DOI | https://doi.org/10.22490/21456453.6719 | en_US |
