| dc.contributor.author | Quintero Quintero, Wilder | |
| dc.contributor.author | Blanco-Ariza, A.B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Garzón-Castrillón, M.A. | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Colombia | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-21T15:45:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-21T15:45:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1567214X | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5422 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Este trabajo proporciona una visualización general de la producción científica en instituciones de educación superior mediante análisis bibliométrico. En primer lugar, se obtuvo información detallada sobre artículos de investigación sobre este tema de la base de datos Scopus. En segundo lugar, los datos se analizaron con Excel para eliminar duplicados y errores de extracción mediante la comparación directa y el análisis de gráficos relacionados con el crecimiento del campo de la producción científica. Posteriormente, se realizó el análisis bibliométrico con la herramienta R-Studio. Los resultados mostraron 2281 documentos publicados en 1422 fuentes (revistas, libros y otros) elaborados por 7561 autores, con una tasa de crecimiento anual del 9,80%, donde Estados Unidos es el país con mayor número de citas. Finalmente, se proporciona una red colaborativa de países y autores, según los datos analizados de los documentos relacionados con la producción científica en instituciones de educación superior, para observar los estudios más representativos sobre este importante campo de las ciencias sociales y de la educación. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | spa | en_US |
| dc.relation | https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/11450 | en_US |
| dc.title | UN ANÁLISIS BIBLIOMÉTRICO SOBRE LA PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA EN LAS INSTITUCIONES SUPERIORES | en_US |
| dc.title.translated | A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS ABOUT THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN HIGHER INSTITUTIONS | en_US |
| dc.contributor.cvlac | [0001485771] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.googlescholar | [gMeWSpwAAAAJ] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.orcid | [0000-0003-3260-6923] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchgate | [Wilder-Quintero] | en_US |
| dc.contributor.scopus | [57210748286] | en_US |
| dc.description.abstractenglish | This work provides a general visualization of scientific production in higher institutions using bibliometric analysis. Firstly, detailed information on research articles on this topic was obtained from the Scopus database. Secondly, the data were analyzed using Excel to delete duplicates and extraction errors through the direct comparison and analysis of graphs related to the scientific production field's growth. Then, the bibliometric analysis was executed using the R-Studio tool. The results exposed those 2,281 documents published in 1,422 sources (journals, books, and others) elaborated by 7,561 authors with an annual growth rate of 9.80%, where the USA is the most important country for his times cited. Finally, a collaborative network of the countries and authors is provided according to the data analyzed from the documents related to scientific production in higher institutions to observe the most representative studies about this important field of the social and educational sciences. | en_US |
| dc.subject.proposal | ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRICO | en_US |
| dc.subject.keywords | BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS | en_US |
| dc.subject.lemb | BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS | en_US |
| dc.publisher.faculty | Facultad ciencias administrativas y económicas | en_US |
| dc.type.redcol | http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Aguillo, I. (2012). Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis. Scientometrics, 91, 343–351. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0582-8 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(7), 1320-1326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Arechavala, R. (2011). Las universidades y el desarrollo de la investigación científica y tecnológica en México: Una agenda de investigación. Revista de la Educación Superior 40 (158), 41-57 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Bastidas, M., & Benites, R. (2016). Incidencia de la motivación en la producción científica institucional. Revista Retos, 11(1). DOI: 10.17163/ret.n11.2016.05, 65-87 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Buela, G., Guillén, A., Ramiro, T., & Quevedo, R. (2017). Ranking de investigación de las universidades públicas españolas. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologia y Salud., 8(1), 21-35 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Collins, F. B. (1998). Distributed work arrangements: A research framework. The Information Society, 14(2)., 137–152 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2008). Who collaborates successfully? Prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work ACM., 437 -446 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Díaz, L. (2012). Missions-oriented R&D institutions in energy between 2000 and 2010: A comparative. Research Policy. Volume 41, Issue 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.015, 1742-1756 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?. Scientometrics 105, 1809–1831. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Fernández, F., & Baker, D. (2017). Science Production in the United States: AnUnexpected Synergy between Mass Higher Education and the Super Research University. The Century of Science (International Perspectives on Education and Society, Vol. 33), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 85-111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920170000033006 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ferrand, É., Odou, P., Lebel, D., & Bussières, J. (2019). Evaluation of knowledge and perceptions of pharmacists and residents pharmacists about bibliometric indicators applied to the scientific literature in pharmacy. Annales PharmaceutiquesFrançaises. 77(3), 250-263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharma.2018.11.005 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García de Fanelli, A. M. (2014). Rendimiento académico y abandono universitarioModelos, resultados y alcances de la producción académica en la Argentina. . Revista Argentina de Educación Superior, ISSN-e 1852-8171, Nº. 8., 9-38 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-León, R. A., Gómez-Camperos, J. A., & Jaramillo, H. Y. (2021). Scientometric Review of Trends on the Mechanical Properties of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 30, 4724–4734. doi:10.1007/s11665-021-05524-7 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | García-León, R., Martínez-Trinidad, J., & Campos-Silva, I. (2021). Historical Review on the Boriding Process using Bibliometric Analysis. Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 74, 541–557. doi:10.1007/s12666-020-02174-6 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Gómez, R. E., & Gerena, A. (2017). Análisis de 5 universidades colombianas con mayor porcentaje de investigaciones publicadas en revistas de primer cuartil según el SIR Iber 2014. Bibliotecas. Vol 35, N° 3. EISSN: 1659-3286. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/rb.35-3.1, 1-31 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Guerrero, J. M., Castellanos, M., & Gomez, J. (2019). Uso de un modelo ontológico para evaluar la relevancia de producción científica.Transacciones IEEE América Latina. Volumen 17, Número 9., 1424-1431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109 / TLA.2019.8931135 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Jin, B., & Rousseau, R. (2005). Evaluation of Research Performance and Scientometric Indicators in China. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch, Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research(pp. 497-514). New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.453.9529&rep=rep1&type=pdf | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science. Science 322 (5905), 1259-1262. doi:10.1126/science.1158357 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Kempener, R., Diaz, L., & Condor, J. (2010). Governmental Energy Innovation Investments, Policies and Institutions in the Major Emerging Economies: Brazil, Russia, India, Mexico, China, and South Africa. Energy technology innovation policy discussion paper. , 16. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Mabe, M., & Amin, M. (2001). Growth dynamics of scholarly and scientific journals. Scientometrics, 51(1)., 147–162 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Mayta-Tovalino, F., Pacheco-Mendoza, J., Diaz-Soriano, A., Perez-Vargas, F., Munive-Degregori, A., & Luza, S. (2021). Bibliometric Study of the National Scientific Production of All Peruvian Schools of Dentistry in Scopus. International Journal of Dentistry. Volume 2021 |Article ID 5510209, 1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5510209 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Miller, T. R., Baird, T. D., Littlefield, C. M., Kofinas, G., Chapin, F. S., & Redman, C. L. (2008). Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research . Ecology and Society, 13(2)., 42-60 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Minciencias. (2021). Modelo de medición de grupos de investigación, desarrollo tecnológico o de innovación y de reconocimiento de investigadores del sistema nacional de ciencia, tecnología e innovación.Retrieved from https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/upload/convocatoria/anexo_1_-_documento_conceptual_2021.pdf | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | O'Loughlin, D., MacPhail, A., &Msetfi, R. (2015). The rhetoric and reality of research reputation: ‘fur coat and no knickers’. Studies in Higher Education, 40(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842224, 806–820. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ordorika, I., & Rodríguez, R. (2010). El ranking Times en el mercadodel prestigio universitario. Perfiles Educativos, vol. XXXII, núm. 129., 8-29 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Pagani, R., Kovaleski, J. L., & Resende, L. M. (2015). Methodi Ordinatio : a proposed methodology to select and rank relevant scientific. Scientometrics. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Peralta, M. J., Solís,F. M., & Peralta, L. M. (2011). Visibilidad e impacto de la producción científica de la Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas durante el período 2000-2008. Revista Cubana de ACIME Vol.22 No.1. , 60-78 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Piedra, Y., & Martínez, A. (2007). Producción científica . Ciencias de la Información, vol. 38, núm. 3., 33-38 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Powell, J. J., & Dusdal, J. (2017). The European Center of Science Productivity: Research universities and institutes in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. International Perspectives on Education and Society., 33, 55-83 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Pritchard, A. (1969). Statiscal bibliography or Bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation. 25(4), 348-369 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Ramírez, M. S. (2015). Acceso abierto y su repercusión en la Sociedad del Conocimiento: Reflexiones de casos prácticos en Latinoamérica. Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(1)., 103-118. | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Rhoten, D. (2011). Interdisciplinary Research: Trend or Transition. Items and Issues, 5(1–2)., 6 -11 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Rhoten, D., & Parker, A. (2005). EDUCATION: Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path. Science, 306(5704). DOI: 10.1126/science.1103628, 2046–2046 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Salmerón, E., & Manzano, F. (2018). The higher education sustainability through virtual laboratories: The Spanish University as case of study. Sustainability (Switzerland). , Volume 10(11,4), 1-22 | en_US |
| dc.relation.references | Visser, M., van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quant. Sci. Stud., 2, 20–41. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00112 | en_US |
