Show simple item record

RELACIÓN ENTRE LA GESTIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y LA INNOVACIÓN EN EL SECTOR PÚBLICO: UNA REVISIÓN DE LITERATURA

dc.contributor.authorMosquera Carrascal, Adriana
dc.contributor.authorJurado-Zambrano, Diego Armando
dc.contributor.authorEspinal Marulanda, John Jairo
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-07T14:15:46Z
dc.date.available2025-05-07T14:15:46Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0124-8693en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorioinstitucional.ufpso.edu.co/xmlui/handle/20.500.14167/5292
dc.description.abstractLa administración pública para ser eficiente requiere cambiar el esquema burocrático por uno gerencial, por tanto, es fundamental la adopción de prácticas organizacionales innovadoras. En este sentido, se realiza una revisión de literatura que tiene como objetivo identificar las relaciones estudiadas entre la gestión del conocimiento y la innovación en el sector público, así como también las tendencias de investigación que involucren las mismas. La investigación se desarrolla bajo un enfoque cualitativo y su alcance es descriptivo; el estudio consideró un grupo de artículos identificados en la base de datos scopus y otros se agregaron a consideración de los autores del documento. Los resultados muestran un bajo número de documentos que se ocupan de estudiar la relación entre ambas temáticas. En los artículos identificados se evidencia la existencia de una estrecha relación de la gestión del conocimiento como un determinante para la innovación pública, específicamente desde el proceso de transferencia de conocimiento. Se concluye que este campo de estudio es prolífero, con abundantes oportunidades para investigar y comprender la gestión del conocimiento y la innovación en el sector público, dadas sus particularidades; asimismo se identificó la necesidad de vincular estos campos de conocimiento con temas de debate actual, tales como los living labs, las tecnologías de la cuarta revolución industrial, la gobernanza y la participación ciudadana.en_US
dc.language.isospaen_US
dc.relationhttp://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0124-86932023000200197&script=sci_arttexten_US
dc.titleRELACIÓN ENTRE LA GESTIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y LA INNOVACIÓN EN EL SECTOR PÚBLICO: UNA REVISIÓN DE LITERATURAen_US
dc.title.translatedRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A LITERATURE REVIEWen_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0001389409]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0001391830]en_US
dc.contributor.cvlac[0000089645]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[uE8tFd4AAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[dsGEDlIAAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.googlescholar[Yt7gDQ4AAAAJ]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0001-5993-1529]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0001-6666-6444]en_US
dc.contributor.orcid[0000-0003-1388-7416]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[Adriana-Mosquera-Carrascal-2244322779]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[Diego-Zambrano-10]en_US
dc.contributor.researchgate[John-Espinal-Marulanda]en_US
dc.contributor.scopus[57221954452]en_US
dc.contributor.scopus[57878850500]en_US
dc.description.abstractenglishIn order to be efficient, public administration requires changing the bureaucratic scheme for a managerial one, therefore, the adoption of innovative organizational practices is essential. In this sense, a literature review is carried out that aims to identify the relationships studied between knowledge management and innovation in the public sector, as well as the research trends that involve them. The research is developed under a qualitative approach and its scope is descriptive; the study considered a group of articles identified in the scopus database and others were added for consideration by the authors of the document. The results show a low number of documents that deal with studying the relationship between both themes. In the identified articles, the existence of a close relationship of knowledge management as a determinant for public innovation is evidenced, specifically from the knowledge transfer process. It is concluded that this field of study is prolific, with abundant opportunities to investigate and understand knowledge management and innovation in the public sector, given its particularities; Likewise, the need to link these fields of knowledge with topics of current debate, such as living labs, the technologies of the fourth industrial revolution, governance and citizen participation, was identified.en_US
dc.subject.proposalAdministración Públicaen_US
dc.subject.proposalConocimientoen_US
dc.subject.proposalGestión Del Conocimientoen_US
dc.subject.proposalGobiernoen_US
dc.subject.proposalGestión Públicaen_US
dc.subject.keywordsPublic Administrationen_US
dc.subject.keywordsKnowledgeen_US
dc.subject.keywordsKnowledge Managementen_US
dc.subject.keywordsGovernmenten_US
dc.subject.keywordsPublic Managementen_US
dc.subject.lembGESTIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y LA INNOVACIÓNen_US
dc.subject.lembREVISIÓN DE LITERATURAen_US
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad ciencias administrativas y económicasen_US
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTen_US
