Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Innovación Abierta: Un análisis bibliométrico

dc.contributor.authorArevalo Ascanio, Jose Gregorio
dc.contributor.authorQuintero Quintero, Wilder
dc.contributor.authorSotelo Barrios, Mauricio Enrique
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-19T13:52:22Z
dc.date.available2025-05-19T13:52:22Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2145-5147en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5391
dc.description.abstractEste artículo aborda un análisis bibliométrico sobre innovación abierta a nivel mundial, utilizando la base de datos Scopus para el periodo de 2010 a 2021. Para lo cual se utilizó el tipo de investigación descriptiva, con enfoque cuantitativo mediante el análisis estadístico, y cualitativo en el análisis documental de las publicaciones más importantes. Se encontró que el estudio de innovación abierta ha tenido mayor importancia a nivel global, destacándose países como: Italia, Estados Unidos, Reino Unido, Alemania y España en el área temática de Negocios y Gestión principalmente. También se analizaron las palabras claves utilizando el software VOSviewer, los principales autores e instituciones más relevantes de esta temática de estudio a nivel global y en Colombia. No obstante, en Colombia existen escasos estudios relacionados con esta temática, por lo que, se requiere que exista un mayor interés científico por esta área. Como producto del análisis realizado, se identificaron las características y las tendencias de investigación actual, se presenta un modelo teórico, teniendo en cuenta las orientaciones del Método Ordinatio, resaltando las particularidades más importantes de las publicaciones realizadasen_US
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.relationhttps://revistas.unisimon.edu.co/index.php/desarrollogerencial/article/view/5814en_US
dc.titleInnovación Abierta: Un análisis bibliométricoen_US
dc.title.translatedOpen Innovation: A bibliometric analysisen_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0000857157]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0001485771]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0001393074]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[JT_6q38AAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[gMeWSpwAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[6th5Xw8AAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0001-5464-2293]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0003-3260-6923]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0002-6091-7473]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[Jose-Gregorio-Arevalo-Ascanio-2154405295]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[Wilder-Quintero]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[Mauricio-Sotelo-Barrios]en_US
dc.contributor.scopus[57195914805]en_US
dc.contributor.scopus[57210748286]en_US
dc.contributor.scopus[57205116062]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishThis article addresses a bibliometric analysis of open innovation across the world, using the Scopus database for the period of 2010–2021. For this purpose, descriptive research was used with a quantitative approach through the statistical and qualitative documental analysis of leading publications. It was found that the study of open innovation has had a greater significance at a global scale, more so in countries such as: Italy, the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Spain, mainly in the Business and Management subject. The keywords were also analyzed using the VOS viewer software along with the main authors and most relevant institutions in this study subject, both worldwide and in Colombia. However, there are very few studies related to this subject in Colombia, therefore a greater scientific interest in this area is required. As a result of the analysis performed, the features and tendencies of current research were identified, and a theoretical model is presented, taking the guidelines of the Methodi Ordinatio into consideration and highlighting the most significant particularities of the publications made.en_US
dc.subject.proposalCompetitividaden_US
dc.subject.proposalInnovación abiertaen_US
dc.subject.proposalOrganizacionesen_US
dc.subject.proposalProducción cientificaen_US
dc.subject.proposalSistemas de innovaciónen_US
dc.subject.keywordsCompetitivenessen_US
dc.subject.keywordsOpen innovationen_US
dc.subject.keywordsOrganizationsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsInnovation systemsen_US
dc.subject.keywordsScientific productionen_US
dc.subject.lembInnovación Abiertaen_US
dc.subject.lembUn análisis bibliométricoen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ciencias administrativas y económicasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesAgredo Díaz, M. L., Ramírez Ordoñez, F. A., & Tabarquino Muñoz, R. A. (2020). Open innovation and public policies in developing countries. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(3), 787–804. DOI: 10.24874/IJQR14.03-09en_US
dc.relation.referencesAlbornoz, M. (2009). Indicadores de innovación: las dificultades de un concepto en evolución. CTS: Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 5(13), 9–25.en_US
dc.relation.referencesArchambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y., & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the web of science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1320–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062en_US
dc.relation.referencesAria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007en_US
dc.relation.referencesArias-Pérez, J., Velez-Ocampo, J., & Cepeda-Cardona, J. (2021). Strategic orientation toward digitalization to improve innovation capability: why knowledge acquisition and exploitation through external embeddedness matter. Journal of Knowledge Management.en_US
dc.relation.referencesArias-Pérez, J., Lozada, N., y Henao-García, E. (2020). When it comes to the impact of absorptive capacity on co-innovation, how really harmful is knowledge leakage? Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1841–1857. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0084en_US
dc.relation.referencesAziz, E., Mustapha, H., & Jamila, E. A. (2020). A bibliometric study of the recent advances in open innovation concept. Procedia Computer Science, 175, 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.100en_US
dc.relation.referencesBaldwin, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0618en_US
dc.relation.referencesBaregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578en_US
dc.relation.referencesBerchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017en_US
dc.relation.referencesBermúdez, A. M., Riveros, C., y Calderon, M. (2017). Innovation Open Chains: A Model of Competitiveness for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Colombia. Advanced Science Letters, 23(11), 10846-10849.en_US
dc.relation.referencesBernal-Torres, C. A., y Frost-González, S. (2015). Innovación abierta en empresas colombianas: reto a superar. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 20(70). https://doi.org/10.31876/revista.v20i70.19996en_US
dc.relation.referencesBernal-Torres, E. (2017a). Modelo de Innovación Abierta : Énfasis en el Potencial Humano. 28(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642017000100007en_US
dc.relation.referencesBernal-Torres, E. (2017b). Modelo de Innovación Abierta : Énfasis en el Potencial Humano Open Innovation Model : Focus on Human Potential. 28(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642017000100007en_US