dc.relation.referencesAgrifoglio, R., Metallo, C., & di Nauta, P. (2021). Understanding knowledge management in public organizations through the organizational knowing perspective: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Public Organization Review, 21(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00480-7en_US
dc.relation.referencesAl Ahbabi, S. A., Singh, S. K., Balasubramanian, S., & Gaur, S. S. (2019). Employee perception of impact of knowledge management processes on public sector performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2017-0348en_US
dc.relation.referencesAlavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961en_US
dc.relation.referencesAnshari, M., & Hamdan, M. (2022). Understanding knowledge management and upskilling in Fourth Industrial Revolution: Transformational shift and SECI model. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 52(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2021-0203en_US
dc.relation.referencesBalasubramanian, S., Al-Ahbabi, S., & Sreejith, S. (2020). Knowledge management processes and performance: The impact of ownership of public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2019-0131en_US
dc.relation.referencesBartelt, V. L., Urbaczewski, A., Mueller, A. G., & Sarker, S. (2020). Enabling collaboration and innovation in Denver’s smart city through a living lab: A social capital perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1762127en_US
dc.relation.referencesBjorvatn, T., & Wald, A. (2020). The impact of time pressure on knowledge transfer effectiveness in teams: Trust as a critical but fragile mediator. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(10), 2357–2372. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2020-0379en_US
dc.relation.referencesBloch, C. (2011). Measuring public innovation in the Nordic Countries (MEPIN). The Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy (CFA). http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:707193/FULLTEXT01.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesBoyes, B. (2016, November 3). The nexus between knowledge management and innovation. Real KM Evidence Based Practical Results. http://realkm.com/2016/11/03/the-nexus-between-knowledge-management-and-innovation/en_US
dc.relation.referencesChaudhuri, R., Chavan, G., Vadalkar, S., Vrontis, D., & Pereira, V. (2021). Two-decade bibliometric overview of publications in the Journal of Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(6), 1550–1574.en_US
dc.relation.referencesChawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2010). Knowledge management initiatives in Indian public and private sector organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14(6), 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011084871en_US
dc.relation.referencesCogollo, J. M., & Correa, A. A. (2017). La gestión de la calidad en cadenas de suministro: Desarrollos y tendencias. Espacios, 38(37), 43–56. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n37/a17v38n37p16.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesCriado, J., Ferreira, T., Sano, H., Rojas, F., Silvan, A., & Filho, A. (2021). Public innovation and living labs in action: A comparative analysis in post-New Public Management contexts. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(6), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729181en_US
dc.relation.referencesDe Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209en_US
dc.relation.referencesDe Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2018). The diffusion and adoption of public sector innovations: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(3), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvy001en_US
dc.relation.referencesDemircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy, 46(9), 1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004en_US
dc.relation.referencesDi Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Pezzi, A., & Kalisz, D. E. (2021). The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 123, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042en_US
dc.relation.referencesDias, C., & Escoval, A. (2012). The open nature of innovation in the hospital sector: The role of external collaboration networks. Health Policy and Technology, 1(4), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2012.10.002en_US
dc.relation.referencesDurst, S., Lindvall, B., & Bruns, G. (2020). Knowledge risk management in the public sector: Insights into a Swedish municipality. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(4), 717–735. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2017-0558en_US
dc.relation.referencesFerguson, S., Burford, S., & Kennedy, M. (2013). Divergent approaches to knowledge and innovation in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.749278en_US
dc.relation.referencesGirard, J. P., & McIntyre, S. (2010). Knowledge management modeling in public sector organizations: A case study. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011012330en_US
dc.relation.referencesGold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669en_US
dc.relation.referencesGürlek, M., & Koseoglu, M. A. (2023). Mapping knowledge management research in hospitality: A bibliometric analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 43(9–10), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2169279en_US
dc.relation.referencesHartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136en_US
dc.relation.referencesJurado, D., & Valencia, S. (2021). Gestión del conocimiento: Caso de una entidad del sector público colombiano. Tendencias, 22(2), 130–156. https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.212202.171en_US
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Reviews in Software Engineering. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Joint Technical Report. Keele University.en_US
dc.relation.referencesKrogh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165947en_US
dc.relation.referencesLapuente, V., & Suzuki, K. (2020). Politicization, bureaucratic legalism, and innovative attitudes in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13175en_US
dc.relation.referencesLartey, P. Y., Kong, Y., Afriyie, S. O., Santosh, R. J., & Bah, F. (2021). Knowledge management issues in India: A public sector perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1676778en_US
dc.relation.referencesLee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756en_US
dc.relation.referencesMafabi, S., Munene, J., & Ntayi, J. (2012). Knowledge management and organisational resilience: Organisational innovation as a mediator in Uganda parastatals. Journal of Strategy and Management, 5(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251211200455en_US
dc.relation.referencesManesh, M. F., Pellegrini, M. M., Marzi, G., & Dabic, M. (2021). Knowledge management in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Mapping the literature and scoping future avenues. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2963489en_US
dc.relation.referencesMassaro, M., Dumay, J., & Garlatti, A. (2015). Public sector knowledge management: A structured literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(3), 530–558. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2014-0466en_US
dc.relation.referencesMcEvoy, P., Ragab, M., & Arisha, A. (2017). Review on the KM applications in public organisations. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.21427/7akk-3h91en_US
dc.relation.referencesMcNabb, D. E. (2007). Knowledge management in the public sector: A blueprint for innovation in government. M.E. Sharpe. http://pustaka.unp.ac.id/file/abstrak_kki/EBOOKS/KNOWLEDGE%20MANAGEMENT%20Knowledge%20management%20in%20the%20public%20sector%20%20a%20blueprint%20for%20innovation%20in%20government.pdfen_US
dc.relation.referencesMeijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2021). The dark side of public innovation. Public Performance and Management Review, 44(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1782954en_US
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro, T., de Souza, P., & Bous, W. (2015, September 1–3). Open innovation for citizen coproduction [Conference presentation]. 4th International Conference, EGOVIS 2015, Valencia, España. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-22389-6en_US
dc.relation.referencesNonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2635068en_US
dc.relation.referencesOnonye, U., & Igwe, A. (2019). Knowledge sharing process and innovation success: Evidence from public organisations in Southern Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 14, 183–198. https://doi.org/10.28945/4358en_US
dc.relation.referencesOrganización de las Naciones Unidas. (s.f.). Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible.en_US
dc.relation.referencesPage, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71en_US
dc.relation.referencesPandey, S. C., & Dutta, A. (2015). Knowledge infrastructure capabilities and knowledge management: Case of an Indian public sector undertaking. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 6(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2015.069457en_US
dc.relation.referencesPopadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011en_US
dc.relation.referencesPopadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011en_US
dc.relation.referencesRasmussen, P., & Nielsen, P. (2011). Knowledge management in the firm: Concepts and issues. International Journal of Manpower, 32(5/6), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721111158161en_US
dc.relation.referencesRogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019). Diffusion of innovations. In An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 418–434). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203710753-35en_US
dc.relation.referencesSeba, I., Rowley, J., & Delbridge, R. (2012). Knowledge sharing in the Dubai Police Force. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211198972en_US
dc.relation.referencesSerenko, A., & Dumay, J. (2015). Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part I: Articles and their characteristics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 401–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2014-0220en_US
dc.relation.referencesSerenko, A. (2013). Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: Discovering the identity of the discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(5), 773–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2013-0166en_US
dc.identifier.DOIhttps://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.232402.233en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
RELACIÓN ENTRE LA GESTIÓN DEL ...
Size:
485.3Kb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record