dc.relation.referencesBeverland, M. B., Wilner, S. J. S., & Micheli, P. (2015). Reconciling the tension between consistency and relevance: design thinking as a mechanism for brand ambidexterity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(5), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0443-8en_US
dc.relation.referencesBianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., & Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002en_US
dc.relation.referencesBogers, M., Chesbrough, H., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. J. (2019). Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective. California Management Review, 62(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619885150en_US
dc.relation.referencesBogers, M., Zobel, A. K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S., Hagedoorn, J., Hilgers, D., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M. G., Majchrzak, A., McCarthy, I. P., Moeslein, K. M., Nambisan, S., Piller, F. T., …& Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068en_US
dc.relation.referencesBrabham, D. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.referencesBrown, S., & Eisenhardt, K. (1995). Product development: past research. Present findings, and future directions. Management, 20(2), 343–378.en_US
dc.relation.referencesCano, J. A., y Londoño-Pineda, A. (2020). Scientific literature analysis on sustainability with the implication of open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040162en_US
dc.relation.referencesCarayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2en_US
dc.relation.referencesCasa Editorial El Tiempo. (2021, 8 de septiembre). Las empresas y “startups” con más innovación abierta del país. Portafolio. www.portafolio.co/innovacion/empresas-y-startups-con-mas-abierta-del-pais-segun-100-open-startups-556022%0Aen_US
dc.relation.referencesCastro, A. F., Sossa, J. W., Solleiro, J. L., Montes, J. M., Martínez, E. E., Piedrahita, J. C, & Concha, J. L. (2018). Proposal of innovation management model for a final consumer sales company. Revista Lasallista de Investigacion, 15(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v15n1a8en_US
dc.relation.referencesCepeda, J., & Arias-Pérez, J. (2019). Information technology capabilities and organizational agility: The mediating effects of open innovation capabilities. Multinational Business Review, 27(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-11-2017-0088en_US
dc.relation.referencesChang López, R. (2020). Desafíos post COVID-19 de las políticas públicas en los modelos de innovación abierta, triple o tetra hélice en el mundo virtual y digital de la región latinoamericana. Revista Centroamericana de Administración Pública. https://doi.org/10.35485/rcap79_7en_US
dc.relation.referencesChen, J., Chen, Y., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.03.002en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H., & Brunswicker, S. (2014). A fad or a phenomenon?: The adoption of open innovation practices in large firms. Research-Technology Management, 57(2), 16–25.en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. (2004). Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26., 47(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2004.11671604en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. W. (2003a). The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080462851-26en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. W. (2003b). Innovación abierta: el nuevo imperativo para crear y aprovechar la tecnología . Harvard Business Press.en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. W. (2011). Bringing open innovation to services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 85. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/bringing-open-innovation-to-services/en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. (2012). Open innovation: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Research Technology Management, 55(4), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5504085en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H. (2020). To recover faster from Covid-19, open up: Managerial implications from an open innovation perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 88(April), 410–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.010en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation Keywords. New Frontiers in Open Innovation, 1–37. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2427233en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R and D Management, 36(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.xen_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H., Lettl, C., & Ritter, T. (2018). Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(6), 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12471en_US
dc.relation.referencesChesbrough, H., & Schwartz, K. (2007). Innovating business models with co-development partnerships. Research Technology Management, 50(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2007.11657419en_US
dc.relation.referencesChiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.007en_US
dc.relation.referencesDahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation ? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013en_US
dc.relation.referencesDella Corte, V., Del Gaudio, G., Sepe, F., & Sciarelli, F. (2019). Sustainable tourism in the open innovation realm: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(21), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216114en_US
dc.relation.referencesDiaz-Delgado, M. F., Gil, H., Oltra-Badenes, R., & Martinez-Ardila, H. E. (2020). Detonating factors of collaborative innovation from the human capital management. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 14(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-10-2019-0102en_US
dc.relation.referencesEnkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon. R and D Management, 39(4), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.xen_US
dc.relation.referencesEnkel, E., Heil, S., Hengstler, M., & Wirth, H. (2017). Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute? Technovation, 60–61(August), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.08.002en_US
dc.relation.referencesEscorsa, P., & Valls, J. (2003). Tecnología e innovación en la empresa. Ediciones UPC.en_US
dc.relation.referencesFontalvo, A., Luckert, A., Martínez, S., Olivella, J., & Cantillo, E. (2013). Papel de la innovación en el sector empresarial. Eleventh LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology, 9.en_US
dc.relation.referencesFranzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005en_US
dc.relation.referencesGao, H., Ding, X. H., & Wu, S. (2020). Exploring the domain of open innovation: Bibliometric and content analyses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122580en_US
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, A., y López, J. (2010). Innovación abierta: desafíos organizacionales de este nuevo modelo de gestión de la innovación para las empresas. Revista Galega de Economía, 19, 131-144. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=39115737008en_US
dc.relation.referencesGonzález-Palacio, L., González-Palacio, M., y Ortiz-Pabón, J. (2017). Las redes sociales web como herramienta para gestionar información en procesos de co-creación TT - Social networks as a tool to manage information in co-creation processes. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, 24, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.17013/risti.24.57en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17081/dege.14.2.5814en_US


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Innovación Abierta Un análisis ...
Tamaño:
777.0Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem